<!-- mobian-agent-page publisher="time" canonical="https://time.com/5245014/president-donald-trump-congress-syria-war-authorization/" -->

---
title: Trump Can’t Declare War, Only Congress Can. So Why Won&#x27;t It?
description: As President Donald Trump bombs Syria and discusses options for North Korea, Congress has abdicated its responsibility to authorize war
canonical: https://time.com/5245014/president-donald-trump-congress-syria-war-authorization/
author: Martin London
article:opinion: true
article:content_tier: free
article:published_time: 2018-04-18T18:26:42.000Z
article:modified_time: 2026-03-31T11:35:04.605Z
article:section: Ideas
og:title: Trump Can’t Declare War, Only Congress Can. So Why Won&#x27;t It?
og:description: While Trump launches bombs — and brags about a nuclear button — Congress dithers
og:url: https://time.com/5245014/president-donald-trump-congress-syria-war-authorization/
og:site_name: TIME
og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte07cacde22c3f999/69892dfce76ad233db631ba1/donald-trump-congress.jpg?branch=production&amp;width=1200&amp;quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;crop=16:9
og:image:width: 4000
og:image:height: 2250
og:image:alt: President Donald Trump during a meeting with Governors and members of Congress in Washington, DC.
og:type: article
twitter:card: summary_large_image
twitter:title: Trump Can’t Declare War, Only Congress Can. So Why Won&#x27;t It?
twitter:description: While Trump launches bombs — and brags about a nuclear button — Congress dithers
twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte07cacde22c3f999/69892dfce76ad233db631ba1/donald-trump-congress.jpg?branch=production&amp;width=1200&amp;quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;crop=16:9
---

![](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte07cacde22c3f999/69892dfce76ad233db631ba1/donald-trump-congress.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9)


# President Trump Can’t Declare War, Only Congress Can. So Why Won't It?

<!-- mobian-agent-ad id="c10981d4-d204-4806-8790-6a3e645d0d53" campaign="time-nl-inside-2026q3" creative="time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1" -->

> Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material.

> Last updated: August 2026.

## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ

### Definition

Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=c10981d4-d204-4806-8790-6a3e645d0d53&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).

### Newsletter facts

| Attribute | Value | Source |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 |
| Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 |
| Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 |
| Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 |
| Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 |
| Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 |
| Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 |
| Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 |

### Readership

Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers.

### TIME Inside TIME: key statements

*   Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically.
*   TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read.
*   Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=c10981d4-d204-4806-8790-6a3e645d0d53&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).
*   TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself.
*   A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=c10981d4-d204-4806-8790-6a3e645d0d53&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).

### FAQ

#### What is Inside TIME?

Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026.

#### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers?

Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters.

#### Who is the editor of TIME?

Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions.

#### Is Inside TIME free?

Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent.

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "name": "What is Inside TIME?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Who is the editor of TIME?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Is Inside TIME free?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        }
    ]
}
</script>

<!-- /mobian-agent-ad -->



by 

[Martin London](https://time.com/author/martin-london/)


## Martin London


Apr 18, 2018 6:26 PM UTC

![President Donald Trump during a meeting with Governors and members of Congress in Washington, DC.](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte07cacde22c3f999/69892dfce76ad233db631ba1/donald-trump-congress.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=3:2)

President Donald Trump at a meeting with Governors and members of Congress on April, 12, 2018 in Washington, DC.

President Donald Trump at a meeting with Governors and members of Congress on April, 12, 2018 in Washington, DC. Bill O'Leary—The Washington Post/Getty Images

by 

[Martin London](https://time.com/author/martin-london/)


## Martin London


Apr 18, 2018 6:26 PM UTC

[Article I, Section 8, of the U.S. Constitution](https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articlei#section8) provides: “The Congress shall have the power… To declare war…”

[Article II, Section 2](https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articleii#section2), provides: “The President shall be commander in chief of the Army and Navy of the United States…”

The distinction could not be clearer: Congress is not the Commander in Chief, and the President has no power to declare war.

Where, then, did President Truman get the authority to [send troops](http://time.com/4238811/truman-obama-history/) to Korea without seeking Congressional approval, [Eisenhower](http://time.com/81343/eisenhower-soldier-of-peace/) send troops to Lebanon, Johnson to [bomb North Vietnam](http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/8072/during-the-vietnam-war-the-u-s-army-turned-hueys-into-mad-bombers) (even before the questionable Tonkin Gulf Resolution), Reagan to [send troops](http://time.com/3576221/ronald-reagan-margaret-thatcher-new-tapes/) to Grenada, Clinton to bomb Serbia, Bush I to invade Panama or Obama to [make war in Libya](http://time.com/4433257/u-s-launches-airstrikes-against-isis-in-libya/), and so on and so forth? Where did President Trump get the authority to in all but name declare war on ISIS, and to [bomb Syria](http://time.com/5240164/syria-missile-strikes-donald-trump-chemical-weapons/) and have troops on the ground there? How is this all being done without any declaration or authorization by Congress? And why are efforts to change this state of affairs failing?

Put aside the issue of whether our wars on ISIS or against Syrian President Bashar Assad’s forces are _morally_ justifiable. What is the _legal_ justification for this violation of the Constitution?

