--- title: 40 of the Scariest Words in Donald Trump's U.N. Address description: Donald Trump spoke of ending the nuclear deal with Iran. But his Administration has offered no good alternative canonical: https://time.com/4948582/donald-trump-un-iran-speech-nuclear/ author: John Glaser article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2017-09-19T21:42:04.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-04-30T11:03:02.744Z article:section: Ideas og:title: These Are 40 of the Most Terrifying Words in Donald Trump's U.N. Address og:description: And they have nothing to do with North Korea og:url: https://time.com/4948582/donald-trump-un-iran-speech-nuclear/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9252142565ec2513/6988de5e86f68e65846e679d/gettyimages-849505398.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 3800 og:image:height: 2138 og:image:alt: UN-ASSEMBLY og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: These Are 40 of the Most Terrifying Words in Donald Trump's U.N. Address twitter:description: And they have nothing to do with North Korea twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9252142565ec2513/6988de5e86f68e65846e679d/gettyimages-849505398.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # These Are 40 of the Most Terrifying Words in Donald Trump's U.N. Address > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=8ac5e4e5-17ea-4f7c-9aab-95dfa9cca6c5&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=8ac5e4e5-17ea-4f7c-9aab-95dfa9cca6c5&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=8ac5e4e5-17ea-4f7c-9aab-95dfa9cca6c5&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=8ac5e4e5-17ea-4f7c-9aab-95dfa9cca6c5&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1) by [John Glaser](https://time.com/author/john-glaser/) and [Emma Ashford](https://time.com/author/emma-ashford/) Sep 19, 2017 9:42 PM UTC  US President Donald Trump addresses the 72nd Annual UN General Assembly in New York on September 19, 2017. US President Donald Trump addresses the 72nd Annual UN General Assembly in New York on September 19, 2017. Timothy A. Clary—AFP/Getty by [John Glaser](https://time.com/author/john-glaser/) and [Emma Ashford](https://time.com/author/emma-ashford/) Sep 19, 2017 9:42 PM UTC President [Donald Trump](http://time.com/4946276/donald-trump-united-nations-general-assembly/) is poised to make one of the most fateful decisions of his White House tenure. In his [speech to the United Nations](http://time.com/4947429/donald-trump-united-nations-reform) General Assembly, he lambasted the regime in Iran and, in a deeply misleading reference to the [Iran nuclear deal](http://time.com/4948234/president-trump-iran-nuclear-deal/) negotiated by his predecessor, he said this of the United States: _“We cannot abide by an agreement if it provides cover for the eventual construction of a nuclear program.”_ The President added: _“Frankly, that deal is an embarrassment to the United States, and I don’t think you’ve heard the last of it, believe me.”_ That threat is an apparent reference to Trump’s [stated intention](http://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/01/trump-wall-street-journal-interview-full-transcript-241214) to begin to deliberately unravel the nuclear deal next month. Yet his Administration has offered no good alternative, and every policy option outside the deal will push Iran towards the bomb. The President is choosing to risk a [dangerous and destabilizing confrontation. ](http://time.com/4665007/us-new-relationship-iran/) Following the signing of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which rolled back [Iran’s nuclear program](http://time.com/3957305/iran-nuclear-deal-obama/) in 2015 and placed stiff restrictions on it for the foreseeable future, Congress passed legislation requiring the president to certify Iranian compliance every 90 days. Iran is clearly abiding by the deal’s requirements, as President Trump himself has [twice formally acknowledged](https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/iran-adhering-to-nuclear-deal-with-world-powers-un-watchdog-says/2017/08/31/cb408e7d-bc9a-4874-bbdf-001f919a8c86%5Fstory.html). But the President appears determined to ignore [U.S. allies](http://www.europeanleadershipnetwork.org/eln-group-statement-sustaining-the-iran-nuclear-deal-%5F5108.html#.Wb%5FLGbLOfSs.twitter), [his own intelligence community](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/aug/28/iran-nuclear-deal-violations-white-house-search-intelligence) and [the International Atomic Energy Agency](https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/iaea-director-general-provides-updates-on-iran-north-korea-at-board-of-governors-meeting), which has affirmed eight separate times in detailed reports that Iran is in compliance with the deal. This desire to withdraw from the JCPOA is difficult to explain. Whatever his reasoning, this much is clear: All of America’s options outside the JCPOA carry unacceptably high risks and threaten to exacerbate the very behavior Iran hawks hope to forestall. The first obvious alternative is re-imposing harsh economic sanctions related to the nuclear program. But any renewal will only affect change with European support, which the United States is unlikely to receive if it unilaterally withdraws from a successful arms control agreement without cause. The trade-off — new sanctions in exchange for an unfettered Iranian nuclear program — is undoubtedly worse for U.S. security. Another