--- title: AT&T-Time Warner Merger: Why It Should Be Blocked description: AT&T execs think their plan to take over Time Warner is too big to fail. But the proposed merger’s astronomical cost may prove them wrong. canonical: https://time.com/4547740/att-time-warner-merger-deal-prices/ author: Timothy Karr article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-10-27T14:57:50.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:45:58.436Z article:section: Ideas og:title: How the AT&T/Time Warner Deal Could Hurt Low-Income Families og:description: The merger might mean higher prices for Internet access og:url: https://time.com/4547740/att-time-warner-merger-deal-prices/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltfa72bae0e5457ae9/6988abce0a4a22b71d9cbd0c/gettyimages-617968926.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 4000 og:image:height: 2250 og:image:alt: Key Speakers At The WSJDLive Global Technology Conference og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: How the AT&T/Time Warner Deal Could Hurt Low-Income Families twitter:description: The merger might mean higher prices for Internet access twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltfa72bae0e5457ae9/6988abce0a4a22b71d9cbd0c/gettyimages-617968926.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # How the AT&T/Time Warner Deal Could Hurt Low-Income Families > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=eb094b7a-3db5-4ba2-9d7e-fd2785073094&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=eb094b7a-3db5-4ba2-9d7e-fd2785073094&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=eb094b7a-3db5-4ba2-9d7e-fd2785073094&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. ## Video: AT&T Buys Time Warner [Watch (HLS stream): AT&T Buys Time Warner](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/Gdyb6Ogj.m3u8) (0:46)  _Published 2016-10-23. With the AT&T-Time Warner merger officially approved by the companies, regulatory review—including confirmed Senate hearings (paywall)—will begin soon, and is expected to stretch on for much of next year._ by [Timothy Karr](https://time.com/author/timothy-karr/) ## Timothy Karr Oct 27, 2016 2:57 PM UTC  Randall Stephenson, chairman and chief executive officer of AT&T Inc., left, listens while Jeffrey "Jeff" Bewkes, chairman and chief executive officer of Time Warner Inc., speaks during the WSJDLive Global Technology Conference in Laguna Beach, California, U.S., on Tuesday, Oct. 25, 2016. Randall Stephenson, chairman and chief executive officer of AT&T Inc., left, listens while Jeffrey "Jeff" Bewkes, chairman and chief executive officer of Time Warner Inc., speaks during the WSJDLive Global Technology Conference in Laguna Beach, California, U.S., on Tuesday, Oct. 25, 2016. Bloomberg—Bloomberg via Getty Images by [Timothy Karr](https://time.com/author/timothy-karr/) ## Timothy Karr Oct 27, 2016 2:57 PM UTC AT&T executives think [their plan to take over](http://time.com/4543580/att-time-warner-deal-merger-why/) Time Warner is too big to fail. But the proposed merger’s astronomical cost may prove them wrong. The $85 billion deal, combining the nation’s largest phone, Internet and pay-TV provider with an entertainment and news colossus whose holdings include CNN, HBO, TBS, TNT and Warner Bros. Studios, would be one of the largest media mergers ever. The resulting enterprise would have an approximate market value of [$300 billion](http://www.theverge.com/2016/10/21/13363394/att-time-warner-acquisition-85-billion-deal). That’s nearly three times the value of Comcast after it [bought](http://www.reuters.com/article/us-comcast-nbc-idUSTRE70S2WZ20110129) NBCUniversal in 2011. For the deal to go through, AT&T and Time Warner need the approval of government regulators, especially those at the Department of Justice, who will vet it to see if it violates antitrust laws. But there’s another metric by which regulators should evaluate the merger: its impact on real people, especially low-income households and communities of color. If approved, the merger would saddle AT&T with a whopping debt load estimated to be $187 billion, according to industry analysts. AT&T took on tens of billions of dollars in debt last year when it completed its $69 billion takeover of DirecTV, a move soon followed by [price increases](http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Now-Merged-ATT-and-DirecTV-Raise-TV-Rates-in-Perfect-Unison-135907) for DirecTV and AT&T broadband customers. There’s every reason to believe that similar rate hikes would follow AT&T’s acquisition of Time Warner. But the deal’s biggest proponents certainly won’t admit that. “I think anyone who characterizes this as a means to raise prices is ignoring the basic premise of what we’re trying to do here,” AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson told investors during a recent conference in California. Stephenson and Time Warner CEO Jeff Bewkes went on a largely unsuccessful tour of media outlets to pump the deal and address its doubters. “This will be essentially a catalyst to more competition, more innovation,” Bewkes said during a stop at