--- title: The GOP Tax Reform Plan Is a Corporate Sellout description: Two Senate staffers who negotiated with Pres. Ronald Reagan on his tax plan say that the 2017 Republican bill harms working class Americans canonical: https://time.com/5005163/2017-tax-reform-plan-republican-trump/ author: TIME article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2017-11-01T16:50:32.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-04-30T11:03:03.396Z article:section: Ideas og:title: We Worked on Tax Reform Under Reagan. The GOP Plan Is a Corporate Sellout og:description: "None of this helps the economy or the working people who rely on it" og:url: https://time.com/5005163/2017-tax-reform-plan-republican-trump/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte6faffa17b819302/6988e429cf40a83efcc4a08c/ronald-reagan-donald-trump-2017-tax-reform-plan-republican-gop.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2400 og:image:height: 1350 og:image:alt: Ronald Reagan, Donald Trump og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: We Worked on Tax Reform Under Reagan. The GOP Plan Is a Corporate Sellout twitter:description: "None of this helps the economy or the working people who rely on it" twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte6faffa17b819302/6988e429cf40a83efcc4a08c/ronald-reagan-donald-trump-2017-tax-reform-plan-republican-gop.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # We Worked on Tax Reform Under Reagan. The Republican Plan Is a Corporate Sellout > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=8a97fcf1-99cc-44dd-8495-ff5a8ee2e2c2&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=8a97fcf1-99cc-44dd-8495-ff5a8ee2e2c2&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=8a97fcf1-99cc-44dd-8495-ff5a8ee2e2c2&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. by [Lee Price](https://time.com/author/lee-price/) and [Steve Quick](https://time.com/author/steve-quick/) Nov 1, 2017 4:50 PM UTC  Ted Wright holds a foam campaign prop from 1980 of former U.S. President Ronald Reagan prior to the final campaign event of U.S. Republican Presidential candidate Donald Trump at Devos Place on November 7, 2016 in Grand Rapids, Michigan. Ted Wright holds a foam campaign prop from 1980 of former U.S. President Ronald Reagan prior to the final campaign event of U.S. Republican Presidential candidate Donald Trump at Devos Place on November 7, 2016 in Grand Rapids, Michigan.Jeff Kowalsky—AFP/Getty Images by [Lee Price](https://time.com/author/lee-price/) and [Steve Quick](https://time.com/author/steve-quick/) Nov 1, 2017 4:50 PM UTC President Donald Trump frequently points to [Ronald Reagan’s 1986 tax reform](http://time.com/4511870/john-f-kennedy-and-ronald-reagan-tax-policy/) as a model for his own tax plan, which would drastically cut taxes on the wealthiest Americans. “Under this pro-America system,” Trump said in an August [speech in Missouri](https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/08/30/remarks-president-trump-tax-reform-springfield-mo), “our economy boomed. It just went beautifully — right through the roof.” We were Senate staffers for Democrats back in 1986\. There’s a lot about the Reagan reform that today’s Republicans appear to be forgetting. Indeed, what’s being [proposed now](http://time.com/4998744/house-passes-gop-budget/) is far, far friendlier to the rich and big corporations — and more harmful for everyone else. Conservatives like to praise Reagan as an [anti-tax crusader](http://time.com/4354389/grover-norquist-donald-trump-fiscal-conservative/), but they never mention that in 1986 he pushed through major tax _increases_ on corporations and capital gains. True, Reagan gave most Americans a personal tax cut — but he proposed eliminating a key business loophole called the investment tax credit (ITC) and agreed to raise the capital gains rate to 28%. Because of that, the bill he signed in 1986 was essentially [revenue-neutral](https://www.jct.gov/publications.html?func=showdown&id=2355) — it actually raised taxes on corporations to cut them for individuals. In today’s dollars, corporate taxes went up by more than $50 billion a year. Also, that bill went through the regular congressional order, with bipartisan support in the Democratic-controlled House and in the Republican-controlled Senate. When [corporate lobbyists](http://time.com/3717941/national-governors-association/) almost killed it in the House, Reagan went to the Hill personally to persuade enough Republicans to support the bill. When it was about to die in the Senate, Republican Finance Committee Chairman Bob Packwood suspended markup for several weeks to work on a new package with a bipartisan group of committee members. The new package not only eliminated the ITC — it also closed loopholes used by passive investors and raised the capital gains rate. Contrary to Republican mythology today, real GDP _grew_ by 3.5% and 4.2% in 1987 and 1988, respectively — effectively