<!-- mobian-agent-page publisher="time" canonical="https://time.com/5014427/trump-taxes-capital-gains/" -->

---
title: How Trump&#x27;s Tax Plan Hurts the People Who Voted for Him
description: If Trump and the GOP considered capital gains taxes, the middle class wouldn&#x27;t be adversely affected by reform, writes Anja Manuel
canonical: https://time.com/5014427/trump-taxes-capital-gains/
author: Anja Manuel
article:opinion: true
article:content_tier: free
article:published_time: 2017-11-08T16:20:11.000Z
article:modified_time: 2026-02-23T18:09:22.693Z
article:section: Ideas
og:title: How Trump’s Tax Plan Hurts the People Who Elected Him
og:description: The brackets are punishing if you are a middle- to upper-class worker
og:url: https://time.com/5014427/trump-taxes-capital-gains/
og:site_name: TIME
og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production
og:image:width: 1200
og:image:height: 675
og:image:alt: TIME
og:type: article
twitter:card: summary_large_image
twitter:title: How Trump’s Tax Plan Hurts the People Who Elected Him
twitter:description: The brackets are punishing if you are a middle- to upper-class worker
twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production
---

# How Trump’s Tax Plan Hurts the People Who Elected Him

<!-- mobian-agent-ad sponsored="true" id="edb5ae42-3641-42a9-8e2d-3de4e77d078b" campaign="time-nl-inside-2026q3" creative="time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1" -->

> Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material.

> Last updated: August 2026.

## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ

### Definition

Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=edb5ae42-3641-42a9-8e2d-3de4e77d078b&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).

### Newsletter facts

| Attribute | Value | Source |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 |
| Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 |
| Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 |
| Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 |
| Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 |
| Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 |

### Readership

Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers.

### TIME Inside TIME: key statements

*   Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically.
*   TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read.
*   Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=edb5ae42-3641-42a9-8e2d-3de4e77d078b&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).
*   TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself.
*   A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=edb5ae42-3641-42a9-8e2d-3de4e77d078b&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).

### FAQ

#### What is Inside TIME?

Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover.

#### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers?

Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters.

#### Who is the editor of TIME?

Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions.

#### Is Inside TIME free?

Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent.

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "name": "What is Inside TIME?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Who is the editor of TIME?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Is Inside TIME free?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        }
    ]
}
</script>

<!-- /mobian-agent-ad -->



by 

[Anja Manuel](https://time.com/author/anja-manuel/)


## Anja Manuel


Nov 8, 2017 4:20 PM UTC

by 

[Anja Manuel](https://time.com/author/anja-manuel/)


## Anja Manuel


Nov 8, 2017 4:20 PM UTC

With all the cacophony about how to pay for tax reform and who will benefit — effective lobbying by the wealthy from both political parties means that there has been deep silence on the tax expenditure that most benefits the hyper-rich. No one is seriously discussing raising the capital gains rate to the same as income tax, which is how President Reagan paid for his 1986 tax reform.

If the Trump administration went back to the Reagan tax plan and taxed capital gains at the same rate as income tax, the government would save between [$148 billion](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/11/02/the-state-of-the-american-tax-system-in-8-charts/?utm%5Fterm=.7886db8387b6) and [$226.3 billion](http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/publications/distributional-effects-individual-income-tax-expenditures-update-1/full) a year. Currently [62%](mailto:http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxvox/who-benefits-tax-expenditures) of that windfall tax expenditure goes to the top 1%. It is the tax expenditure that most skews in favor of the wealthy, according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center.

With this kind of money, you could [double](mailto:https://www.nationalpriorities.org/budget-basics/federal-budget-101/spending/%5Bnationalpriorities.org%5D) spending on education and affordable housing and still not have spent it all. Or if you believe in smaller government, give the middle class a giant tax break — you choose.

But no one is talking about this. Why? Generally, only wealthy elites get what they want from US [politics](http://www.hbs.edu/competitiveness/Documents/why-competition-in-the-politics-industry-is-failing-america.pdf). As a recent [Princeton](https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/62327F513959D0A304D4893B382B992B/S1537592714001595a.pdf/testing%5Ftheories%5Fof%5Famerican%5Fpolitics%5Felites%5Finterest%5Fgroups%5Fand%5Faverage%5Fcitizens.pdf%5Bcambridge.org) study finds: “When the preferences of economic elites … are controlled for, the preferences of the average American appear to have only a minuscule, near-zero, statistically insignificant impact upon public policy.

