--- title: Mark Sanford: Republicans Faltered on Healthcare Debate description: Washington has treated healthcare in partisan terms. It's time for something different. canonical: https://time.com/4715803/mark-sanford-republican-healthcare/ author: Rep. Mark Sanford article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2017-03-28T21:08:48.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:54:29.363Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Rep. Sanford: 'I Believe My Party Faltered' on Healthcare og:description: Washington has treated healthcare in partisan terms. I have ideas for something different og:url: https://time.com/4715803/mark-sanford-republican-healthcare/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta7dbba118180625b/6988bfbdfb4eacdc508913d7/gettyimages-649333788.jpg?branch=production&width=594&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 594 og:image:height: 334 og:image:alt: Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) (L) speaks about Obamacare repeal and replacement while flanked by Rep. Mark Sanford (R-SC) (L), Rep Jim Jordan (R-OH) (2ndL), Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) (2ndR) and Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) (R) during a news conference on Capitol Hill, o og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Rep. Sanford: 'I Believe My Party Faltered' on Healthcare twitter:description: Washington has treated healthcare in partisan terms. I have ideas for something different twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta7dbba118180625b/6988bfbdfb4eacdc508913d7/gettyimages-649333788.jpg?branch=production&width=594&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Rep. Mark Sanford: 'I Believe My Party Faltered' In the Healthcare Debate > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=4ff9b782-04d9-4aa8-956e-678702081336&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=4ff9b782-04d9-4aa8-956e-678702081336&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=4ff9b782-04d9-4aa8-956e-678702081336&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. ## Video: President Trump: It's the Democrats' Fault the Health Care Bill Failed [Watch (HLS stream): President Trump: It's the Democrats' Fault the Health Care Bill Failed](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/eX0Kvp6e.m3u8) (1:44)  _Published 2017-03-28. MONEY VIDEO_ by [Rep. Mark Sanford](https://time.com/author/rep-mark-sanford/) ## Rep. Mark Sanford Mar 28, 2017 9:08 PM UTC  Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) speaks about Obamacare repeal and replacement while flanked by Rep. Mark Sanford (R-SC) (L), Rep Jim Jordan (R-OH) (2ndL), Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) (2ndR) and Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) (R) during a news conference on Capitol Hill, on March 7, 2017 in Washington, DC. Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) speaks about Obamacare repeal and replacement while flanked by Rep. Mark Sanford (R-SC) (L), Rep Jim Jordan (R-OH) (2ndL), Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) (2ndR) and Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) (R) during a news conference on Capitol Hill, on March 7, 2017 in Washington, DC. Mark Wilson—Getty Images by [Rep. Mark Sanford](https://time.com/author/rep-mark-sanford/) ## Rep. Mark Sanford Mar 28, 2017 9:08 PM UTC Since [Republican](http://time.com/4712852/ahca-donald-trump-obamacare-repeal-failure/) efforts to repeal the [Affordable Care Act](http://time.com/4637918/jimmy-kimmel-obamacare-vs-affordable-care-act/) (ACA) have stalled, we have a chance to carefully consider what went wrong and what might come next. Allow me a few suggestions. One, give this debate the time it deserves. I’m not a wine drinker, but they say great bottles of wine need aging, and healthcare represents a most precious bottle for Americans. In fact, third world despots dictate, while in America we legislate. The back-and-forth built into hearings and legislative cajoling allows an idea to “bake,” as it’s transformed into law. This was skipped with the [American Health Care Act](http://time.com/money/4714600/obamacare-trump-administrations-nuclear-option/) debate, which was given just 17 legislative days before the intended vote last Friday. In contrast, the debate surrounding Medicare Part D saw 166 legislative days. The ACA saw 187 legislative days… and was still dubbed as “rushed” by Republicans at the time. Two, remember that people don’t care how much you know as long as they know how much you care. I believe my party faltered here in this debate. Avoiding the people you represent seems hardly the formula for signaling empathy or a desire to learn. I had seven town hall meetings over the time of this debate, and while some were a bit rowdy, I learned a lot. Most importantly, I saw how it’s vital we get this right. Washington has treated healthcare in partisan terms. Democrats passed the ACA on a party line vote; Republicans were going to return the favor. It’s time for something different. Three, it’s equally important that