gutting the argument that corporate tax cuts and low taxes on investors are essential for growth. (Indeed, it may even be the opposite: A recent [Institute for Policy Studies analysis](https://www.ips-dc.org/report-corporate-tax-cuts-boost-ceo-pay-not-jobs/) found that the 92 profitable public American corporations with effective tax rates below 20% from 2008 to 2015 actually _cut_ jobs over that period.) In contrast to 1986, today’s Republicans argue that cutting corporate taxes [is a magic elixir](http://time.com/4994072/thune-tax-reform-trump/) for the economy and are using budget procedures to avoid needing even a single Democratic vote. What accounts for the difference? One reason might be that the corporate executives backing the GOP saw their own personal interests in the tax debate differently back then. In 1986, executives got most of their pay through salaries, which showed up as ordinary income on their personal tax returns. So they cared deeply about the top personal income tax rate, which the Reagan reform slashed deeply. Thanks to that, they dropped their opposition to the tax hike on _corporations_. We saw firsthand that corporate lobbying against the bill evaporated with the prospect of top rates on personal income going down. But executive compensation has shifted dramatically since 1986\. Company stock and stock options soared from 24% of compensation in the 1980s to [60% in the 2000s](http://www.nber.org/papers/w16585.pdf). As a result, executives today are more fixated on their corporation’s stock price and their capital gains rate. Republicans also are planning a budget gimmick that rewards firms that park their profits overseas with a special “tax holiday” rate to encourage them to recognize those profits on their domestic books. This was done in 2004, and a study found [no benefit to U.S. jobs or research](https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970203633104576623771022129888). In fact, it encouraged them to book future profits overseas in hope of another lucrative “holiday.” All this comes at a price — literally. In 1986, the Republican White House and Senate leadership were committed to tax reform that didn’t raise the deficit. That discipline ensured that serious loophole-closing accompanied cuts in tax rates. A plan that increases the deficit by [$1.5 trillion over 10 years](http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-gop-budget-taxcuts-20171026-story.html), as the budget resolutions recently passed by the House and Senate would do, has no such discipline. Past [CBO](https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/ftpdocs/54xx/doc5485/2004-07.pdf) [research](https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/111th-congress-2009-2010/reports/09-28-economicoutlook%5Ftestimony.pdf) has found tax cuts that boost the deficit are as likely to reduce growth as to increase it. And they’ll almost certainly [put a squeeze](https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/10/26/16526458/2018-senate-budget-explained) on programs ordinary Americans depend on, like Medicaid and Social Security. None of this helps the economy or the working people who rely on it. Instead, it’s a boon for the executives and wealthy investors who back the GOP — a party they couldn’t have even imagined during the Reagan years. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5005163/2017-tax-reform-plan-republican-trump/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5005163/2017-tax-reform-plan-republican-trump/"},"headline":"We Worked on Tax Reform Under Reagan. The Republican Plan Is a Corporate Sellout","datePublished":"2017-11-01T16:50:32.000Z","dateModified":"2026-04-30T11:03:03.396Z","description":"Two Senate staffers who negotiated with Pres. Ronald Reagan on his tax plan say that the 2017 Republican bill harms working class Americans","url":"https://time.com/5005163/2017-tax-reform-plan-republican-trump/","keywords":["politics"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte6faffa17b819302/6988e429cf40a83efcc4a08c/ronald-reagan-donald-trump-2017-tax-reform-plan-republican-gop.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Lee Price","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/lee-price/"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Steve Quick","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/steve-quick/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte6faffa17b819302/6988e429cf40a83efcc4a08c/ronald-reagan-donald-trump-2017-tax-reform-plan-republican-gop.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Ronald Reagan, Donald Trump","caption":"A man holds a Ronald Reagan-Donald Trump sign","creditText":"Jeff Kowalsky—AFP/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/politics/","name":"politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5005163/2017-tax-reform-plan-republican-trump/","name":"We Worked on Tax Reform Under Reagan. The Republican Plan Is a Corporate Sellout"}}]}] ```