--- title: Climate Change: Why U.S. Science Teachers Struggle to Teach description: Conservative values and a lack of education rank among the top reasons why many high school science teachers botch climate change lessons canonical: https://time.com/4214388/science-teachers-climate-change/ author: Justin Worland article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-02-11T19:22:10.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:56:19.245Z article:section: Science og:title: Why U.S. Science Teachers Struggle to Teach Climate Change og:description: Political values influence how teachers approach the issue og:url: https://time.com/4214388/science-teachers-climate-change/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production og:image:width: 1200 og:image:height: 675 og:image:alt: TIME og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Why U.S. Science Teachers Struggle to Teach Climate Change twitter:description: Political values influence how teachers approach the issue twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production --- # Why U.S. Science Teachers Struggle to Teach Climate Change > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=91c89d32-659c-4c25-819a-4f252120ec27&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=91c89d32-659c-4c25-819a-4f252120ec27&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=91c89d32-659c-4c25-819a-4f252120ec27&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ## Video: Plastic Waste Could Outweigh Fish In Oceans By 2050 [Watch (HLS stream): Plastic Waste Could Outweigh Fish In Oceans By 2050](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/Zn3u3iPo.m3u8) (0:50)  _Published 2016-01-19_  by [Justin Worland](https://time.com/author/justin-worland/)  ## Justin Worland Senior Correspondent Feb 11, 2016 7:22 PM UTC  by [Justin Worland](https://time.com/author/justin-worland/)  ## Justin Worland Senior Correspondent Feb 11, 2016 7:22 PM UTC Science teachers in the U.S. often botch lessons on climate change, hampered by conservative values in their community and their own lack of knowledge on the topic, according to new [research](http://science.sciencemag.org/lookup/doi/10.1126/science.aab3907). The study, published in the journal _Science,_ looked at the results of a survey of 1,500 public school teachers across the U.S. and found that 70% of middle school science teachers and 87% of high school biology teachers devote some class time to climate change. But the quality of those lessons can vary greatly from teacher to teacher. Nearly a third of U.S. teachers who instruct on climate change say that the phenomenon is likely caused by “natural causes” despite the fact that more than 95% of climate [scientists agree](http://time.com/4051338/climate-change-scientists/) that humans have driven global warming. “Teachers know it’s important to teach climate change,” said study author Eric Plutzer, professor of political science at Pennsylvania State University. “But based on our survey we think there’s a lot of opportunities for them to do a better job.” Conservative political identity was the strongest indicator that a teacher would suggest that climate change may be rooted in natural rather than human causes, according to the study. And even those who accept the science of climate change may teach about potential natural causes to avoid upsetting conservative members of the communities where they live. The vast majority of conservatives in the U.S. say climate change isn’t happening, according to a [report](http://www.people-press.org/2014/06/26/section-7-global-warming-environment-and-energy/) from the Pew Research Center. “Teachers are in a difficult position,” said Plutzer. “They often have to negotiate between the demands of scientific findings and the opinions and beliefs of students, their parents and other community members.” A lack formal education on climate change among teachers also contributes to confusion when it comes to teaching. The majority of teachers surveyed for the study never took a class on the topic in college. Furthermore, authors have also lagged in incorporating climate change into textbooks, according to the study. The findings also suggest that the debate over climate change in the classroom may be similar to the ongoing [debate over teaching evolution](http://popwatch.ew.com/2014/02/04/bill-nye-debate-evolution/). That issue has pitted religious conservatives against advocates of science for decades. “The goal of climate skeptics is very similar to the goals of evolution skeptics,” said Plutzer. “They’re not attempting to prove their point; they’re merely hoping to raise doubt — enough doubt to delay \[changes to education\] policies.” ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4214388/science-teachers-climate-change/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4214388/science-teachers-climate-change/"},"headline":"Why U.S. Science Teachers Struggle to Teach Climate Change","datePublished":"2016-02-11T19:22:10.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:56:19.245Z","description":"Political values influence how teachers approach the issue","url":"https://time.com/4214388/science-teachers-climate-change/","keywords":["climate change","Education"],"thumbnailUrl":"","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Justin Worland","jobTitle":"Senior Correspondent","url":"https://time.com/author/justin-worland/"}],"articleSection":"Science","image":[],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/science/","name":"Science"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/climate-change/","name":"climate change"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4214388/science-teachers-climate-change/","name":"Why U.S. Science Teachers Struggle to Teach Climate Change"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Plastic Waste Could Outweigh Fish In Oceans By 2050","description":"","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/Zn3u3iPo/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2016-01-19T23:57:32.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/Zn3u3iPo.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/4214388/science-teachers-climate-change/","duration":"PT50S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/4214388/science-teachers-climate-change/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```