--- title: The Division that the Brett Kavanaugh Vote Won't Change description: As the Senate debates a vote on Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, America is ignoring a problem that is even more difficult canonical: https://time.com/5408893/supreme-court-brett-kavanaugh-conservative-progressive-divide/ author: Roger Pilon article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2018-09-28T19:15:03.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-23T21:34:23.299Z article:section: Ideas og:title: The Vote on Brett Kavanaugh Won't Solve America’s Deeper Supreme Court Problem og:description: A resolution here will not help the greater battle og:url: https://time.com/5408893/supreme-court-brett-kavanaugh-conservative-progressive-divide/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltf5068a5e46bc9d59/69893b5186f68e77416ea477/brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 3000 og:image:height: 1688 og:image:alt: Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh confirmation hearing, Washington DC, USA - 06 Sep 2018 og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: The Vote on Brett Kavanaugh Won't Solve America’s Deeper Supreme Court Problem twitter:description: A resolution here will not help the greater battle twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltf5068a5e46bc9d59/69893b5186f68e77416ea477/brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # The Vote on Brett Kavanaugh Won't Solve America’s Deeper Supreme Court Problems > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=4087f4d9-f168-41d5-be62-e19bf5368d43&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=4087f4d9-f168-41d5-be62-e19bf5368d43&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=4087f4d9-f168-41d5-be62-e19bf5368d43&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=4087f4d9-f168-41d5-be62-e19bf5368d43&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1) by [Roger Pilon](https://time.com/author/roger-pilon/) ## Roger Pilon Sep 28, 2018 7:15 PM UTC  Judge Brett Kavanaugh testifies before the United States Senate Judiciary Committee on his nomination as Associate Justice of the US Supreme Court on Sept. 6, 2018. Judge Brett Kavanaugh testifies before the United States Senate Judiciary Committee on his nomination as Associate Justice of the US Supreme Court on Sept. 6, 2018. REX/Shutterstock by [Roger Pilon](https://time.com/author/roger-pilon/) ## Roger Pilon Sep 28, 2018 7:15 PM UTC The circus surrounding the [Supreme Court](http://time.com/5407757/ruth-bader-ginsburg-metoo-kavanaugh/) nomination of [Judge Brett Kavanaugh](http://time.com/5407920/supreme-court-problems/) has shown beyond any doubt how deeply divided America is. And when the dust settles, we’ll still be divided. So too will be the Court. To see why, and how we got here, we need to start at the beginning. In a nutshell, our founding documents were designed mainly to secure liberty under limited government, especially after the [Civil War amendments](http://time.com/5372770/womens-equality-day-2018-facts/) were added to the Constitution, checking what states could do. We didn’t always abide by those ideals, but generally we lived life in the private sector, our relationships ordered by common-law principles of property and contract. Early 20th century progressives rejected that vision fundamentally. They wanted to promote social and economic change through statutory law. But the courts rejected much of that legislation on constitutional grounds, most sharply during President Franklin Roosevelt’s first term. After his landslide reelection in 1936, he tried to pack the Supreme Court with six new members. [Congress](http://time.com/5404209/congress-hurricane-florence-relief/) rejected the scheme, but the Court got the message. Over the next few years, the Court opened the floodgates for the modern redistributive and regulatory state, reduced economic liberty to a second-class status, and, in 1943, allowed Congress to delegate ever more of its legislative power to the executive-branch agencies Congress had been creating. Today, this is where much of our law is written—not by Congress, but by unelected bureaucrats. The [Constitution](http://time.com/5396569/constitution-day-signers/) was thus turned on its head and politicized. As statutory policies replaced common-law principles, things have grown only more complicated. In short, while the Court was “active” in authorizing these changes, it was essentially deferential to Congress, the president and the states, which allowed government to grow, unchecked by constitutional constraints. That posture would change in the 1950s, however, when the Court finally turned to civil rights. But not all of that liberal activism was grounded in the Constitution, as with the Court’s 1973 abortion decision, and that led to a conservative backlash. Thus, we now had two jurisprudential schools: liberals urging “judicial activism,” to promote “evolving liberal values,” conservatives urging “judicial restraint,” making peace essentially with the New Deal Court’s deference to the political branches. With the election of [Ronald Reagan](http://time.com/5329179/reagan-trump-immigration-ad/), the conservative school came to the fore—and the brutal fight over his nomination of [Robert Bork](http://time.com/4730055/neil-gorsuch-confirmation-robert-bork-history/) to the Court in 1987 saw all of these forces collide, beginning a three-decades-long battle for control of the Court. But neither camp is grounded in the Constitution as understood during our first 150 years. Both have bought into the New Deal court’s rejection of limited government—liberals because they like it, conservatives because they think it a lost cause. Yet those vast government programs still deeply divide us. We’re divided also when it comes to our rights. [Liberals](http://time.com/5272988/citizens-united-campaign-finance-constitution/) tend to invent rights from whole cloth, like to all manner of government services—while disparaging economic liberty. Meanwhile, conservatives would allow legislative majorities to run roughshod over many personal rights, like the right to marry whomever you want or to smoke whatever you wish. **Is there any hope** for reconciliation? There’s a third, [libertarian](http://time.com/money/4474618/libertarian-party-your-money/) school that began slowly emerging in the 1980s, urging a restoration of our founding principles. It’s had a noticeable effect on the two dominant camps, while standing apart from them. When the Court checked Congress’s regulatory power in 1995, for example, liberals screamed. When it upheld certain gay rights in 2003, conservatives screamed. Libertarians stood behind both decisions as consistent with the Constitution. But for the moment, the battles continue. The [growth of government](http://time.com/4696504/president-trump-goes-to-war-with-his-own-government/) has politicized so much in life, including those matters that once were sorted out privately, under the easily understood principles like property and promise that allowed for liberty to flourish. When politics determines the ordinary issues of life—jobs, retirement, health care, day care, education, housing and more—and the political battles over those end up in the courts, it’s no wonder that we’re in a battle for the [Supreme Court](http://time.com/5401620/supreme-court-disgrace/), and that those who fear losing the battle resort to desperate means. The founders understood this, which is why they left most of life beyond government’s reach. It’s time to start rethinking whether we want to be “all in this together,” dependent on a government that is increasingly dysfunctional and going broke. However the issues immediately before us are resolved, we need to focus on the bigger constitutional questions underlying them. — _This article appears in the Oct. 8, 2018 issue of TIME._ ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5408893/supreme-court-brett-kavanaugh-conservative-progressive-divide/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5408893/supreme-court-brett-kavanaugh-conservative-progressive-divide/"},"headline":"The Vote on Brett Kavanaugh Won't Solve America’s Deeper Supreme Court Problems","datePublished":"2018-09-28T19:15:03.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-23T21:34:23.299Z","description":"Even a resolution here will not help the greater battle","url":"https://time.com/5408893/supreme-court-brett-kavanaugh-conservative-progressive-divide/","keywords":["politics","onetime"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltf5068a5e46bc9d59/69893b5186f68e77416ea477/brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Roger Pilon","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/roger-pilon/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltf5068a5e46bc9d59/69893b5186f68e77416ea477/brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh confirmation hearing, Washington DC, USA - 06 Sep 2018","caption":"Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh confirmation hearing, Washington DC, USA - 06 Sep 2018","creditText":"REX/Shutterstock","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/politics/","name":"politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5408893/supreme-court-brett-kavanaugh-conservative-progressive-divide/","name":"The Vote on Brett Kavanaugh Won't Solve America’s Deeper Supreme Court Problems"}}]}] ```