--- title: Republican Debate: Will Paul Ryan Be the Next Newt Gingrich? description: Ted Kennedy could teach politicians today a lesson about overcoming polarization canonical: https://time.com/4089106/budget-agreement-paul-ryan/ author: TIME article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2015-10-29T18:50:19.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:44:48.184Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Will Paul Ryan Be the Next Newt Gingrich? og:description: Ted Kennedy could teach politicians today a lesson about overcoming polarization og:url: https://time.com/4089106/budget-agreement-paul-ryan/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt0145339dd88044e2/69886e620a4a2230029c6c24/facebook-kennedy.jpg?branch=production&width=1120&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1120 og:image:height: 630 og:image:alt: facebook-kennedy.jpg og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Will Paul Ryan Be the Next Newt Gingrich? twitter:description: Ted Kennedy could teach politicians today a lesson about overcoming polarization twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt0145339dd88044e2/69886e620a4a2230029c6c24/facebook-kennedy.jpg?branch=production&width=1120&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Will Paul Ryan Be the Next Newt Gingrich? > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=9be7e8ea-b8c4-410b-9de4-6933c29347a9&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=9be7e8ea-b8c4-410b-9de4-6933c29347a9&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=9be7e8ea-b8c4-410b-9de4-6933c29347a9&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. ## Video: Know Right Now: Paul Ryan Elected Speaker of the House [Watch (HLS stream): Know Right Now: Paul Ryan Elected Speaker of the House](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/zN7HMMnQ.m3u8) (1:00)  _Published 2015-10-28. Wisconsin Republican Rep. Paul Ryan was elected speaker of the house by House Republicans_ by [Nick Littlefield](https://time.com/author/nick-littlefield/) and [David Nexon](https://time.com/author/david-nexon/) Oct 29, 2015 6:50 PM UTC  Simon & Schuster by [Nick Littlefield](https://time.com/author/nick-littlefield/) and [David Nexon](https://time.com/author/david-nexon/) Oct 29, 2015 6:50 PM UTC On Wednesday night, the U.S. House passed a [bipartisan budget agreement](http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/29/us/politics/house-approves-budget.html?%5Fr=0), which, if passed by the Senate, will end the extended partisan struggle that began with the 2010 elections, forestalling another showdown until after the 2016 elections. The recent political paralysis is reminiscent of a struggle that also began with an election. In 1994, Republicans with a radically conservative view of the role of government, led by Newt Gingrich, won a stunning victory that gave them control of both houses of Congress. In 2010, equally conservative Republicans captured the House and, in 2014, added the Senate. In both the earlier periods and today, the ascendant Republicans have sought to use the budget process and the threat of government shutdown—even government default—to force a Democratic President to accept their agenda. The so-called Paul Ryan budget—a definitive statement of Republican policy objectives—is essentially the Gingrich 1995 agenda reborn. It proposes to privatize and cut Medicare, block grant and cut Medicaid, block grant and cut the anti-hunger programs, make deep cuts in discretionary programs, and increase tax cuts for the wealthy. In 2011, Republicans were willing to use the threat of a default even at the risk of a world-wide financial meltdown to extort deep, long-term cuts in domestic discretionary spending, although they failed to achieve the radical changes in entitlements they sought. In 1995, Senator Edward Kennedy rallied his party to stand up for historic Democratic values. He brought a special mixture of political gifts to this fight—and President Bill Clinton used the bully pulpit and the veto pen to great effect. But another important key to success was educating the public. When the voters truly understood the Republican agenda, the political price of sticking with their program was so high that they ultimately backed down. But educating the public required a sustained effort. In 1995, scarcely a week went by when Congressional Democrats did not stage a rally, conduct a forum, release a study, or organize a floor debate to draw attention to what the Republicans were doing. When the government shutdown finally came, the building blocks of public understanding of what was at stake were already in place. By contrast, the Democratic effort since 2010 has been less effective. In _The Center Holds_, Jonathan Alter reports that when focus groups were asked about the Ryan budget provisions, the participants’ primary reaction was disbelief. They simply could not fathom the idea that any politician would propose such a program. In the new budget deal, Republicans suspended efforts to force through major entitlement change and allowed a temporary, partial add-back of some domestic discretionary spending. But the remaining deep, long-term cuts in discretionary spending would, among other misguided policies, restrict the path to college for low income students, reduce access to Head Start for disadvantaged children, slow scientific research, and continue to ignore crumbling infrastructure. Essential public needs will continue to be starved, and a renewed effort to push through radical changes in social entitlement and safety net programs has only been deferred. It’s likely that the public understands none of this, and Democrats need to make them a focus of the presidential election; if a Republican president is elected in 2016, enactment of the Ryan budget will likely be the first order of business for the new Congress. The pressing national problems we face require new solutions. As Senator Kennedy understood, very little becomes law without bipartisan support. Even during the polarized environment of the Gingrich Congresses, Kennedy was able, against all odds, to secure passage of a minimum wage increase, a ground-breaking health insurance reform bill, and the largest health entitlement expansion since Medicare and Medicaid—the Child Health Insurance Program. Kennedy was a master of energizing the public and the party. But two additional keys to his success are often lacking today. First, there were the strong personal relations that he built with colleagues on both sides of the aisle. His partnership with Orrin Hatch is well known, but he was also able to strike up alliances on a wide range of issues with Republican senators as diverse as Strom Thurmond, Pete Domenici, and Trent Lott, among many others. When Kennedy partnered with a Republican, it was because they had a common interest in an issue, not because Kennedy charmed them. But the personal relationships and trust he built made the alliances possible and the necessary compromises more palatable. And that was the second key to Kennedy’s success: He recognized that compromise was necessary—not on the ultimate objective but on the means to achieve it. He was willing to settle for a half a loaf—or even a slice if that was the best he could get—but he always aimed high and never compromised his principles. As people of good will on both sides of the aisle struggle to navigate today’s troubled political waters, Kennedy’s leadership has much to teach them. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4089106/budget-agreement-paul-ryan/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4089106/budget-agreement-paul-ryan/"},"headline":"Will Paul Ryan Be the Next Newt Gingrich?","datePublished":"2015-10-29T18:50:19.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:44:48.184Z","description":"Ted Kennedy could teach politicians today a lesson about overcoming polarization","url":"https://time.com/4089106/budget-agreement-paul-ryan/","keywords":["Books","politics"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt0145339dd88044e2/69886e620a4a2230029c6c24/facebook-kennedy.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Nick Littlefield","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/nick-littlefield/"},{"@type":"Person","name":"David Nexon","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/david-nexon/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt0145339dd88044e2/69886e620a4a2230029c6c24/facebook-kennedy.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"facebook-kennedy.jpg","caption":"","creditText":"Simon & Schuster","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/books/","name":"Books"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4089106/budget-agreement-paul-ryan/","name":"Will Paul Ryan Be the Next Newt Gingrich?"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Know Right Now: Paul Ryan Elected Speaker of the House","description":"Wisconsin Republican Rep. Paul Ryan was elected speaker of the house by House Republicans","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/zN7HMMnQ/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2015-10-28T19:33:28.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/zN7HMMnQ.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/4089106/budget-agreement-paul-ryan/","duration":"PT1M","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/4089106/budget-agreement-paul-ryan/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```