CNN studios in New York. “More competition leads to lower prices and happier consumers.” Stephenson and Bewkes are ignoring some fundamental math here. AT&T will need to regularly pay interest to service its massive debt. The telecommunications giant doesn’t print cash; it bills customers. In other words, to pay down its interest, AT&T will have to hike prices. It’s likely those cost increases would occur in its consumer-product markets, including broadband, where AT&T faces little to no real competition. It could also raise the rates it charges and restrict the offerings it makes to other cable distributors that carry channels like HBO and CNN, limiting what people can see and generating new costs that would be passed along to pay-TV subscribers everywhere. This trickle-down of higher prices would be felt not in the boardroom but in the living room, where working families are already struggling to keep up with escalating costs for Internet, wireless services and pay-TV. Higher prices would put Internet access further out of reach of the more than [30 million adults](http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/09/07/some-americans-dont-use-the-internet-who-are-they/) in this country stuck on the wrong side of the digital divide. According to U.S. Census data, this gap is most pronounced in African-American and Hispanic communities. People already suffering from generations of systemic racism are disadvantaged further by lack of access to the educational and work opportunities that are at the fingertips of those with high-speed connections. For the enormous amount of money AT&T is shelling out to acquire Time Warner, it could run super-fast gigabit-fiber Internet services to every single home in America. That would truly serve as “a catalyst to more competition, more innovation,” to borrow Bewkes’ words. But neither he nor Stephenson care about providing better, more affordable services to more people. These mergers aren’t about that. They’re about increasing the company’s control and increasing shareholder value. On that score Stephenson and Bewkes may succeed. For his part, Bewkes could get a [nearly $400 million](http://www.wsj.com/articles/low-key-ceo-jeff-bewkes-reshaped-time-warner-before-at-t-sale-1477250859) payout by exercising his stock options at the close of the deal. Enriching investors (themselves included) is Stephenson and Bewkes’ job. It’s the job of regulators at the Department of Justice to decide whether this deal’s alleged benefits outweigh antitrust concerns. There’s no doubt that this mega-merger doesn’t benefit ordinary Americans. People want reliable, cheap and fast connections to the open Internet. We also need a choice of providers, not a few bloated companies controlling access to both the Internet and the content that flows across it. The merger of AT&T and Time Warner is just too big and costly to accomplish that. For that reason, it must be blocked. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4547740/att-time-warner-merger-deal-prices/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4547740/att-time-warner-merger-deal-prices/"},"headline":"How the AT&T/Time Warner Deal Could Hurt Low-Income Families","datePublished":"2016-10-27T14:57:50.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:45:58.436Z","description":"The merger might mean higher prices for Internet access, doing little to help the millions of Americans who can't afford connectivity","url":"https://time.com/4547740/att-time-warner-merger-deal-prices/","keywords":["Tech","Telecom","Business topic","AT&T","mergers and acquisitions","Time Warner"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltfa72bae0e5457ae9/6988abce0a4a22b71d9cbd0c/gettyimages-617968926.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Timothy Karr","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/timothy-karr/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltfa72bae0e5457ae9/6988abce0a4a22b71d9cbd0c/gettyimages-617968926.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Key Speakers At The WSJDLive Global Technology Conference","caption":"Key Speakers At The WSJDLive Global Technology Conference","creditText":"Bloomberg—Bloomberg via Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4547740/att-time-warner-merger-deal-prices/","name":"How the AT&T/Time Warner Deal Could Hurt Low-Income Families"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"AT&T Buys Time Warner","description":"With the AT&T-Time Warner merger officially approved by the companies, regulatory review—including confirmed Senate hearings (paywall)—will begin soon, and is expected to stretch on for much of next year.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/Gdyb6Ogj/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2016-10-23T16:34:35.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/Gdyb6Ogj.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/4547740/att-time-warner-merger-deal-prices/","duration":"PT46S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/4547740/att-time-warner-merger-deal-prices/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```