--- title: Diners Don’t Care About Calorie Counts, But Restaurants Do description: New research published Monday on the effect of calorie counts on consumer and industry behavior show the impact may not be where we expect it. canonical: https://time.com/4096977/calorie-counts-restaurants/ author: Alexandra Sifferlin article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2015-11-02T21:00:06.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-22T12:16:43.399Z article:section: Health og:title: Diners Don’t Care About Calorie Counts, But Restaurants Do og:description: New research shows that while consumers aren't affected by calorie counts, the restaurant industry takes note og:url: https://time.com/4096977/calorie-counts-restaurants/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt7bd4f42cd6d47e04/69886f303c1639be6045a80e/burger2.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 6144 og:image:height: 3456 og:image:alt: 168066972 og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Diners Don’t Care About Calorie Counts, But Restaurants Do twitter:description: New research shows that while consumers aren't affected by calorie counts, the restaurant industry takes note twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt7bd4f42cd6d47e04/69886f303c1639be6045a80e/burger2.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Diners Don’t Care About Calorie Counts, But Restaurants Do > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=c042da49-faa2-4d0f-95a5-d4c9a3ecb0ad&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=c042da49-faa2-4d0f-95a5-d4c9a3ecb0ad&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=c042da49-faa2-4d0f-95a5-d4c9a3ecb0ad&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=c042da49-faa2-4d0f-95a5-d4c9a3ecb0ad&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) by [Alexandra Sifferlin](https://time.com/author/alexandra-sifferlin/) ## Alexandra Sifferlin Nov 2, 2015 9:00 PM UTC  NAILS AND FOOD NAILS AND FOOD Getty Images by [Alexandra Sifferlin](https://time.com/author/alexandra-sifferlin/) ## Alexandra Sifferlin Nov 2, 2015 9:00 PM UTC Knowing how many calories are in our fast food cheeseburger may not influence whether we get it anyway, but it might impact how many calories were in the burger in the first place. New research published Monday on the effect of calorie counts on consumer and industry behavior shows the impact may not be where we expect it. Thanks to the Affordable Care Act, chain restaurants in the U.S. with more than 20 locations—and other places like movie theaters—will have to list calories on their menus starting in December 2016\. In the meantime, many restaurants have already started providing this data, and researchers have been studying what role this has on people’s food choices. Two new studies published Monday fall in line with [prior work](http://healthland.time.com/2013/07/22/we-may-not-care-about-calorie-counts-but-the-food-industry-does/) that suggests calorie labels may actually have a bigger impact on restaurants than the people who eat in them. [In one study](http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/34/11/1893.abstract), published Monday in the journal _Health Affairs,_ researchers from the NYU Langone Medical Center gathered 7,699 consumer survey responses and receipts from people eating at McDonald’s, Burger King, KFC and Wendy’s chains in New York City and some New Jersey cities. They compared food orders in places that had calorie labels to orders in places that didn’t. The researchers found that the average calories bought by men and women between January 2013 and June 2014 was statistically unchanged from a previous survey of over 1,000 diners in 2008 when New York City had first required menu labeling. Overall, during the 2013-2014 period, people ate between 804 and 839 calories at restaurants with labels and between 802 and 857 calories per meal at places without labels. Before the cities began requiring labels, people ate about 783 calories per meal at labeled food spots and 756 per meal at places that didn’t label them. In general, consumers said they saw the calorie information and that it impacted the number of calories they consumed, but this effect declined over five years. People were less likely to report seeing the labels in 2013-2014. [In the second study](http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/34/11/1877.abstract), also published Monday in _Health Affairs,_ the researchers looked at data from 2012 to 2014 in MenuStat, which has the menu items of 66 of the largest U.S. chain restaurants. They found that chain restaurants that voluntarily list calories on their menus have an average of around 140 less calories per item compared to chains that do not list them. They found that in 2012, the average item at restaurants with calorie counts had 26o calories compared to 399 in restaurants that did not. In 2014, the average number of calories for an item was 263 for places that listed calories and 402 in places that didn’t. “If other chain restaurants follow this same trend once mandatory menu labeling goes into effect, it could significantly improve the restaurant environment for consumers,” said study author Julia A. Wolfson, a PhD candidate at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, in a statement. “This could get consumers to eat healthier without having to change their behavior, something that is a very difficult thing to do and sustain.” The study can’t confirm whether the restaurants with lower calorie counts already offered those foods before releasing data on their menus, but other research has shown that fast food fare has [improved a little through the years](http://healthland.time.com/2013/07/22/we-may-not-care-about-calorie-counts-but-the-food-industry-does/), though not by very much. Still, the findings don’t suggest that calorie counts are a bust, just that they might have a greater influence on the fast food industry than its consumers. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4096977/calorie-counts-restaurants/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4096977/calorie-counts-restaurants/"},"headline":"Diners Don’t Care About Calorie Counts, But Restaurants Do","datePublished":"2015-11-02T21:00:06.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-22T12:16:43.399Z","description":"New research shows that while consumers aren't affected by calorie counts, the restaurant industry takes note","url":"https://time.com/4096977/calorie-counts-restaurants/","keywords":["Diet & Nutrition","calories","Fast Food"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt7bd4f42cd6d47e04/69886f303c1639be6045a80e/burger2.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Alexandra Sifferlin","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/alexandra-sifferlin/"}],"articleSection":"Health","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt7bd4f42cd6d47e04/69886f303c1639be6045a80e/burger2.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"168066972","caption":"168066972","creditText":"Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/health/","name":"Health"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/dietnutrition/","name":"Diet & Nutrition"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4096977/calorie-counts-restaurants/","name":"Diners Don’t Care About Calorie Counts, But Restaurants Do"}}]}] ```