With 75 years having passed since the Dec. 7, 1941, attack on Pearl Harbor—the surprise air raid by Japan that precipitated the U.S. entry into World War II—most of the aspects of that day have been thoroughly explored: the military strategy, the political maneuvering, the personal tragedies, the moments of heroism. And yet mysteries do remain.
And one of them, in particular, is downright spooky. Here’s how Craig Nelson describes it in his new book Pearl Harbor: From Infamy to Greatness:
The advertisements can now be seen in the New Yorker‘s online archive, both the main copy and the “tag ads.”
Nelson, who served as historical adviser for the new LIFE VR virtual-reality experience Remembering Pearl Harbor, tells TIME that he first heard this story “a long, long time ago,” early in his years-long research process for the book. It was included in a list of Pearl Harbor facts that had been compiled in the 1950s, and the write-up made it clear that the FBI had “a bee in their bonnet,” as Nelson puts it, about the matter. But further research revealed that there was nothing more to ad.
Get your history fix in one place: sign up for the weekly TIME History newsletter
His personal theory? That it’s definitely strange, but probably not a warning about Pearl Harbor. The numbers on the dice could represent many things other than the 12/7 date of the attack, and it would have had to be submitted to the publication oddly far in advance before the attack. (After the original publication of this story, a reader helpfully solved one part of the mystery, with evidence that the game itself did really exist—something that Joseph Bell’s passenger had, according to legend, been unable to confirm back in the ‘40s. “Snopes has apparently uncovered what the FBI couldn’t reveal to me,” says Nelson.) On the other hand, the U.S. wasn’t at war yet, so why would an advertisement talk about Americans spending time in an air-raid shelter?
So it’s no wonder that the ads provoked conspiracy theorists to wonder.
“I don’t quite believe if it’s a warning,” Nelson says, “but if it’s not—what is it?”
More Must-Reads from TIME
- Introducing the 2024 TIME100 Next
- Sabrina Carpenter Has Waited Her Whole Life for This
- What Lies Ahead for the Middle East
- Why It's So Hard to Quit Vaping
- Jeremy Strong on Taking a Risk With a New Film About Trump
- Our Guide to Voting in the 2024 Election
- The 10 Races That Will Determine Control of the Senate
- Column: How My Shame Became My Strength
Write to Lily Rothman at lily.rothman@time.com