--- title: U.S. Cyber Policy Makes Americans Vulnerable description: Current rules make the government overuse subpoenas, turning companies into the gatekeepers of civilian privacy canonical: https://time.com/4625798/donald-trump-cyber-policy/ author: Oren J. Falkowitz article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2017-01-10T12:30:05.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-23T02:35:18.346Z article:section: Ideas og:title: How U.S. Cyber Policy Leaves Everyone Exposed og:description: "The government wants to leave holes in our security so it can walk through them later" og:url: https://time.com/4625798/donald-trump-cyber-policy/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9719a45ed5c72f63/6988b4ddab6d7701fb6ac6b6/cybersecurity-internet-security-fbi-phishing-apple-hackers1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2400 og:image:height: 1350 og:image:alt: U.S.-NEW YORK-DISTRICT COURT-APPLE og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: How U.S. Cyber Policy Leaves Everyone Exposed twitter:description: "The government wants to leave holes in our security so it can walk through them later" twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9719a45ed5c72f63/6988b4ddab6d7701fb6ac6b6/cybersecurity-internet-security-fbi-phishing-apple-hackers1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # U.S. Cyber Policy Makes Americans Vulnerable to Our Own Government > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=b863d4bf-3bf9-4121-8cb3-77adfa46edcd&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=b863d4bf-3bf9-4121-8cb3-77adfa46edcd&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=b863d4bf-3bf9-4121-8cb3-77adfa46edcd&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. by [Oren J. Falkowitz](https://time.com/author/oren-j-falkowitz/) ## Oren J. Falkowitz Jan 10, 2017 12:30 PM UTC  Customers visit the Apple store of the Grand Central Terminal in New York, the United States, March 1, 2016\. On Feb. 29, 2016, a magistrate judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York adjudged that All Writs Act wasn't sufficient to order Apple to help the FBI unlock the phone of a convicted drug dealer. Customers visit the Apple store of the Grand Central Terminal in New York, the United States, March 1, 2016\. On Feb. 29, 2016, a magistrate judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York adjudged that All Writs Act wasn't sufficient to order Apple to help the FBI unlock the phone of a convicted drug dealer. Wang Lei—Xinhua News Agency/Getty Images by [Oren J. Falkowitz](https://time.com/author/oren-j-falkowitz/) ## Oren J. Falkowitz Jan 10, 2017 12:30 PM UTC There’s no phrase as feared in information security as “[zero-day](http://time.com/2972317/world-war-zero-how-hackers-fight-to-steal-your-secrets/).” Zero-days are vulnerabilities no one knew existed, until they’ve been taken advantage of. They got their name because there is literally “zero days” to do anything to prevent them. They are surprise-secrets—“unknown unknowns,” [to quote former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk). But if it’s the element of being unknown that makes a vulnerability dangerous, then it’s actually our own laws and policies that are making us the most susceptible right now. Our contradictory demands from tech companies and our inconsistent enforcement of lawsleaves the public largely unaware of how exposed they are—right up until they’re hit with the realization there’s a problem. Think of these regulatory problems as “policy zero-days.” They are creating even larger holes in our collective security than hackers themselves, who, as leader of an elite NSA hacker team Rob Joyce says, [much prefer email phishing](http://www.computerworld.com/article/3028025/security/defending-a-network-from-the-nsa.html). (The NSA prefers phishing, too.) You can patch yourself or your community into safety from [phishing](http://time.com/money/3901452/email-scams-spear-phishing/). You can’t patch a policy zero-day. But President-elect Donald Trump can take several steps to make our cyber policies consistent and, as a result, keep us all safer online. Here’s how. **Simplify Which Devices Law Enforcement Can Search** A federal court in Virginia [recently ruled that having a server](http://www.dailypress.com/news/crime/dp-nws-evg-child-porn-privacy-ruling-20160705-story.html) that hasn’t been patched with the latest security updates, the rough equivalent of skipping your Windows updates for a few months, is the same as leaving your windows open, meaning there is no need for a warrant to look inside it. If that doesn’t scare you, think about the last time you updated your phone’s software. If you’ve put off the last patch, did you just consent to a search? Earlier this year, the Supreme Court signed off on changes suggested by a little-known committee (the Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure to the Judicial Conference of the United States) to an obscure part of Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure called [Rule 41](https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule%5F41) that recentlywent into effect. In one fell swoop, the changes open the door for a judge to approve searches on computers and devices anywhere in the world, if those devices are using one of a number of common tools to protect privacy.This is the perfect example of a policy zero-day that companies can’t prepare for. Laws like Rule 41 will only exacerbate the overuse of subpoenas, which