--- title: The Economy: How Under-Confidence Hurts the Economy description: Americans are more fearful about the economy than many objective measures, such as the unemployment rate, suggest they should be. canonical: https://time.com/4545074/under-confidence-economy/ author: Peter Atwater article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-10-26T14:05:09.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-23T01:25:07.598Z article:section: Ideas og:title: How Under-Confidence Hurts the Economy og:description: 'Our perceptions, decisions and actions become very “me, here, now"' og:url: https://time.com/4545074/under-confidence-economy/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production og:image:width: 1200 og:image:height: 675 og:image:alt: TIME og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: How Under-Confidence Hurts the Economy twitter:description: 'Our perceptions, decisions and actions become very “me, here, now"' twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production --- # How Under-Confidence Hurts the Economy > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=2955d69b-b1da-4515-a2cc-ae040e96c9b0&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=2955d69b-b1da-4515-a2cc-ae040e96c9b0&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=2955d69b-b1da-4515-a2cc-ae040e96c9b0&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. by [Peter Atwater](https://time.com/author/peter-atwater/) ## Peter Atwater Oct 26, 2016 2:05 PM UTC by [Peter Atwater](https://time.com/author/peter-atwater/) ## Peter Atwater Oct 26, 2016 2:05 PM UTC Thirty percent of Americans are very fearful that they will lose their job in the next six months. That is the finding of a recent [Marketplace-Edison Research Poll](http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161013006528/en/Marketplace-Edison-Research-Poll-Shows-Americans%E2%80%99-Economic-Anxiety). Over the past 12 months, despite a drop in new jobless claims to a [43-year low](http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-economy-jobless-idUSKCN12D1KL), Americans’ anxiety over their personal economic situation has increased sharply. Today, more Americans are afraid of being unemployed than were jobless at the darkest moments of the Great Depression. Many economists will be quick to discount consumer anxious feelings, suggesting [workers are being irrational](http://time.com/4525227/unions-economy-inequality-election/). But behind Americans’ economic stress today are rich narratives that rationalize the fear. Grounded in negative perceptions encompassing age, experience, skill set, geography and many other factors, workers have woven together many reasons to be afraid. Much like we create stories that underestimate risk when we are overconfident, today Americans are doing the reverse. Thanks to _under-_confidence, Main Street is more fearful than [many objective measures](http://time.com/4534760/social-security-benefits-increase/), such as the unemployment rate, suggest it should be. While economists often focus on the consequences of rising anxiety on measures like [automobile sales](http://time.com/12799/after-two-frigid-months-for-auto-sales-dealerships-are-desperate-for-buyers/) and consumer spending, the impact of financial under-confidence goes well beyond how we act at the mall. When we are under-confident, self-interest and near-term time frames dominate our behavior. Our perceptions, decisions and actions become very “me, here, now.” Even more, as confidence is a cognitive condition, when we are under-confident, we routinely struggle with abstract thinking. As the two major perceptions naturally accompanying under-confidence—uncertainty and a lack of control—consume enormous cognitive energy, we don’t have the mental bandwidth for complexity. So it stands to reason that the under-confidence of “me, here, now, simple” could accompany—or catalyze—xenophobic, prejudiced and isolationist tendencies. Zero-sum thinking—in which we see opportunity as finite and something others seemed to have somehow gained at our expense—naturally arises as our confidence falls. Looking across the American political and social landscape today, it is easy to see many ways under-confidence is having an impact. The Donald Trump campaign has been driven largely by it, while the Hillary Clinton campaign has argued against it. At its core, the 2016 presidential campaign has become a referendum on “me, here, now” versus “us, everywhere, forever” thinking. Under-confidence is not only fueling division; it’s also limiting business investment and economic growth. A consumer-driven economy like the U.S. relies heavily on Main Street sentiment. As anxiety has risen over the past year, we’ve seen a slowdown in auto sales and restaurants like Starbucks and KFC have tied declines in sales directly to [falling consumer sentiment](https://www.ft.com/content/518f8cfc-4fbd-11e6-8172-e39ecd3b86fc). Left unaddressed, the environment is ripe for further deterioration as intensifying “me, here, now” economic, social and political thinking drives us further into despair. What can we do about it? Undoing under-confidence is slow and tedious work. Building trust out of hopelessness is a game of inches, best done one-on-one through grassroots efforts from within a community. Large, one-size-fits-all federal social and economic programs are an especially bad fit with that approach. No matter the outcome of the November election, federal policymakers need to come together quickly with their local and state counterparts to develop and facilitate grassroots initiatives in our most under-confident communities aimed at restoring hope. In some communities, these efforts should focus on basic issues of safety and security. In others, programs should target jobs. In still others, fostering local investment. Again, one size won’t fit all. Policymakers would be wise to look at cities like Detroit where civic, business and religious leaders came together to begin the process of rebuilding the city one block at a time. While national organizations can help provide critical resources, for confidence to be restored, hope and encouragement must come from within an existing community and grow outwards. In a “me, here, now” environment, externally-driven programs raise suspicion and frequently miss the mark, as most government programs are aimed at the symptoms of under-confidence—rising crime, domestic violence, high drug use, weak education etc.—rather than the underlying cause. Many economists and policymakers will argue that more immediate benefits to our economy will come from targeting incremental federal funding on infrastructure instead. Better roads and bridges will spur economic growth lifting consumer confidence along the way. I disagree. We’ve already seen how limited the benefits of extreme monetary policy actions have been. While great for Wall Street, soaring financial markets have done remarkably little to boost Main Street confidence. It is time to recognize that creating the appearance of prosperity doesn’t foster confidence. Rebuilding trust takes time. Time, however, is of the essence. Economic anxiety is rising again; and with the banking crisis a recent memory, the American consumer is especially fragile. Fear will spread quickly unless sentiment rebounds. With Americans under-confident, rather than our roads and bridges, it is trust that must be rebuilt. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4545074/under-confidence-economy/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4545074/under-confidence-economy/"},"headline":"How Under-Confidence Hurts the Economy","datePublished":"2016-10-26T14:05:09.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-23T01:25:07.598Z","description":"'Our perceptions, decisions and actions become very “me, here, now\"'","url":"https://time.com/4545074/under-confidence-economy/","keywords":["Economy","Economics","Money"],"thumbnailUrl":"","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Peter Atwater","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/peter-atwater/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/economy/","name":"Economy"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4545074/under-confidence-economy/","name":"How Under-Confidence Hurts the Economy"}}]}] ```