--- title: Anger and Partisanship Dominated Brett Kavanaugh's Hearings description: Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh stuck to a script of teamwork and impartiality, but senators undermined that image during his hearing. canonical: https://time.com/5386443/brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court-hearing-partisan-protest/ author: Tessa Berenson article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2018-09-04T21:04:43.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-10-13T07:53:06.899Z article:section: Politics og:title: Anger and Partisanship Dominated Day One of Brett Kavanaugh's Hearings og:description: Even as the nominee stuck to the script. og:url: https://time.com/5386443/brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court-hearing-partisan-protest/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt313d65d7b0866d69/69893969ab6d7725596b395a/cm_kavanaugh_dc_09_04_18_0840.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2405 og:image:height: 1353 og:image:alt: cm_Kavanaugh_DC_09_04_18_0840 og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Anger and Partisanship Dominated Day One of Brett Kavanaugh's Hearings twitter:description: Even as the nominee stuck to the script. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt313d65d7b0866d69/69893969ab6d7725596b395a/cm_kavanaugh_dc_09_04_18_0840.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Anger and Partisanship Dominated Day One of Brett Kavanaugh's Hearings > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=f9f5b9f0-829f-43b5-a578-470b9dc0f2bd&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=f9f5b9f0-829f-43b5-a578-470b9dc0f2bd&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=f9f5b9f0-829f-43b5-a578-470b9dc0f2bd&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=f9f5b9f0-829f-43b5-a578-470b9dc0f2bd&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) ## Video: Democrats Demand Postponement of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh Hearing [Watch (HLS stream): Democrats Demand Postponement of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh Hearing](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/XBjvkPlb.m3u8) (3:00)  _Published 2018-09-04. Democrats Demand Postponement of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh Hearing_  by [Tessa Berenson](https://time.com/author/tessa-berenson/)  ## Tessa Berenson Sep 4, 2018 9:04 PM UTC  by [Tessa Berenson](https://time.com/author/tessa-berenson/)  ## Tessa Berenson Sep 4, 2018 9:04 PM UTC When Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh finally delivered his opening statement late Tuesday afternoon**,** he pledged to be a “team player.” “If confirmed to the Court, I would be part of a Team of Nine, committed to deciding cases according to the Constitution and laws of the United States,” he said. “I would always strive to be a team player on the Team of Nine.” Kavanaugh’s invocation of the lofty ideals of teamwork in partnership marked a stark contrast to the stunning partisanship and rancor that dominated the first day of his hearings. Even as the nominee stuck to the script that has successfully guided predecessors from both parties to the nation’s highest court, Democratic senators were prepared to show just how much they think the norms have been broken. Within minutes of Republican Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley beginning the session Tuesday morning, Democratis Sen. Kamala Harris of California cut in, arguing that [she hadn’t had enough time to review](http://time.com/5385927/brett-kavanaugh-confirmation-hearings/) more than 40,000 documents on Kavanaugh that were released Monday night. “We can not possibly move forward with this hearing,” Harris said. As Grassley ruled that her motion was out of order, she fired back, “If we cannot be recognized, I move to adjourn.” For more than an hour, the hearing went completely off the rails as Harris and each of the other nine Democratic members of the committee talked over Grassley’s attempts to begin his opening statement, criticizing the document review process and demanding to delay the hearing for more time to review Kavanaugh’s record. “We are rushing through this process in a way that is unnecessary,” said New Jersey Democrat Cory Booker. President Donald Trump highlighted the Democratic objections in tweets Friday evening, arguing that they were a “display of how mean, angry, and despicable the other side is.” > [](https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1037078251095687174) > [](https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1037078254845390849) Both sides could make a point about transparency using numbers. The committee has received more documents about Kavanaugh than any previous Supreme Court nominee, but those more than 400,000 documents make up just 10% of his record, and don’t include records from his time working [as staff secretary in George W. Bush’s White House](http://time.com/5386461/brett-kavanaugh-confirmation-hearings-bush/). Senators on both sides of the aisle bristled at each other, with little sign of collegiality or the team mentality that Kavanaugh — or “Coach