--- title: Why Donald Trump's Lies Can't Kill the Truth description: Errol Morris, director and author of the new book "The Ashtray," explains what President Trump and "fake news" don't do canonical: https://time.com/5287062/errol-morris-ashtray-donald-trump-lies-fake-news/ author: Errol Morris article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2018-05-22T15:58:19.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-23T20:21:13.708Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Why Donald Trump Can't Kill the Truth og:description: Academy Award–winning documentarian Errol Morris explains og:url: https://time.com/5287062/errol-morris-ashtray-donald-trump-lies-fake-news/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt60315fd203b70b58/69893121cf40a801c3c4c4b1/donald-trump-lies-truth-fake-news-rally.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2405 og:image:height: 1353 og:image:alt: Donald Trump lies og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Why Donald Trump Can't Kill the Truth twitter:description: Academy Award–winning documentarian Errol Morris explains twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt60315fd203b70b58/69893121cf40a801c3c4c4b1/donald-trump-lies-truth-fake-news-rally.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Why Donald Trump Can't Kill the Truth > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=5d7fde48-2b2c-4b84-a798-86db33bb02eb&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=5d7fde48-2b2c-4b84-a798-86db33bb02eb&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=5d7fde48-2b2c-4b84-a798-86db33bb02eb&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. by [Errol Morris](https://time.com/author/errol-morris/) ## Errol Morris May 22, 2018 3:58 PM UTC  President Donald Trump speaks during a rally at Total Sports Park in Washington, Michigan, on April 28, 2018. President Donald Trump speaks during a rally at Total Sports Park in Washington, Michigan, on April 28, 2018. Mandel Ngan—AFP/Getty Images by [Errol Morris](https://time.com/author/errol-morris/) ## Errol Morris May 22, 2018 3:58 PM UTC How many times have I been asked: Is truth dead? Or at least, if truth as a concept has been hopelessly compromised? Many, many times. (Including by [this very publication](http://time.com/4710615/when-a-president-cant-be-taken-at-his-word/).) But truth is still with us and hasn’t been compromised — no matter how many people might insist that it doesn’t exist or is subject to endlessly diverse interpretations. There is one truth. Untruth, on the other hand… The Washington _Post_ recorded [3,001 false or misleading claims made by President Donald Trump](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2018/05/01/president-trump-has-made-3001-false-or-misleading-claims-so-far/?utm%5Fterm=.cd30c604e3dc) in his first 466 days in office. Is this just political in nature? Is it fake news? A gross misrepresentation? Consider Trump’s April 28 campaign rally in Washington, Michigan. [As the _Post_ summarized](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2018/05/01/president-trump-has-made-3001-false-or-misleading-claims-so-far/?utm%5Fterm=.f3bfacdb2592), throughout the course of his 80-minute speech, the President made a variety of false claims that ranged from stating that Henry Ford invented the assembly line; to asserting that Franklin Delano Roosevelt served as president for 16 years; to boasting that a 2016 rally saw an audience about four times as large as it actually did; to saying he has “essentially” gotten rid of [Obamacare](http://time.com/5173162/donald-trump-cpac-john-mccain-obamacare-repeal/); to complaining that the U.S. loses “about $500 billion” because of its [trade deficit with China](http://time.com/5266245/us-china-trade-deficit-jinping-trump/), even though the appropriate figure is about $300 billion and a trade deficit is not a win-lose statistic. It was a dizzying array of mistakes, lies and misrepresentations. We might distinguish these categories differently or think some worse than others. But properly speaking, this should not be considered a partisan issue. The truth is not a liberal plot. Truth stands apart from any political party and any kind of partisanship. The fact that anyone would think differently is in and of itself a cause for alarm. How much do we want to give up on? The shape of the Earth? The heliocentric universe? The pythagorean theorem? The structure of DNA? Questions about alternative facts and relative truths have been nettling me for decades. When I was a graduate student at Princeton University in 1972, it had been ten years since the publication of Thomas Kuhn’s [_Structure of Scientific Revolutions_](https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0226458121/ref=as%5Fli%5Fqf%5Fasin%5Fil%5Ftl?ie=UTF8&tag=time037-20&creative=9325&linkCode=as2&creativeASIN=0226458121&linkId=32e3a8d8cf677396e00f236926e9c44c). The book had made him famous. Not because people had read it carefully — I just don’t believe that — but because he came up with a number of notions that had a kind of general appeal. Principal among them was the “paradigm shift.” You might ask, _What in hell is that?