--- title: The Candidates Have to Get Real About Our Debt description: Big government has become unaffordable canonical: https://time.com/4292735/candidates-have-to-get-real-about-our-debt/ author: Michael Tanner article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-04-14T13:49:33.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T08:06:14.737Z article:section: Ideas og:title: The Candidates Have to Get Real About Our Debt og:description: Big government has become unaffordable og:url: https://time.com/4292735/candidates-have-to-get-real-about-our-debt/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltf611c03878c85a82/69888f1f0a4a223d809c93d5/making-money.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 5146 og:image:height: 2895 og:image:alt: making-money.jpg og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: The Candidates Have to Get Real About Our Debt twitter:description: Big government has become unaffordable twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltf611c03878c85a82/69888f1f0a4a223d809c93d5/making-money.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # The Candidates Have to Get Real About Our Debt > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=3cd36abf-9f38-4236-9d4d-b61403136a5e&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=3cd36abf-9f38-4236-9d4d-b61403136a5e&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=3cd36abf-9f38-4236-9d4d-b61403136a5e&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. ## Video: TIME Raw: Obama on Tax Avoidance [Watch (HLS stream): TIME Raw: Obama on Tax Avoidance](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/tB7JoQEo.m3u8) (1:18)  _Published 2016-04-05_ by [Michael Tanner](https://time.com/author/michael-tanner/) ## Michael Tanner Apr 14, 2016 1:49 PM UTC  Making money Making money Getty Images by [Michael Tanner](https://time.com/author/michael-tanner/) ## Michael Tanner Apr 14, 2016 1:49 PM UTC You might not know it from listening to the presidential candidates—either Democratic or Republican—but our national debt has not gone away. They have promised all sorts of tax cuts and spending increases, but the words “deficit” or “debt” hardly ever cross their lips. True, a combination of increased revenue and spending restraint reduced last year’s budget deficit to just [$439](https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/fsreports/rpt/mthTreasStmt/mts0216.pdf) billion. That may still sound like a lot of money—it is—but, when you consider that the deficit was more than [$1.4 trillion](https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/51134-2016-03-HistoricalBudgetData.xlsx) just seven years ago, it does represent real progress. But this year the deficit will top [$534 billion](https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/51118-2016-03-BudgetProjections.xlsx), an increase of almost $100 billion. And from here the tide of red ink keeps rising. Within just six years, by 2022, we could be back to trillion-dollar annual deficits as far as the eye can see. The deficit is the measure of just one year’s profligacy—add all those deficits together and you get the national debt, which currently tops [$19.2 trillion](https://www.fms.treas.gov/fmsweb/viewDTSFiles?dir=w&fname=16041100.pdf). That’s more than 102% of our gross domestic product. That’s right: We owe more than the value of all the goods and services produced in this country each year. Within a decade, the Congressional Budget Office warns that the gross federal debt will top [$29.1 trillion](https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/51118-2016-03-BudgetProjections.xlsx). And that’s the good news. If you include the unfunded liabilities of [Social Security](https://www.ssa.gov/oact/tr/2015/VI%5FF%5Finfinite.html) and [Medicare](https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/ReportsTrustFunds/Downloads/TR2015.pdf#page=221), the total debt could run to $88 trillion or more. **Read this week’s cover story:** [The United States of Insolvency](http://time.com/4293549/the-united-states-of-insolvency/) And what do the presidential candidates offer? Goodies for everyone and nary a tough choice in sight. Donald Trump has said tackling the national debt will be [easy](http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/02/05/bill-oreilly-asks-donald-trump-how-hed-tackle-national-debt). Yet he has put any reforms to entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare off the table, despite the fact that those two programs account for almost two-fifths of federal spending. Instead he offers vague nostrums about reducing “[waste, fraud, and abuse](http://www.nationalreview.com/article/431446/trump-waste-fraud-and-abuse),” a promise made by every presidential candidate since Jimmy Carter. And, while Trump would do little or nothing to cut spending, he offered the [biggest tax cut in U.S. history](http://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2015/sep/02/jeb-bush/did-donald-trump-propose-biggest-tax-hike-history-/). The Tax Foundation, which takes a favorable view of the economic growth spurred by lower taxes, estimates that Trump’s plan would add more than [$10 trillion](http://taxfoundation.org/article/details-and-analysis-donald-trump-s-tax-plan) to the debt over the next decade, before accounting for additional interest costs. In contrast, Ted Cruz, does acknowledge the need for entitlement reform and has called for a number of cuts in domestic spending. But he would offset those