K” — promotes when he coaches his daughter’s basketball team, according to a letter from team parents cited by Republican Sen. Jeff Flake of Arizona. Republican Sen. John Cornyn of Texas said the hearing had devolved into “mob rule” by the Democrats. Long-serving Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont lamented the way the nomination was playing out. “I’m just sorry to see the Senate Judiciary Committee descend this way,” he said. Overseeing the chaos, Grassley let the Democrats vent for more than an hour, but wouldn’t call a vote on a motion to adjourn the hearing. “If people have got something to say, this chairman is going to let them say it,” he said. “But it’s pretty boring to hear the same thing all the time.” Later, as Cornyn complained that Democrats were running over their 10-minute allotment for opening statements, Grassley sighed, “I let the committee run me this time.” Much of the Democrats’ frustration may be exacerbated by the fact that they likely [won’t be able to prevent Kavanaugh from being confirmed](http://time.com/5363918/supreme-court-brett-kavanaugh-conservative-bloc/). If Republicans stick together, they can push him through with a simple majority without any votes from the other side. Loudly and publicly voicing opposition is the only real recourse Democrats have to try to affect the outcome. **Read More:** [_Democrats Want to Stop Brett Kavanaugh. They May Be Out of Options_](http://time.com/5382872/democrats-cant-stop-brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court/?xid=tcoshare) Republicans on the committee charged that Democrats were following a game plan. Illinois Senator Dick Durbin, the No. 2 Democrat in the Senate, confirmed that there was a conference call over the weekend for Democrats to map out their strategy for the hearing. “There are always many conference calls (and meetings, etc.) before Supreme Court confirmation hearings,” a Democratic aide told TIME in an email. “There has been a lot to talk about in the last several days, including over the long holiday weekend.” While Kavanaugh said that a judge must be “a neutral and impartial arbiter who favors no litigant or policy” and that he does not “decide cases based on personal or policy preferences,” the controversial president who nominated him hung heavy over many of the Democrats’ statements and Tuesday’s proceedings demonstrated what a uniquely political fight Kavanaugh’s nomination has become. It is “ultimately an effort to re-litigate the last presidential election,” said Republican Sen. Mike Crapo of Idaho. Tensions in the hearing room, already high among the senators on the dais, were amplified by near-constant interruptions by protesters from the seats reserved for spectators in the back. As the committee bickered up front, dozens of protesters were removed throughout the day for standing up and yelling during the proceedings. “Kavanaugh is a danger to the future of America!” one protester cried. “My daughter deserves the right to choose!” “Moving forward with this nomination is against everything we stand for as a nation!” yelled another protester wearing a shirt that said “spiritual gangster” on it. Multiple disruptions came from people who said they had preexisting conditions and were worried about their healthcare coverage. A group of women wearing red handmaids’ robes from the television show “The Handmaid’s Tale” kept a silent vigil outside the hearing room as people entered in the morning; as other demonstrators were escorted out throughout the day, those in the hearing room could still hear them chanting “Hell nah, Kavanaugh!” outside. In fact, irritation with disruptive protesters became one of the only issues that sparked agreement between political parties during the day. Democrat Leahy said he wouldn’t keep reading his opening statement during the interruptions. “I don’t care whose side they’re on,” he said. Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah complained about the “insolence” of the protesters and said, “These people are so out of line they shouldn’t even be allowed into the doggone room.” Throughout the chaos emanating from both the front and back of the room, Kavanaugh sat quietly at his desk facing the senators, in the eye of the storm. “The Supreme Court must never, never be viewed as a partisan institution,” Kavanaugh said during his opening statement, which didn’t begin until just before 5 pm. “The Justices on the Supreme Court do not sit on opposite sides of an aisle.” It was a rosy sentiment, and one that was undermined by the nearly seven hours of highly political fighting that had preceded it. ## Transcript Mister Chairman. I'd like to be recognized to ask a question before we proceed. The committee received just last night, less than 15 hours ago, 42, 000 pages of documents that we have not had an opportunity to review or read or analyze. You are out of order I will proceed. Congresswoman We cannot possibly move forward mister chairman with this hearing. We have not been given the opportunity to have a meaningful hearing on this nominee. Chairman I extend a very warm welcome to judge Kavanaugh to his wife Ashley. Congressman Mister Chairman if we