_ Although I’m sure you’ve heard the term. Kuhn was arguing that science progresses in fits and starts. In normal science, a group of “practitioners” has settled on a way of defining and solving problems — a paradigm, a conceptual scheme. They have a way of looking at the world and are by and large happy with it. But then there are anomalies — things that don’t fit neatly into the conceptual scheme. One or two anomalies can perhaps be ignored, but as they accumulate they shatter the tranquility of the paradigm. Unexplained anomalies lead to a crisis; a crisis leads to a revolution; a revolution leads to a shift to a new paradigm. This seems okay on the face of it. But Kuhn’s claim was deeper and far more radical. He argued that as science changes, so does the world and so does our ability to comprehend the past. Taken at face value, if Kuhn’s theories were correct, we could never adequately understand the past at all, since it is cloaked from our view by changes in meaning, paradigm shifts and the like. And even though his views were seemingly embraced, it’s not clear to me that anyone ever considered carefully the implications of those views. I would argue the implications are horrific, as bad as it gets. That in essence, they amount to a denial of truth and even a denial of reality. You might think of Kuhn as espousing a kind of crazy idealist philosophy, and that’s what it is. We make the world up as we go along. It reminds me of the famous quote [attributed to Karl Rove](http://www.markdanner.com/articles/words-in-a-time-of-war-on-rhetoric-truth-and-power) — though he’s denied saying it — at a time when George W. Bush was President of the United States: “We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality.” I have very limited sympathy with these views. We can argue about the number of people who went to Trump’s inauguration, but would anyone seriously deny that there is a number and there is a reality to those events? What is so scary about the present time is that people believe that they can assert truth just by screaming louder than others or repeating themselves endlessly, like the Bellman in Lewis Carroll’s “[The Hunting of the Snark](https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/384969433X/ref=as%5Fli%5Fqf%5Fasin%5Fil%5Ftl?ie=UTF8&tag=time037-20&creative=9325&linkCode=as2&creativeASIN=384969433X&linkId=44d91bca7f373d48084b9a63dc003f0d)[”](https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/43909/the-hunting-of-the-snark): “What I tell you three times is true.” But we all know in our heart of hearts that mere repetition and decibel level is no way to truth. Part of the controversy hinges on the difference between “discovery” and “invention.” Do we invent the world or discover it? And the related question: Can we speak of a world outside of ourselves, or are we just conjuring phantasms in the prison of our minds? To me, science and mathematics are ultimately about undiscovered continents: things that really do exist, but we might not yet know about them. The example that I often use is trilobites in the Cambrian period, 600 million years ago. Did trilobites know the value of pi? I think not. Did any living creature in the Cambrian know the value of pi? No. But did pi exist with the same value that we know of today? Yes. Truth is all around us. We just simply have to look for it. This task — figuring out where we stand with respect to truth, to the world around us — is mankind’s most noble activity and something that we should only give up on at our peril. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5287062/errol-morris-ashtray-donald-trump-lies-fake-news/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5287062/errol-morris-ashtray-donald-trump-lies-fake-news/"},"headline":"Why Donald Trump Can't Kill the Truth","datePublished":"2018-05-22T15:58:19.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-23T20:21:13.708Z","description":"Academy Award–winning documentarian Errol Morris explains","url":"https://time.com/5287062/errol-morris-ashtray-donald-trump-lies-fake-news/","keywords":[],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt60315fd203b70b58/69893121cf40a801c3c4c4b1/donald-trump-lies-truth-fake-news-rally.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Errol Morris","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/errol-morris/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt60315fd203b70b58/69893121cf40a801c3c4c4b1/donald-trump-lies-truth-fake-news-rally.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Donald Trump lies","caption":"Donald Trump lies","creditText":"Mandel Ngan—AFP/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5287062/errol-morris-ashtray-donald-trump-lies-fake-news/","name":"Why Donald Trump Can't Kill the Truth"}}]}] ```