option supported by some in Washington is a policy that challenges Iranian influence in the Middle East, through support for an anti-Iran coalition or direct military action against Iranian proxies in Iraq, Syria or Yemen. But more U.S. military involvement in these battles won’t substantially moderate Iranian behavior and risks bogging American forces down even further in endless regional conflicts. Some in the Trump Administration, including [Secretary of State Rex Tillerson](https://www.justsecurity.org/42531/tillersons-peaceful-regime-change-position-iran-really-and-next/) and [C.I.A. Director Mike Pompeo](http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/07/14/rep-mike-pompeo-one-year-later-obama-s-iran-nuclear-deal-puts-us-at-increased-risk.html), have advocated supporting Iranian opposition groups in order to foment internal unrest and generate “regime change from within.” In his U.N.G.A. speech, Trump reiterated this sentiment, framing his comments on Iran by pitting the people against the government. “Iran’s people are what their leaders fear the most,” he said. “Oppressive regimes cannot endure forever, and the day will come when \[Iran’s\] people will face a choice” to change the regime in Tehran. This is hopelessly unrealistic. First, no viable candidate exists for U.S. support. The exiled opposition group Mujahadeen-e-Khalq (MEK) is a favorite of U.S. hawks and Trump allies like former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich. But the MEK was designated a terrorist group by the State Department as recently as 2012, and they have zero support base inside Iran. Another oft-cited candidate for U.S. support is the so-called Green Movement that emerged amid the protests over the contested Iranian presidential elections in 2009\. But Green Movement leaders have never suggested they are interested in overthrowing the regime and, in any case, whatever popular support the movement continues to have would quickly evaporate with any whiff of U.S. backing. More to the point: America’s record of regime-change operations, whether overt or covert, is one of consistent failure and blowback. Recent history counsels we reject such policies. Perhaps the most extreme alternative to the JCPOA is military action, most likely in the form of targeted airstrikes on select Iranian nuclear facilities. Such a policy would harken back to the preventive war doctrine adopted by the Bush Administration in the run-up to the [U.S. invasion of Iraq](http://time.com/4758416/iraq-war-franco-pagetti/). Not only would this option violate international law, which requires either a legitimate self-defense rationale or U.N. Security Council approval for such a use of force, it could easily escalate to a regional conflagration that would cost more in blood and treasure than the Iraq and Afghanistan wars combined. In her recent speech at the American Enterprise Institute, [U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley](https://www.aei.org/publication/nikki-haley-address-on-iran-and-the-jcpoa/) argued that if President Trump chooses not to certify Iranian compliance, it would merely open a debate on Iran’s nuclear program and on the future of U.S.-Iranian relations. She neglected to mention the reality of that debate. If President Trump chooses not to certify Iranian compliance in mid-October, he will be kicking off a process likely to end U.S. participation in the nuclear deal, split us from our [European allies](http://time.com/4925919/john-mccain-italy-conference-speech/), weaken moderate reformers in Iran and set the United States down a far more dangerous and confrontational path. Trump inherited an Iran that forfeited 98% of its enriched uranium, dismantled two-thirds of its operating centrifuges and opened itself up to the most intrusive inspections regime ever voluntarily agreed to by any state. Undermining the JCPOA could undo all of that. Trump’s decision will shape the U.S.-Iran relationship for decades to come, and may ultimately mean the difference between war and peace. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4948582/donald-trump-un-iran-speech-nuclear/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4948582/donald-trump-un-iran-speech-nuclear/"},"headline":"These Are 40 of the Most Terrifying Words in Donald Trump's U.N. Address","datePublished":"2017-09-19T21:42:04.000Z","dateModified":"2026-04-30T11:03:02.744Z","description":"And they have nothing to do with North Korea","url":"https://time.com/4948582/donald-trump-un-iran-speech-nuclear/","keywords":["Donald Trump","politics","world affairs"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9252142565ec2513/6988de5e86f68e65846e679d/gettyimages-849505398.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"John Glaser","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/john-glaser/"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Emma Ashford","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/emma-ashford/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9252142565ec2513/6988de5e86f68e65846e679d/gettyimages-849505398.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"UN-ASSEMBLY","caption":"UN-ASSEMBLY","creditText":"Timothy A. Clary—AFP/Getty","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/donald-trump/","name":"Donald Trump"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4948582/donald-trump-un-iran-speech-nuclear/","name":"These Are 40 of the Most Terrifying Words in Donald Trump's U.N. Address"}}]}] ```