cannot be recognized I move to adjounre. Mister Chairman I move to adjourne. Chairman The American people need to hear directly from judge Kavanaugh [ APPLAUSE ] Mister chairman, I move to adjourn. [ APPLAUSE ] Mister chairman, we have been denied, we have been denied real access to the documents we need to advise and to send. Mister chairman, regular orders called. Which turns this hearing into a charade and mockery of our. Well- And Mister Chairman, I therefore move to adjourn this hearing. Okay. This is a mockery and a travesty of justice! This is an attack against justice and the lawful act! Cancel Brett Kavanaugh! Adjourn the hearing! [ INAUDIBLE ] Some assurance of confidentiality- [ INAUDIBLE ] A president could not expect to receive the full and frank submissons of facts and opinions upon which the effective discharge of his duties depends, end of quote. Mr. Chairman, I appeal to be recognized on your sense of decency and integrity Even the documents you have requested, Mr. Chairman, even the ones that you said, the limited documents you have requested, this committee has not received, and the documents, we have, you [ CROSSTALK ] should be transparent. This committee, sir, is a violation of even the values I've heard you talk about time and time again. The ideals that we should have, what is the rush? What are we trying to hide by not having the documents out front? What is the rush? What are we hiding by not letting those documents come out? Sir, this committee is a violation of the values that we as a committee have striven for; transparency. We are rushing through this process in a way that is unnecessary. And I appeal for the motion to at least be voted on. Mr. Chairman. At least let's have a vote because when we wrote you a letter on August 24, Senator. Asking to have a meeting on this issue, you denied us, Even the right to meet. So here we are, having a meeting, let's at least debate this issue, let's at least call this for a vote. Senator. I appeal to your sense of fairness and decency, your commitments that you've made to transparency. This violates what you have even said and called for sir. You've called for. Documents, you yourself, limited documents. We thought there should be more. We have not received the documents that you have even called for. So sir, based upon your own principles, your own values, I call for at least to have a debate or a vote on these issues, and not for us to rush through this process. [ APPLAUSE ] ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5386443/brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court-hearing-partisan-protest/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5386443/brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court-hearing-partisan-protest/"},"headline":"Anger and Partisanship Dominated Day One of Brett Kavanaugh's Hearings","datePublished":"2018-09-04T21:04:43.000Z","dateModified":"2026-10-13T07:53:06.899Z","description":"Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh stuck to a script of teamwork and impartiality, but senators undermined that image during his hearing.","url":"https://time.com/5386443/brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court-hearing-partisan-protest/","keywords":["Congress","Supreme Court","justice","Brett Kavanaugh"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt313d65d7b0866d69/69893969ab6d7725596b395a/cm_kavanaugh_dc_09_04_18_0840.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Tessa Berenson","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/tessa-berenson/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt313d65d7b0866d69/69893969ab6d7725596b395a/cm_kavanaugh_dc_09_04_18_0840.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"cm_Kavanaugh_DC_09_04_18_0840","caption":"Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh appears before the Senate Judiciary Committee during his Supreme Court confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill, September 4, 2018 in Washington, DC.","creditText":"Christopher Morris—VII for TIME","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/congress/","name":"Congress"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5386443/brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court-hearing-partisan-protest/","name":"Anger and Partisanship Dominated Day One of Brett Kavanaugh's Hearings"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Democrats Demand Postponement of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh Hearing","description":"Democrats Demand Postponement of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh Hearing","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/XBjvkPlb/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2018-09-04T15:40:15.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/XBjvkPlb.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/5386443/brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court-hearing-partisan-protest/","duration":"PT3M","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/5386443/brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court-hearing-partisan-protest/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```