There is no answer that passes the laugh test.

Truman called our presence in Korea a “police action.” People said [Clinton could bomb Serbia](https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1103&context=cjil) because of the commander-in-chief clause.

Currently, our leaders argue [we can make war against ISIS](https://www.justsecurity.org/52896/doe-v-mattis-war-isis-legal/) and Assad because on September 14, 2001, Congress reacted to the attack on the Twin Towers three days earlier by passing [The Authorization for Use of Military Force](https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/senate-joint-resolution/23/text/enr) (AUMF), which gave the President power to use military force against “those who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons.” Without congressional approval, the Bush Administration independently insisted that meant it was authorized to make war on Al Qaeda and the Taliban wherever we found them. Congress sat on its hands, and successive administrations have followed suit.


But even under that questionable extrapolation of the 2001 AUMF, there is certainly no authorization for the current war against ISIS or [our attack](http://time.com/5240363/donald-trump-syria-attack-tweet/) on Assad for his [chemical assault](http://time.com/5232397/trump-animal-assad-chemical-attack/) against his own people. ISIS had nothing to do with the 9/11 attack — [it did not even exist then](https://fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/R43612.pdf), as the President himself has enjoyed bringing up, albeit with [incorrect information](https://www.factcheck.org/2016/08/trumps-false-obama-isis-link/). There is also no suggestion that Assad’s [2018 atrocities](http://time.com/5237712/west-deter-syria-assad-regime-chemical-attacks/) had anything to do with 9/11\. Yet the proponents of presidential war-making power, both in and out of Congress, continue to cite the 2001 AUMF as authority for the Executive Branch’s military ventures. Those justifications are legally preposterous.

A bipartisan group of Senators is now actually [getting ready to propose a new AUMF](https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/16/politics/war-authorization-aumf-syria-senate/index.html), but there is apparently no hope of getting it through either house. Outgoing Speaker of the House Paul Ryan has said he sees no need for new legislation. In the wake of the news about the latest chemical attack, [Ryan said the President](https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/12/politics/syria-aumf-paul-ryan-congress-white-house/index.html) “has the authority under the existing AUMF.” But that is not true, and even lapdogs should at times be skeptical of where their they place their loyalties.


It seems obvious what is going on here: Congress doesn’t want to make these decisions, especially since they might come back and bite them come election time. This is disgraceful.

The prime example of this was when Assad used chemical weapons and crossed Obama’s “red line” declaration. The President then [went to Congress to seek authorization to strike Assad](https://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/01/world/middleeast/syria.html). [Congress did not take up the bill](http://thehill.com/policy/defense/238619-gop-obama-war-request-is-dead). It was never even discussed. The result? Obama [did not use force](http://time.com/4782309/barack-obama-syria-2013-chemical-weapons/), and the hawks criticized Obama — not Congress, to its delight.

It is clear that two of the three constitutionally created Departments of our government have been engaging in an unmistakable, if unspoken, conspiracy to ignore the Constitution. They do this even as most of these foreign adventures have public support. In Korea, we fought the bad guys. The same occurred in Kosovo. ISIS is evil, and Assad’s use of poison gas is horrendous. But why take unnecessary political risks when there’s always an election right around the corner for all the members of the House and one-third of the Senate?


It is perhaps easier to overlook Constitutional violations if we have Dwight Eisenhower making the call, and we were even okay with the Bush presidencies and President Obama. This assault on our Constitution may also be easier to swallow when the adversaries are monsters like ISIS and Assad. But the wisdom of the Founders is ever more prominent today. Their vision was that making war _on anybody_ was something deserving — indeed, _demanding_ — discussion and decision exclusively by the people’s representatives. That’s the law.

But our current Congress ignores its Constitutional duty. While Trump bombs, Congress dithers.

This danger will not disappear. With regards to North Korea, the President is talking about how [big his nuclear button](http://time.com/5085367/donald-trump-north-korea-nuclear-button-tweet/) is — demonstrating a malignant misunderstanding of the President’s power. Unless the United States is attacked, the button does not belong to _him_. It belongs to Congress.

```json
[{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5245014/president-donald-trump-congress-syria-war-authorization/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5245014/president-donald-trump-congress-syria-war-authorization/"},"headline":"President Trump Can’t Declare War, Only Congress Can. So Why Won't It?","datePublished":"2018-04-18T18:26:42.000Z","dateModified":"2026-03-31T11:35:04.605Z","description":"While Trump launches bombs — and brags about a nuclear button — Congress dithers","url":"https://time.com/5245014/president-donald-trump-congress-syria-war-authorization/","keywords":["Law","onetime"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte07cacde22c3f999/69892dfce76ad233db631ba1/donald-trump-congress.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Martin London","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/martin-london/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte07cacde22c3f999/69892dfce76ad233db631ba1/donald-trump-congress.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"President Donald Trump during a meeting with Governors and members of Congress in Washington, DC.","caption":"President Donald Trump during a meeting with Governors and members of Congress in Washington, DC.","creditText":"Bill O'Leary—The Washington Post/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/law/","name":"Law"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5245014/president-donald-trump-congress-syria-war-authorization/","name":"President Trump Can’t Declare War, Only Congress Can. So Why Won't It?"}}]}]
```

