A federal judge appointed by George W. Bush took President Trump to task for his criticism of judges, even as he was writing a dissent that took Trump’s side in the disputed travel ban.
U.S. Appeals Court Judge Jay Bybee did not mention Trump by name, but he did refer to one of the “parties” in the lawsuit leveling “personal attacks” on judges.
“Such personal attacks treat the court as though it were merely a political forum in which bargaining, compromise, and even intimidation are acceptable principles,” he wrote in a dissent. “The courts of law must be more than that, or we are not governed by law at all.”
After a federal judge in Washington state — also appointed by Bush — ruled against Trump’s first executive order barring immigration from seven Muslim-majority countries, Trump called him a “so-called judge” in a tweet. He later called a panel of judges reviewing the decision “so political.”
Bybee said the ad hominem attacks didn’t help Trump make his case.
“The personal attacks on the distinguished district judge and our colleagues were out of all bounds of civic and persuasive discourse—particularly when they came from the parties,” Bybee wrote. “It does no credit to the arguments of the parties to impugn the motives or the competence of the members of this court.”
He was joined by Judges Alex Kozinski, Consuelo Callahan, Carlos Bea and Sandra Ikuta in the dissent.
- The Fight to Save the Salmon
- Inside the World of Black Bitcoin, Where Crypto Is About Making More Than Just Money
- The 'Great Resignation' Is Finally Getting Companies to Take Burnout Seriously. Is It Enough?
- Suddenly, Everyone on TV Is Very Rich or Very Poor. What Happened?
- Colin Powell Reflects on His Mistakes in Unpublished TIME Interview
- Business Travel's Demise Could Have Far-Reaching Consequences
- If the U.S. Spends Big on Climate, the Rest of the World Might Follow