reductions with increases in defense spending and tax cuts. Using the same methodology, the Tax Foundation estimates that Cruz’s tax plan would reduce federal revenue by [$768 billion over 10 years](http://taxfoundation.org/article/details-and-analysis-senator-ted-cruz-s-tax-plan). **Read more:** [Our Debt Problem Needs Action—Not Empty Promises](http://time.com/4293748/our-debt-problem-needs-action-not-empty-promises/) While the Republicans want to keep spending while cutting taxes, the Democrats want to raise taxes while spending even more. Bernie Sanders has called for [as much as $18 trillion](http://www.wsj.com/articles/price-tag-of-bernie-sanders-proposals-18-trillion-1442271511) in new spending. Depending on the costs of his health plan, even with trillions in new taxes his plans would add between [$2 trillion and $15 trillion](http://fiscalfactcheck.crfb.org/adding-up-senator-sanderss-campaign-proposals-so-far/) to the debt. All of this makes Hillary Clinton look positively abstemious. She has [proposed](http://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-clintons-tax-plan-would-raise-1-1-trillion-over-next-decade-study-shows-1457028000) some $1.1 trillion in new spending (including targeted tax credits) over 10 years, but would pay for most of it with new taxes. Yet, while Clinton wouldn’t necessarily make the debt worse, she wouldn’t reduce it either. Both Sanders and Clinton rule out any serious effort to reform entitlements. They are both open to increasing Social Security benefits, which would all but guarantee an explosion of new debt down the road. **Read more:** [Debt Is Wonderful—Until It’s Crushing](http://time.com/4292738/debt-is-wonderful-until-its-crushing/) While some might say that paying for spending is better than running more debt, both debt and taxes extract resources from the private sector and turn them over to the government. As Milton Friedman pointed out, the true cost of government is spending, regardless of how that spending is paid for. Who pays the bill might vary, but the burden is the same. The [CBO](https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/51119-2015-06-LongTermBudgetProjections.xlsx) projects that federal spending could consume 34% of GDP by mid-century in its alternative scenario. Add in [state and local spending](http://taxfoundation.org/article/short-history-government-taxing-and-spending-united-states), and government will consume roughly half of everything that we produce. That’s an unsustainable burden no matter whether it’s “paid for” or not. It’s time for the candidates to stop playing Santa Claus. A massive tax cut unaccompanied by spending restraint and entitlement reform is irresponsible. So, too, are promises to spend more, even if accompanied by tax hikes. Big government has become unaffordable. It’s long past time that the candidates faced up to that. _Editor’s note: For his_ [_story_](http://time.com/4293549/the-united-states-of-insolvency/) _on the cover of TIME, James Grant based his calculations on everything_ except _what we owe ourselves—$13.9 trillion._ ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4292735/candidates-have-to-get-real-about-our-debt/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4292735/candidates-have-to-get-real-about-our-debt/"},"headline":"The Candidates Have to Get Real About Our Debt","datePublished":"2016-04-14T13:49:33.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T08:06:14.737Z","description":"Big government has become unaffordable","url":"https://time.com/4292735/candidates-have-to-get-real-about-our-debt/","keywords":["Debt","Economy","politics"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltf611c03878c85a82/69888f1f0a4a223d809c93d5/making-money.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Michael Tanner","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/michael-tanner/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltf611c03878c85a82/69888f1f0a4a223d809c93d5/making-money.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"making-money.jpg","caption":"","creditText":"Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/debt/","name":"Debt"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4292735/candidates-have-to-get-real-about-our-debt/","name":"The Candidates Have to Get Real About Our Debt"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"CNN Republican Debate: Watch Candidates Clash on Free Trade","description":"160310_CNN_Republican_Debate-freetrade","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/LsMPYRb1/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2016-03-11T02:14:44.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/LsMPYRb1.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/4292735/candidates-have-to-get-real-about-our-debt/","duration":"PT27S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/4292735/candidates-have-to-get-real-about-our-debt/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"TIME Raw: Obama on Tax Avoidance","description":"","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/tB7JoQEo/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2016-04-05T17:38:30.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/tB7JoQEo.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/4292735/candidates-have-to-get-real-about-our-debt/","duration":"PT1M18S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/4292735/candidates-have-to-get-real-about-our-debt/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```