This was supposed to be a great year to buy an election. Thanks to recent court rulings, after all, billionaires are allowed to spend freely to elect their chosen candidate. But so far, money has not seemed to matter. As the numbers reveal, there is little correlation between independent ad spending (which often comes from super PACs and special-interest groups) and primary results, especially for Donald Trump.
–MICHAEL SCHERER
[This article contains a table. Please see your hard copy.]
| PRIMARY AND CAUCUS WINS | MONEY FOR | MONEY AGAINST |
|---|---|---|
| ($ IN MILLIONS) | ||
| TRUMP 18 | $0.23 | $35.7 |
| CLINTON 18 | 9.3 | 3.3 |
| SANDERS 9 | 2.2 | 0.06 |
| CRUZ 8 | 13.8 | 7.2 |
| RUBIO 3 | 39.7 | 8.3 |
| KASICH 1 | 12.9 | 2.8 |
| BUSH 0 | 78.4 | 3.2 |
| CHRISTIE 0 | 17.9 | 3.6 |
| CARSON 0 | 3.7 | 0.01 |
SOURCE: CENTER FOR RESPONSIVE POLITICS
This appears in the March 28, 2016 issue of TIME.
More Must-Reads From TIME
- Why Cell Phone Reception Is Getting Worse
- The Dirty Secrets of Alternative Plastics
- Israeli Family Celebrates Release of Hostage Grandmother
- We Should Get Paid for Our Online Data: Column
- The COP28 Outcomes Business Leaders Are Watching For
- The 100 Must-Read Books of 2023
- The Top 100 Photos of 2023
- Want Weekly Recs on What to Watch, Read, and More? Sign Up for Worth Your Time
