--- title: The Economy: How Under-Confidence Hurts the Economy description: Americans are more fearful about the economy than many objective measures, such as the unemployment rate, suggest they should be. canonical: https://time.com/4545074/under-confidence-economy/ author: Peter Atwater article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-10-26T14:05:09.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-23T01:25:07.598Z article:section: Ideas og:title: How Under-Confidence Hurts the Economy og:description: 'Our perceptions, decisions and actions become very “me, here, now"' og:url: https://time.com/4545074/under-confidence-economy/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production og:image:width: 1200 og:image:height: 675 og:image:alt: TIME og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: How Under-Confidence Hurts the Economy twitter:description: 'Our perceptions, decisions and actions become very “me, here, now"' twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production --- # How Under-Confidence Hurts the Economy > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=4bedac56-e0f2-4335-b5d5-bfd5d8026fe4&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=4bedac56-e0f2-4335-b5d5-bfd5d8026fe4&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=4bedac56-e0f2-4335-b5d5-bfd5d8026fe4&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=4bedac56-e0f2-4335-b5d5-bfd5d8026fe4&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) by [Peter Atwater](https://time.com/author/peter-atwater/) ## Peter Atwater Oct 26, 2016 2:05 PM UTC by [Peter Atwater](https://time.com/author/peter-atwater/) ## Peter Atwater Oct 26, 2016 2:05 PM UTC Thirty percent of Americans are very fearful that they will lose their job in the next six months. That is the finding of a recent [Marketplace-Edison Research Poll](http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161013006528/en/Marketplace-Edison-Research-Poll-Shows-Americans%E2%80%99-Economic-Anxiety). Over the past 12 months, despite a drop in new jobless claims to a [43-year low](http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-economy-jobless-idUSKCN12D1KL), Americans’ anxiety over their personal economic situation has increased sharply. Today, more Americans are afraid of being unemployed than were jobless at the darkest moments of the Great Depression. Many economists will be quick to discount consumer anxious feelings, suggesting [workers are being irrational](http://time.com/4525227/unions-economy-inequality-election/). But behind Americans’ economic stress today are rich narratives that rationalize the fear. Grounded in negative perceptions encompassing age, experience, skill set, geography and many other factors, workers have woven together many reasons to be afraid. Much like we create stories that underestimate risk when we are overconfident, today Americans are doing the reverse. Thanks to _under-_confidence, Main Street is more fearful than [many objective measures](http://time.com/4534760/social-security-benefits-increase/), such as the unemployment rate, suggest it should be. While economists often focus on the consequences of rising anxiety on measures like [automobile sales](http://time.com/12799/after-two-frigid-months-for-auto-sales-dealerships-are-desperate-for-buyers/) and consumer spending, the impact of financial under-confidence goes well beyond how we act at the mall. When we are under-confident, self-interest and near-term time frames dominate our behavior. Our perceptions, decisions and actions become very “me, here, now.” Even more, as confidence is a cognitive condition, when we are under-confident, we routinely struggle with abstract thinking. As the two major perceptions naturally accompanying under-confidence—uncertainty and a lack of control—consume enormous cognitive energy, we don’t have the mental bandwidth for complexity. So it stands to reason that the under-confidence of “me, here, now, simple” could accompany—or catalyze—xenophobic, prejudiced and isolationist tendencies. Zero-sum thinking—in which we see opportunity as finite and something others seemed to have somehow gained at our expense—naturally arises as our confidence falls. Looking across the American political and social landscape today, it is easy to see many ways under-confidence is having an impact. The Donald Trump campaign has been driven largely by it, while the Hillary Clinton campaign has argued against it. At its core, the 2016 presidential campaign has become a referendum on “me, here, now” versus “us, everywhere, forever” thinking. Under-confidence is not only fueling division; it’s also limiting business investment and economic growth. A consumer-driven economy like the U.S. relies heavily on Main Street sentiment. As anxiety has risen over the past year, we’ve seen a slowdown in auto sales and restaurants like Starbucks and KFC have tied declines in sales directly to [falling consumer sentiment](https://www.ft.com/content/518f8cfc-4fbd-11e6-8172-e39ecd3b86fc). Left unaddressed, the environment is ripe for further deterioration as intensifying “me, here, now” economic, social and political thinking drives us further into despair. What can we do about it? Undoing under-confidence is slow and tedious work. Building trust out of hopelessness is a game of inches, best done one-on-one through grassroots efforts from within a community. Large, one-size-fits-all federal social and economic programs are an especially bad fit with that approach. No matter the outcome of the November election, federal policymakers need to come together quickly with their local and state counterparts to develop and facilitate grassroots initiatives in our most under-confident communities aimed at restoring hope. In some communities, these efforts should focus on basic issues of safety and security. In others, programs should target jobs. In still others, fostering local investment. Again, one size won’t fit all. Policymakers would be wise to look at cities like Detroit where civic, business and religious leaders came together to begin the process of rebuilding the city one block at a time. While national organizations can help provide critical resources, for confidence to be restored, hope and encouragement must come from within an existing community and grow outwards. In a “me, here, now” environment, externally-driven programs raise suspicion and frequently miss the mark, as most government programs are aimed at the symptoms of under-confidence—rising crime, domestic violence, high drug use, weak education etc.—rather than the underlying cause. Many economists and policymakers will argue that more immediate benefits to our economy will come from targeting incremental federal funding on infrastructure instead. Better roads and bridges will spur economic growth lifting consumer confidence along the way. I disagree. We’ve already seen how limited the benefits of extreme monetary policy actions have been. While great for Wall Street, soaring financial markets have done remarkably little to boost Main Street confidence. It is time to recognize that creating the appearance of prosperity doesn’t foster confidence. Rebuilding trust takes time. Time, however, is of the essence. Economic anxiety is rising again; and with the banking crisis a recent memory, the American consumer is especially fragile. Fear will spread quickly unless sentiment rebounds. With Americans under-confident, rather than our roads and bridges, it is trust that must be rebuilt. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4545074/under-confidence-economy/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4545074/under-confidence-economy/"},"headline":"How Under-Confidence Hurts the Economy","datePublished":"2016-10-26T14:05:09.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-23T01:25:07.598Z","description":"'Our perceptions, decisions and actions become very “me, here, now\"'","url":"https://time.com/4545074/under-confidence-economy/","keywords":["Economy","Economics","Money"],"thumbnailUrl":"","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Peter Atwater","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/peter-atwater/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/economy/","name":"Economy"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4545074/under-confidence-economy/","name":"How Under-Confidence Hurts the Economy"}}]}] ```