--- title: The Brave New World of the Synthetic Human Genome description: Scientists are working to manufacture the entire human genome by adding together chemical nucleotides that form genes. canonical: https://time.com/4356581/synthetic-human-genome/ author: TIME article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-06-03T16:51:47.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:49:50.961Z article:section: Ideas og:title: The Brave New World of the Synthetic Human Genome og:description: How to reap the benefits and avoid the pitfalls og:url: https://time.com/4356581/synthetic-human-genome/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production og:image:width: 1200 og:image:height: 675 og:image:alt: TIME og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: The Brave New World of the Synthetic Human Genome twitter:description: How to reap the benefits and avoid the pitfalls twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production --- # The Brave New World of the Synthetic Human Genome > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=4c2ba9d1-1bef-4637-9d24-8376a65d214b&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=4c2ba9d1-1bef-4637-9d24-8376a65d214b&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=4c2ba9d1-1bef-4637-9d24-8376a65d214b&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ## Video: Angelina Jolie and Genetic Testing [Watch (HLS stream): Angelina Jolie and Genetic Testing](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/TB8g1r3J.m3u8) (1:14)  _Published 2013-05-15. Though Angelina Jolie's genetic test results are rare, she has raised awareness for how this science can help the treatment of disease_ by [Ameet R. Kini](https://time.com/author/ameet-r-kini/) and [Puneet Opal](https://time.com/author/puneet-opal-and-ameet-r-kini/) Jun 3, 2016 4:51 PM UTC by [Ameet R. Kini](https://time.com/author/ameet-r-kini/) and [Puneet Opal](https://time.com/author/puneet-opal-and-ameet-r-kini/) Jun 3, 2016 4:51 PM UTC Last month there were alarming news reports of a “[secret meeting](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2016/05/13/secret-harvard-meeting-on-synthetic-human-genomes-incites-ethics-debate/)” where scientists [discussed plans](http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/14/science/synthetic-human-genome.html) to create a synthetic human genome. These plans have now been [confirmed](http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2016/06/02/480466940/scientists-say-they-hope-to-create-a-human-genome-in-the-lab), and the project has been dubbed the “[Human Genome Project-Write](http://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2016/06/03/science.aaf6850)” (HGP-Write). The project aims to manufacture the entire human genome by adding together chemical nucleotides that form genes. Are we on the verge of a dystopian [_Gattaca_](http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119177/)\-like world where genetically engineered humans dominate, and normal folk are relegated to the underclass? Or perhaps more frightening, can we create human beings from scratch, using non-living material? Thankfully, the answer to both questions is no. The production of synthetic genetic material is not new. The [first artificial genes](http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022283672901465) were synthesized in the 1970s and were successfully incorporated into bacteria and other organisms to produce life-saving growth factors, including [insulin](http://www.gene.com/media/press-releases/4160/1978-09-06/first-successful-laboratory-production-o). What’s new is the ability to synthesize exceedingly long genetic sequences, culminating with the [synthesis](http://www.jcvi.org/cms/press/press-releases/full-text/article/first-self-replicating-synthetic-bacterial-cell-constructed-by-j-craig-venter-institute-researcher/home/) and transplantation of the entire genome of a bacterium. The genome of this bacterium is one million base pairs long, while the human genome is about 3,000 times longer. Scaling the technology to synthesize the whole human genome will take at least 10 years, likely more. If we do achieve the synthesis of the human genome, we are still far, far away from creating human life from non-living parts. The information in the genome is necessary, but not sufficient for creating life. The genome has to be packaged correctly, epigenetic changes need to be made, and the correct complements of enzymes and structural proteins have to be provided. Even if we get the initial conditions correct, the formation of life may represent the [edge of chaos](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2246621/) with unpredictable results. The production of complex life-forms (such as humans) may well be impossible. While the prospect of a fully synthetic human is in the distant future, recent advances in genetic engineering—through a technology called [CRISPR](http://www.nature.com/news/crispr-gene-editing-is-just-the-beginning-1.19510)—have given us the ability to alter our genes with astonishing ease. CRISPR can be used to make permanent changes in human genes, and these changes can be transmitted to subsequent generations. Many scientists have recognized the profound ethical implications of this technology and [have called for a moratorium](http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=12032015a) on making inheritable changes until there is “broad societal consensus.” This response to the CRISPR conundrum provides us with a roadmap to address advances in synthetic genomic technology. Synthetic genomics has many potential benefits including the production of new vaccines, more effective drugs and novel biofuels. But there are real concerns about bioterrorism and inadvertent environmental release, along with the ethical considerations of altering life. It behooves us to address these concerns and be vigilant and prepared for unexpected challenges. The Presidential Commission on Bioethics reviewed the field of synthetic biology and [identified](http://bioethics.gov/synthetic-biology-report) five guiding principles: beneficence, responsible stewardship, intellectual freedom, justice and democratic deliberation. All these are important ethical guidelines, with “democratic deliberation” being the one where we are most likely to fall short. Among some scientists, there is a concern that irrational public fear of novel technologies may create a backlash and result in unnecessary restraints on scientific progress. This concern is unfounded, and a secretive strategy would only serve to enhance suspicions of a nefarious intent. To their credit, the HGP-Write group has now promised “[public discourse](http://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2016/06/01/science.aaf6850.full)” in the planning and implementation of this project. As we enter the brave new world of synthetic genomics, an open and honest approach will help us reap the benefits while avoiding the pitfalls that surely lurk ahead. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4356581/synthetic-human-genome/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4356581/synthetic-human-genome/"},"headline":"The Brave New World of the Synthetic Human Genome","datePublished":"2016-06-03T16:51:47.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:49:50.961Z","description":"How to reap the benefits and avoid the pitfalls","url":"https://time.com/4356581/synthetic-human-genome/","keywords":["health","medicine","Science topic"],"thumbnailUrl":"","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Ameet R. Kini","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/ameet-r-kini/"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Puneet Opal","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/puneet-opal-and-ameet-r-kini/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/health/","name":"health"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4356581/synthetic-human-genome/","name":"The Brave New World of the Synthetic Human Genome"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Angelina Jolie and Genetic Testing","description":"Though Angelina Jolie's genetic test results are rare, she has raised awareness for how this science can help the treatment of disease","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/TB8g1r3J/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2013-05-15T22:31:19.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/TB8g1r3J.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/4356581/synthetic-human-genome/","duration":"PT1M14S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/4356581/synthetic-human-genome/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```