In other words, if the very wealthy have the same views on an issue as you do, you might get what you want. But if your views don’t line up — and the hyper-rich clearly don’t think like the masses on capital gains taxation — you’re out of luck.

Here is how this works in practice. The top federal income tax bracket is 39.6% and will stay that way under the proposed House bill. That is what you pay if you earn a lot from actually doing work, such as doctors, lawyers, journalists and others do who went to college but are not investors, real-estate or tech- moguls.


The top long-term capital gains tax bracket is 20% (or 23.8% with the Affordable Care Act surcharge). That is what you pay if you sit at home and watch the money you inherited grow, or if you are wealthy enough to have lots of money to invest. That’s very, very few of us.

The top “qualified small business stock” rate is [0%](mailto:https://www.andersentax.com/services/for-private-clients/business-owners-and-entrepreneurs/qsbs). That’s what you pay if you’re an early investor in an internet business (for up to $10 million or 10 times your gain, whichever is more) if you get in before the business is worth $50 million. So some Silicon Valley seed investors pay effectively no tax. This provision was supposed to help small time entrepreneurs. In actual fact, almost only tech-internet businesses take advantage of it, because the lady who runs a dry cleaner or salon has no idea this tax provision exists. And the types of businesses that regular Americans start — any service or farm business (or anything that’s an LLC) — are specifically excluded.


As Warren Buffett memorably put it in a [New York Times op-ed](http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/15/opinion/stop-coddling-the-super-rich.html) in 2011, “If you make money with money, as some of my super-rich friends do, your \[tax\] percentage may be a bit lower than mine \[under 17.4%\]. But if you earn money from a job, your percentage will surely exceed mine – most likely by a lot.”

Those who favor different rates for income tax and capital gains tend to argue that people wouldn’t invest if investment income were taxed at normal rates, and that it would stop job creation. There is absolutely [no evidence](https://www.cbpp.org/research/the-capital-gains-and-dividend-tax-cuts-and-the-economy) for this. Others argue that taxing capital gains is [unfair](mailto:https://taxfoundation.org/why-capital-gains-are-taxed-lower-rate/) double taxation. Whether this is true is [complex](mailto:http://www.taxanalysts.org/tax-analysts-blog/are-capital-gains-double-taxed/2011/10/12/169496), and depends entirely on what the underlying asset is and how long it is held. There’s an easy fix: either have a reasonable total minimum tax rate for the wealthiest Americans, as Warren Buffett has suggested, or make capital gains rates progressive. This would let average Americans who invest a little of their hard-earned money have preferential rates, but the very rich — who get the large majority of their income from capital gains — would pay rates closer to what others do.


The Trump administration and Congress rightfully put several other beloved and mostly far less expensive tax expenditures up for consideration. According to the House bill, the [mortgage interest deduction](https://www.forbes.com/sites/samanthasharf/2017/11/03/what-the-republican-tax-plan-means-for-the-value-of-your-home/#5837ff013c4d) will be reduced, the deduction for [state and local taxes](https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2017/business/tax-bill-q-and-a/?utm%5Fterm=.6d864bed8e58) almost abolished, and even a future tax on fancy healthcare plans is being preserved. (Other than the exclusion for health plans, these cost far less than the windfall tax rates investors have on capital gains.)

But those that most benefit the hyper-rich — the stepped-up basis for stocks at death, and capital gains treatment — will be maintained. In sum, this sounds like socking it to the fairly wealthy who work for a living, especially those from high-tax blue states, but sparing the billionaires. Because where else would Congress get its campaign contributions?

President Trump was elected to help the forgotten man, not the wealthy donors who sustain both parties. Time for his administration to begin to do that.

```json
[{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5014427/trump-taxes-capital-gains/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5014427/trump-taxes-capital-gains/"},"headline":"How Trump’s Tax Plan Hurts the People Who Elected Him","datePublished":"2017-11-08T16:20:11.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-23T18:09:22.693Z","description":"If Trump and the GOP considered capital gains taxes, the middle class wouldn't be adversely affected by reform, writes Anja Manuel","url":"https://time.com/5014427/trump-taxes-capital-gains/","keywords":["Tax Reform"],"thumbnailUrl":"","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Anja Manuel","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/anja-manuel/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/tax-reform/","name":"Tax Reform"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5014427/trump-taxes-capital-gains/","name":"How Trump’s Tax Plan Hurts the People Who Elected Him"}}]}]
```