we keep the debate on healthcare — on healthcare. We shouldn’t rush a bill because it helps with the next one or to simply check the healthcare box. (This bill happened to have a 1 trillion dollar “pay for” that would be most helpful in the upcoming tax debate.) Nor should we rush it because it’s seen as a momentum builder for the new administration. Implications on Republicans’ ability to govern is not an advocacy point that sells on healthcare, and people have an innate sense on intentions. In crafting a bill and what comes next, I believe that there are many key tenets — and they happen to be found in a bill that Senator Rand Paul and I have offered. Here are a few: One, we have to make affordable insurance legal again. The ACA prohibited this. Things like essential health benefits and community ratings found in Title I represented central wiring in its construction. They were well-intended but fatal flaws because they drove up the cost of insurance for most in the individual insurance marketplace. They prevented insurance from being insurance. If you were required to buy a $1.5 million policy for your $200,000 home, would you buy the policy? In the case of healthcare, millions of young people said no, and this proved to be the fatal mathematical flaw in the ACA. Good insurance is insurance that works for you. Let people buy what works for them. Two, our healthcare needs will stretch well beyond a job; as such, it should be portable. Who would have thought a historical event would become a driver in today’s health insurance market? Yet that’s the case. In an effort to circumvent the wage and price controls of World War II, health insurance and employment were coupled. This is not so with the other things we insure, and along with keeping people with a boss they don’t like, it brings with it many marketplace distortions. Three, recognize the ways in which our bodies are simply temporary homes for our soul. They wear out and some of what they need is routine maintenance. In other cases we renovate from a flood or a fire. Health savings accounts allow us to save for the routine. You wouldn’t buy insurance to replace filters in your home, but you would buy it to cover for a fire. The healthcare debate has changed because of the ACA; there is already consensus in maintaining coverage for preexisting conditions or staying on a parent’s plan. But it’s now time for another change so people have more choice, the marketplace is included, plans are sustainable, and insurance can once again be insurance. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4715803/mark-sanford-republican-healthcare/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4715803/mark-sanford-republican-healthcare/"},"headline":"Rep. Mark Sanford: 'I Believe My Party Faltered' In the Healthcare Debate","datePublished":"2017-03-28T21:08:48.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:54:29.363Z","description":"Washington has treated healthcare in partisan terms. It's time for something different.","url":"https://time.com/4715803/mark-sanford-republican-healthcare/","keywords":["Healthcare"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta7dbba118180625b/6988bfbdfb4eacdc508913d7/gettyimages-649333788.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Rep. Mark Sanford","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/rep-mark-sanford/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta7dbba118180625b/6988bfbdfb4eacdc508913d7/gettyimages-649333788.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) (L) speaks about Obamacare repeal and replacement while flanked by Rep. Mark Sanford (R-SC) (L), Rep Jim Jordan (R-OH) (2ndL), Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) (2ndR) and Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) (R) during a news conference on Capitol Hill, o","caption":"Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) (L) speaks about Obamacare repeal and replacement while flanked by Rep. Mark Sanford (R-SC) (L), Rep Jim Jordan (R-OH) (2ndL), Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) (2ndR) and Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) (R) during a news conference on Capitol Hill, on","creditText":"Mark Wilson—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/healthcare/","name":"Healthcare"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4715803/mark-sanford-republican-healthcare/","name":"Rep. Mark Sanford: 'I Believe My Party Faltered' In the Healthcare Debate"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"President Trump: It's the Democrats' Fault the Health Care Bill Failed","description":"MONEY VIDEO","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/eX0Kvp6e/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2017-03-28T19:15:00.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/eX0Kvp6e.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/4715803/mark-sanford-republican-healthcare/","duration":"PT1M44S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/4715803/mark-sanford-republican-healthcare/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```