--- title: A Mexican Perspective on the U.S. Election description: "Over the past year, Donald Trump has made anti-Mexican sentiment a primary driver of his presidential campaign." canonical: https://time.com/4518404/donald-trump-mexico-comments-election/ author: TIME article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-10-05T14:50:58.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-19T07:45:32.198Z article:section: Ideas og:title: A Mexican Perspective on the U.S. Election og:description: 'Trump’s assertions aren’t just offensive—they’re also empirically wrong' og:url: https://time.com/4518404/donald-trump-mexico-comments-election/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt0f553ca8e603ad99/6988a8a6f887dce6cbe97acb/donald-trump-mexico-comments-election.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 3000 og:image:height: 1688 og:image:alt: Donald Trump Visits Mexico og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: A Mexican Perspective on the U.S. Election twitter:description: 'Trump’s assertions aren’t just offensive—they’re also empirically wrong' twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt0f553ca8e603ad99/6988a8a6f887dce6cbe97acb/donald-trump-mexico-comments-election.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # A Mexican Perspective on the U.S. Election > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=2dc17978-0619-46de-85b8-cdac36868344&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=2dc17978-0619-46de-85b8-cdac36868344&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=2dc17978-0619-46de-85b8-cdac36868344&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=2dc17978-0619-46de-85b8-cdac36868344&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) by [Carlos Bravo Regidor, Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas / The Conversation Global](https://time.com/author/the-conversation-global/) ## Carlos Bravo Regidor, Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas / The Conversation Global Oct 5, 2016 2:50 PM UTC  US Republican presidential candidate, Donald Trump speaks during a press conference with President of Mexico Enrique Pena Nieto (not seen) at Los Pinos presidential residence, in Mexico City, Mexico on August 31, 2016. US Republican presidential candidate, Donald Trump speaks during a press conference with President of Mexico Enrique Pena Nieto (not seen) at Los Pinos presidential residence, in Mexico City, Mexico on August 31, 2016. Daniel Cardenas—Anadolu Agency/Getty Images by [Carlos Bravo Regidor, Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas / The Conversation Global](https://time.com/author/the-conversation-global/) ## Carlos Bravo Regidor, Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas / The Conversation Global Oct 5, 2016 2:50 PM UTC During the 2012 US presidential election, Mexico – or rather, the idea of Mexico – wasn’t an issue. Romney and Obama may have mentioned it during discussions on immigration reform, the border separating the two countries, or drug policy, but this was in passing, offhand. Mexico itself as a country was [not a topic of conversation](http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/debates.php). Back then, some of my compatriots [lamented the irrelevance of Mexico](http://expansion.mx/economia/2012/10/15/mexico-el-olvido-en-la-eleccion-e) in the political platforms and public debates of their northern neighbour, sad to see that Mexico – [indeed, seemingly all of Latin America](http://abcnews.go.com/ABC%5FUnivision/Politics/obama-romney-care-latin-america-mexico-brazil-cuba/story?id=17508488) – had simply fallen off the US radar. Looking back from 2016, maybe irrelevance wasn’t such a bad thing after all. ## Anti-Mexican sentiment Over the past year, Donald Trump has made anti-Mexican sentiment a primary driver of his presidential campaign. He has characterised Mexican immigrants as [criminals and rapists](http://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/2015/06/25/exp-presidential-candidate-donald-trump-immigration-intv-erin.cnn) and proposed [the construction of a border wall](http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/jul/26/how-trump-plans-build-wall-along-us-mexico-border/) that would stop “illegals” from entering the US. He has threatened to [roll back the North American Free Trade Agreement](http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Donald%5FTrump%5FFree%5FTrade.htm) (NAFTA) to stop Mexico and Mexicans from “[killing us on jobs and trade](https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/615866741994954752?ref%5Fsrc=twsrc%5Etfw).” Trump’s assertions aren’t just offensive – they’re also empirically wrong. On the connection between immigration and criminality, for example, it turns out immigrants are [less likely](http://www.nber.org/papers/w13229) to commit crimes than those born in the US. In fact, immigration may actually [contribute to reducing crime rates](http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/sp.2009.56.3.447) and have a [positive effect on economic growth](http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse%5F174349.pdf). What’s more, the supposedly unstoppable flow of “illegals” across the border has actually [been declining](http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/11/20/what-we-know-about-illegal-immigration-from-mexico/) for several years. In fact, the migratory balance between Mexico and the United States is now negative: [more people are returning to Mexico](http://www.pewhispanic.org/2015/11/19/more-mexicans-leaving-than-coming-to-the-u-s/) than emigrating to the US. But what about free trade? Well, it’s complicated, but factually, not all the benefit has [gone to Mexico](http://cepr.net/documents/nafta-20-years-2014-02.pdf). Nor are the bulk of US jobs lost since the 1990s attributable to NAFTA but rather to [competition from China](http://www.nber.org/papers/w21906.pdf) and [other factors](https://piie.com/publications/policy-briefs/nafta-20-misleading-charges-and-positive-achievements). ## Lack of vision How Mexico is portrayed in and by the United States is, to me, a rich subject. Mexico and the United States are profoundly integrated – the [depth](https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/growing-together-economic-ties-between-the-united-states-and-mexico) and [intensity of the ties](https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL32934.pdf) that bind the two countries are unarguable. But the everyday experience of this relationship stands in stark contrast with the way many Mexicans and Americans still see each other, more through their alleged “[civilisational differences” than through their actual common history](https://www.jstor.org/stable/40204191?seq=1#page%5Fscan%5Ftab%5Fcontents). North America might be many things — a geographic expression, a commercial bloc, a cultural laboratory — but it is not, alas, what Walter Lippman called “[a picture inside our heads](http://xroads.virginia.edu/%7Ehyper/lippman/ch01.html)”. Data abounds on the actual existence of North America as real place, but Mexico and America nonetheless lack a vision to provide it with meaning, a story to make it intelligible to average citizens in both countries. In other words, North America is a big phenomenon without a narrative to speak for it. On the other side of the Atlantic, there has been, as part and parcel of their process of integration, an idea of Europe. But on this side of the Atlantic, there’s been no such effort. We have lacked the intellectual and cultural infrastructure to know how to think of ourselves as belonging to a region that is larger than the sum of its national parts. The absence of this North American narrative has paved the way for someone like Donald Trump to mobilise anti-Mexican sentiments among sectors of the American populace who feel threatened by diversity, for whom Mexico and Mexicans have become scapegoats for their economic and cultural anxieties. ## Vacuum of political leadership But beyond xenophobia, the fact that Trump’s attacks have gone mostly unchallenged shows an alarming vacuum of political leadership on an issue of critical importance to both countries. Apparently, the North American project has no one to champion it anymore. As Roberto Suro observed recently at a binational seminar at the [_Colegio de la Frontera Norte_ in Tijuana](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/portalcolef/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/PROGRAMA%5FSeminario-27-y-28-de-septiembre-El-Colef-21.09.2016%5F10.59h.pdf), there has not been a clear and strong response to openly defend NAFTA – not in the Republican party, certainly, but neither have Democrats, the Mexican government, civil society organisations on either side of the border, or the Mexican-American community responded to the attacks. Trump’s falsehoods have been met, largely, with silence. This, despite the fact that most Americans [don’t seem to agree](http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/22/us/politics/who-hates-trade-treaties-surprisingly-not-voters.html?%5Fr=0) with Trump’s tirades against free trade, or even with his anti-Mexican rhetoric. Though public opinion of the United States’ neighbour to the south saw a gradual decline between 2005 and 2013, in the past three years [Mexico’s image has been slightly on the rise](http://www.gallup.com/poll/1624/perceptions-foreign-countries.aspx). In that sense, whatever happens in November, Donald Trump has already won. His campaign has successfully hushed the voices that could have spoken about the actual benefits of NAFTA. In previous electoral cycles, immigration reform was still a matter of proposals and debate; after Trump, it’s become such a toxic subject that it is simply no longer on the table. In all likelihood, the reputation of Mexico in American public opinion will go down again, as will NAFTA. In the end, Trump has brought anti-Mexican sentiment into the political mainstream and shown how electorally profitable it can be. Let us not entertain false hopes: this phenomenon is not going to go away after November. Even if Hillary Clinton is the next president of the United States, Trumpism – with or without Trump – will be a force to be reckoned with for the foreseeable future. [_Carlos Bravo Regidor_](https://theconversation.com/profiles/carlos-bravo-regidor-304971)_, Associate Professor,_ [_Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas_](http://theconversation.com/institutions/centro-de-investigacion-y-docencia-economicas-2755) _This article was originally published on_ [_The Conversation_](http://theconversation.com)_. Read the_ [_original article_](https://theconversation.com/is-that-really-how-you-see-us-a-mexican-response-to-us-election-season-66462)_._ ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4518404/donald-trump-mexico-comments-election/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4518404/donald-trump-mexico-comments-election/"},"headline":"A Mexican Perspective on the U.S. Election","datePublished":"2016-10-05T14:50:58.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-19T07:45:32.198Z","description":"'Trump’s assertions aren’t just offensive—they’re also empirically wrong'","url":"https://time.com/4518404/donald-trump-mexico-comments-election/","keywords":["2016 Election","2016 Election"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt0f553ca8e603ad99/6988a8a6f887dce6cbe97acb/donald-trump-mexico-comments-election.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Carlos Bravo Regidor, Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas / The Conversation Global"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt0f553ca8e603ad99/6988a8a6f887dce6cbe97acb/donald-trump-mexico-comments-election.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Donald Trump Visits Mexico","caption":"US Republican presidential candidate, Donald Trump speaks during a press conference with President of Mexico Enrique Pena Nieto (not seen) at Los Pinos presidential residence, in Mexico City, Mexico on August 31, 2016.","creditText":"Daniel Cardenas—Anadolu Agency/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/2016-election/","name":"2016 Election"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4518404/donald-trump-mexico-comments-election/","name":"A Mexican Perspective on the U.S. Election"}}]}] ```