(CUPERTINO, Calif.) – A decade after then-Chief Executive Steve Jobs unveiled the first iPhone, Apple Inc was set to introduce on Tuesday a completely redesigned top-of-the-line iPhone along with two other new phones, as well as an upgrade to the Apple Watch and a higher-definition Apple TV.
Hundreds of journalists, analysts and select Apple fans descended on the company’s new ApplePark campus and queued up for entry to the first-ever event at the Steve Jobs auditorium, which is widely considered to be Jobs’ final product design before he died in 2011.
The new theater, never before open to the public, features an expansive glass-enclosed lobby, with a massive white stone staircase leading down to the auditorium. Inside, the decor is similar to that of Apple‘s stores, with hard maple flooring and tan leather seats.
Coldplay, one of Jobs’ favorite bands, was pounding through the sound system as the crowd got settled.
The new products and the holiday shopping season that follows are the most important for Applein years. The company has sold more than 1.2 billion iPhones over the past decade and ushered in the era of mobile computing, but last year had a substantial decline in revenue as many consumers rejected the iPhone 7 as being too similar to the iPhone 6.
Apple hopes the new high-end phone, expected to be called the iPhone X, will silence critics who say the company has lost its innovation edge.
The phone features an edge-to-edge display with richer colors and facial recognition to unlock the device without a fingerprint reader or physical home button.
The two other models, expected to be called the iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus, update the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus. They could also include new features, such as a glass back similar to the iPhone 4 that would facilitate wireless charging.
The phones will likely boast a steep price tag. Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi predicts the top-end model will cost $899, though other analysts expect it to top $1,000. That compares to a top base price of $769 for the iPhone 7 Plus.
Much of that added cost is driven by more expensive parts, like a higher-resolution display, 3D sensors and more memory capacity.
“Some of these components are just darned expensive. There’s just no doubt about that,” said Brian Blau, Apple analyst at Gartner.
Blau expects Apple to keep several lower-priced models in its lineup.
WIRELESS WATCH
Analysts expect the company to reveal an Apple TV that operates at higher resolution than its previous set.
The higher resolution could play into video programming efforts, which have shifted into a higher gear recently with two high-profile executives hired away from Sony Pictures Television.
The company is also expected to reveal more details about the HomePod, its voice-activated home speaker that competes with Amazon.com Inc’s Echo devices and the Google Home speaker.
Apple announced the HomePod in June and said it will ship in December.
Lastly, Apple is expected to announce a new version of the Apple Watch. Previous versions had to be tethered to a user’s phone in order to send or receive data, but the new version is expected to connect to wireless data networks.
Apple does not say how many Apple Watches it sells. Gene Munster, an analyst with Loup Ventures, believes sales of the watch could double or even triple because of the new connectivity.
But even a huge boom in one product and topping smart watch rivals include Fitbit Inc and Garmin will not move Apple‘s financials much, since the iPhone accounted for 63 percent of the company’s $215 billion in sales last year.
“It’s a really big deal for the wearables category for Apple, but it’s not a big deal for the company,” Munster said.
More Must-Reads from TIME
- Donald Trump Is TIME's 2024 Person of the Year
- Why We Chose Trump as Person of the Year
- Is Intermittent Fasting Good or Bad for You?
- The 100 Must-Read Books of 2024
- The 20 Best Christmas TV Episodes
- Column: If Optimism Feels Ridiculous Now, Try Hope
- The Future of Climate Action Is Trade Policy
- Merle Bombardieri Is Helping People Make the Baby Decision
Contact us at letters@time.com