already dog American companies and force them to be the gatekeepers of what of their users’ data is and isn’t kept private from the government. In the recent San Bernardino terrorist attack, Apple ended up fighting for the privacy of all of its users as [the FBI tried to force a way into all its phones](http://time.com/4262480/tim-cook-apple-fbi-2/). In another case that shows how broad subpoena use has become, the government tried to prevent the parent company of a chat app called Signal [from disclosing a government search to its users](http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/signal-subpoena-privacy-gag-order/). In 2014, [the FBI fought Lavabit](https://www.wired.com/2016/03/lavabit-apple-fbi/) over its secure email app to the point the service shutdown. We gain nothing by making our communications less secure. It takes a lot of money and a lot of effort to fight these demands in court. Clear policy that would allow companies to disclose when they’re working with the government and greater transparency on what the government is looking for would only improve what they get out of searches, and it would relieve companies of the burden of litigating sensible rules for privacy for all of us. The rights of our digital lives are at stake, and those decisions deserve to be made in public, by our representatives. **Build International Rules for Data in the Cloud** In addition to navigating things like the [Great Firewall of China](http://time.com/4354665/china-great-firewall-innovation-online-censorship/), companies have to deal with dueling regulations from close allies. A privacy activist in the [E.U. recently sued Facebook](http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/06/13/us%5Fto%5Fintervene%5Feu%5Fvs%5Ffacebook%5Fcase/) for shuffling its citizens’ data to the United States, where it’s subject to looser privacy and search regulations. The very strengths of the cloud—that data is borderless and can be accessed anywhere—are now being held against companies on the web. It’s hard to be truly borderless when you have to treat data from different countries differently. Amazon actually has to maintain separate infrastructure and regions to match policy. President-elect Donald Trump can press for better international rules to give businesses the clarity they need to do their jobs. **Think of Laws as We Do Flaws** Prior administrations have developed a process to determine when to keep a vulnerability secret and when to disclose it. The entire process is put in place because of the realization that these secrets embolden criminals and foreign governments to wreak havoc on our citizens. Michael Daniel, President Obama’s Cybersecurity Coordinator, says the rules are a “[deliberate process that is biased](https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2014/04/28/heartbleed-understanding-when-we-disclose-cyber-vulnerabilities) toward responsibly disclosing (a) vulnerability.” The idea is that any flaw in Internet security is a flaw for everyone. This same process should be empowered to include the types of vulnerabilities that exist either by law or other governmental action to look at our policies with the same type of scrutiny. Vulnerabilities, after all, are a legal problem, too. Changing these laws and policies would engender respect and cooperation from the private sector, the group the government needs to work with if it’s going to stop costly, embarrassing and dangerous hacking. If we want to give the organizations tasked with keeping us safe the best possible chance to protect us all, we need to be clear about what we’re asking for. Good policy would also create a role for the private sector, which has some of the best talent in the field. The government wants to leave holes in our security so it can walk through them later, if it needs to. But of course, that leaves holes. Hacking methods are, for the most part, shockingly simple. That gives us hope we can fix them. But no amount of innovation can cover our policy gaps that are growing and growing. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4625798/donald-trump-cyber-policy/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4625798/donald-trump-cyber-policy/"},"headline":"U.S. Cyber Policy Makes Americans Vulnerable to Our Own Government","datePublished":"2017-01-10T12:30:05.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-23T02:35:18.346Z","description":"'The government wants to leave holes in our security so it can walk through them later'","url":"https://time.com/4625798/donald-trump-cyber-policy/","keywords":["the Internet","Technology","Hacking","cyber security"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9719a45ed5c72f63/6988b4ddab6d7701fb6ac6b6/cybersecurity-internet-security-fbi-phishing-apple-hackers1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Oren J. Falkowitz","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/oren-j-falkowitz/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9719a45ed5c72f63/6988b4ddab6d7701fb6ac6b6/cybersecurity-internet-security-fbi-phishing-apple-hackers1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"U.S.-NEW YORK-DISTRICT COURT-APPLE","caption":"U.S.-NEW YORK-DISTRICT COURT-APPLE","creditText":"Wang Lei—Xinhua News Agency/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/the-internet/","name":"the Internet"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4625798/donald-trump-cyber-policy/","name":"U.S. Cyber Policy Makes Americans Vulnerable to Our Own Government"}}]}] ```