--- title: The Long, Sexist History of 'Shrill' Women description: Those who have the most reason to speak up tend to be the ones told to keep quiet canonical: https://time.com/4268325/history-calling-women-shrill/ author: William Cheng article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-03-23T17:31:42.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-22T16:07:42.649Z article:section: Ideas og:title: The Long, Sexist History of 'Shrill' Women og:description: Those who have the most reason to speak up tend to be the ones told to keep quiet. og:url: https://time.com/4268325/history-calling-women-shrill/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt0ea6a52ba45e7bbd/69888c322dce014ddd9e852d/hillary-clinton5.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 4402 og:image:height: 2476 og:image:alt: Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton speaks during a rally at Rainier Beach High School in Seattle on March 22, 2016. og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: The Long, Sexist History of 'Shrill' Women twitter:description: Those who have the most reason to speak up tend to be the ones told to keep quiet. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt0ea6a52ba45e7bbd/69888c322dce014ddd9e852d/hillary-clinton5.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # The Long, Sexist History of 'Shrill' Women > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=41076e98-a959-41cd-87f5-a12068db80cd&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=41076e98-a959-41cd-87f5-a12068db80cd&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=41076e98-a959-41cd-87f5-a12068db80cd&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. by [William Cheng](https://time.com/author/william-cheng/) ## William Cheng Mar 23, 2016 5:31 PM UTC  Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton speaks during a rally at Rainier Beach High School in Seattle on March 22, 2016 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton speaks during a rally at Rainier Beach High School in Seattle on March 22, 2016 Stephen Brashear—Getty Images by [William Cheng](https://time.com/author/william-cheng/) ## William Cheng Mar 23, 2016 5:31 PM UTC In a [1926 survey](https://books.google.com/books?id=FkKhBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA35&lpg=PA35&dq=WJZ+1926+survey+radio+female+shrill&source=bl&ots=CXJwHLSyBb&sig=FhZ7cTtiltTbGfi96Bq%5FignPDSA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwili9LD%5F9HLAhUCMz4KHQ2aBoQQ6AEIHzAB#v=onepage&q=WJZ%201926%20survey%20radio%20female%20shrill&f=false) about talk radio, a ratio of 100 to 1 respondents preferred male hosts to female hosts. Women, these respondents complained, sounded “shrill” and conveyed “too much” personality. Ninety years later, and the battle rages on, word for word. Many unapologetically vociferous male politicians and pundits have lately said that Hillary Clinton’s [raised voice](http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/05/us/politics/hillary-clinton-speeches-sexism.html) during speeches somehow registers as, yes, “shrill” and simply “too much.” There’s a long history of men telling women to avoid rhetorical excess and to use their indoor voices. In ancient Greece, [public female vocality](http://blog.britishmuseum.org/2014/03/24/did-women-in-greece-and-rome-speak/) often bore associations with prostitution, madness, witchcraft and androgyny. In late medieval England, an outspoken woman would often be dubbed a “[scold](https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showpdf.php?id=14508),” someone who “could not keep her negative, or worse, insubordinate, words to herself.” In the late 19th century, when some women assumed the job of [telephone operators](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=njW70pofZsg), they took mandatory lessons on how to speak in soft, melodious and deferential timbres. In mythology as well as in reality, the phenomenon of female singing has resounded with precarity, from the seductive sirens of the sea to the prima donnas whose operatic prowess channeled, as musicologist [Bonnie Gordon](http://www.amazon.com/Monteverdis-Unruly-Women-Perspectives-Criticism/dp/0521120268#reader%5F0521120268) puts it, the “dangers of music exuding from the wrong mouths.” The advent of recording and radio technologies has only compounded social anxieties about women who dare speak. In a series of experiments at the [Bell Laboratories](https://books.google.com/books?id=azRpAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA19&lpg=PA19&dq=equal+to+men%E2%80%99s+in+loudness,+but+significantly+less+intelligible.%E2%80%9D&source=bl&ots=48a7%5Fj4EN%5F&sig=x5%5FvHSC0OQxpuSIIy4cu6xPV8C8&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiO85qVj9LLAhXBdj4KHYBkA4UQ6AEIHTAA#v=onepage&q=equal%20to%20men%E2%80%99s%20in%20loudness%2C%20but%20significantly%20less%20intelligible.%E2%80%9D&f=false) in the 1920s, researchers concluded that women’s voices were equal to men’s voices in terms of loudness, but considerably less intelligible. Some technicians chalked this up to the challenges of transmitting and perceiving high frequencies. But this reasoning seemed dubious given that, as researchers discovered, an instrument such as the flute sounded just fine. So one has to wonder: Were women’s voices deemed less intelligible because some men — and women — weren’t _listening_ to female voices as attentively as they could? In other words, were sexist presumptions of women as less intelligent responsible for listeners’ _perceptions_ of their verbal unintelligibility? An entrenched irony of public expression in American democracy is how individuals who endure systemic oppression (women, the LGBT community, people of color) — who might have the most reason to shout — tend to be the same individuals who are urged to keep their voices down, to stay calm, and to laugh a little (or “smile,” as [Joe Scarborough](http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/mar/17/hillary-clinton-facing-sexism-sexist-politics) and others have advised Clinton). Yet we’ve also seen what happens when Clinton does lighten up and laugh: she gets slammed for her “[cackle](http://time.com/4212492/hillary-clinton-spanking-metaphor/).” It’s a classic case of the “[double bind](http://time.com/4258976/disliking-hillary-clinton/)” for women in leadership. As Jay Newton-Small [writes](http://time.com/4206660/hillary-clinton-sexism-shrill-yelling/) in TIME, “words like _shrill_, _caterwauling_, _shrieking_, _yowling_ and _screeching_ are all associated with women — not men.” No, you can’t call someone a [sexist](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/isaac-saul/i-despise-hillary-clinton-gender%5Fb%5F9160682.html) just because they’re anti-Clinton. You can’t even call them sexist solely based on their idiosyncratic dislike of Clinton’s voice. But you likewise can’t look at the time-honored tradition of societies policing women’s voices and reasonably claim that sexism isn’t prevalent in this year’s election. This isn’t a single-person or single-party issue. And given that Clinton’s primary opponent, Bernie Sanders, is himself constantly belting out inspirational messages of gender parity and women’s rights, he shouldn’t hesitate to condemn the double standards surrounding who does or doesn’t get to raise their voice. It’s not that Clinton needs Sanders — or anyone — to rush to her defense. She’s perfectly capable of speaking up. But sexism writ large? That’s something to shout about. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4268325/history-calling-women-shrill/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4268325/history-calling-women-shrill/"},"headline":"The Long, Sexist History of 'Shrill' Women","datePublished":"2016-03-23T17:31:42.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-22T16:07:42.649Z","description":"Those who have the most reason to speak up tend to be the ones told to keep quiet","url":"https://time.com/4268325/history-calling-women-shrill/","keywords":["History","gender","politics"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt0ea6a52ba45e7bbd/69888c322dce014ddd9e852d/hillary-clinton5.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"William Cheng","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/william-cheng/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt0ea6a52ba45e7bbd/69888c322dce014ddd9e852d/hillary-clinton5.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton speaks during a rally at Rainier Beach High School in Seattle on March 22, 2016.","caption":"Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton speaks during a rally at Rainier Beach High School in Seattle on March 22, 2016.","creditText":"Stephen Brashear—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4268325/history-calling-women-shrill/","name":"The Long, Sexist History of 'Shrill' Women"}}]}] ```