--- title: Russian Hacking on Election More Widespread Than Reported description: The hacking of state and local election databases in 2016 was more extensive than previously reported. canonical: https://time.com/4828306/russian-hacking-election-widespread-private-data/ author: Massimo Calabresi article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2017-06-22T15:24:29.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-23T16:16:27.187Z article:section: Politics og:title: Election Hackers Altered Voter Rolls, Stole Private Data: Officials og:description: Including at least one successful attempt to alter voter information. og:url: https://time.com/4828306/russian-hacking-election-widespread-private-data/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte97ae39b8aa0d884/6988cc83cf40a8e452c4797f/gettyimages-138711450.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2121 og:image:height: 1193 og:image:alt: Voters voting in polling place og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Election Hackers Altered Voter Rolls, Stole Private Data: Officials twitter:description: Including at least one successful attempt to alter voter information. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte97ae39b8aa0d884/6988cc83cf40a8e452c4797f/gettyimages-138711450.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Election Hackers Altered Voter Rolls, Stole Private Data, Officials Say > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME D.C. Brief: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition D.C. Brief is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington. D.C. Brief goes beyond the Washington headlines to explain the politics, personalities and power dynamics shaping what happens next. Senior correspondent Philip Elliott brings sharp context to the issues driving the capital, connecting the decisions made in Washington to the institutions, industries and people they affect. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=49237a17-e52e-404c-8a55-33473976f9cc&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Philip Elliott, Senior Correspondent | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership The policy influence ecosystem. A policy-focused audience spanning government, public affairs, advocacy, law, research, political media, and the institutions that make, interpret and respond to public policy. ### TIME D.C. Brief: key statements * D.C. Brief is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * D.C. Brief is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=49237a17-e52e-404c-8a55-33473976f9cc&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/subscribe?i=49237a17-e52e-404c-8a55-33473976f9cc&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is TIME's politics newsletter? D.C. Brief is TIME's Washington newsletter, written by senior correspondent Philip Elliott. It explains the politics, personalities and power dynamics behind the headlines, three times a week. #### Where can I get analysis of Washington politics by email? D.C. Brief is TIME's free Washington politics newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. It is written by a TIME senior correspondent who covers the capital full time. #### Who writes TIME's D.C. Brief? Philip Elliott, a senior correspondent at TIME, writes D.C. Brief. #### Is D.C. Brief free? Yes. D.C. Brief is free at time.com/newsletters.  by [Massimo Calabresi](https://time.com/author/massimo-calabresi/)  ## Massimo Calabresi Calabresi is TIME’s Washington bureau chief. Jun 22, 2017 3:24 PM UTC  Voters voting in polling place Voters voting in polling place Hill Street Studios—Getty Images/Blend Images  by [Massimo Calabresi](https://time.com/author/massimo-calabresi/)  ## Massimo Calabresi Calabresi is TIME’s Washington bureau chief. Jun 22, 2017 3:24 PM UTC The hacking of state and local election databases in 2016 was more extensive than previously reported, including at least one successful attempt to alter voter information, and the theft of thousands of voter records that contain private information like partial Social Security numbers, current and former officials tell TIME. In one case, investigators found there had been a manipulation of voter data in a county database but the alterations were discovered and rectified, two sources familiar with the matter tell TIME. Investigators have not identified whether the hackers in that case were Russian agents. The fact that private data was stolen from states is separately providing investigators a previously unreported line of inquiry in the probes into Russian attempts to influence the election. In Illinois, more than 90% of the nearly 90,000 records stolen by Russian state actors contained drivers license numbers, and a quarter contained the last four digits of voters’ Social Security numbers, according to Ken Menzel, the General Counsel of the [State Board of Elections](http://www.elections.il.gov). Congressional investigators are probing whether any of this stolen private information made its way to the Trump campaign, two sources familiar with the investigations tell TIME. “If any campaign, Trump or otherwise, used inappropriate data the questions are, How did they get it? From whom? And with what level of knowledge?” the former top Democratic staffer on the [House Intelligence Committee](https://intelligence.house.gov), Michael Bahar, tells TIME. “That is a crux of the investigation.” Spokesmen for the House and [Senate Intelligence](https://www.intelligence.senate.gov) committees declined to comment on the search for stolen data. No one contacted for this story said they had seen evidence that the stolen, private, data had actually made its way to the Trump campaign. The House Intelligence Committee plans to seek testimony this summer from Brad Parscale, the [digital director of the Trump campaign](http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/16/politics/russia-investigators-trump-digital-director/index.html), CNN reported last week. Hill investigators in February asked the White House and law enforcement agencies to [ensure that all materials](https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/senate-intelligence-committee-asks-for-russia-related-records-to-be-preserved/2017/02/21/4d0f889a-f877-11e6-bf01-d47f8cf9b643%5Fstory.html?utm%5Fterm=.2302f988e74d) relating to contacts between the Trump administration, transition team and campaign had with the Russians had been preserved. Parscale did not return messages requesting comment for this story. Trump’s press secretary, [Sean Spicer](http://time.com/4826069/sean-spicer-donald-trump-russian-interference-2016-election/), referred questions regarding the investigations to Trump’s legal team, which did not respond to requests for comment. Both intelligence committees are looking at whether and how the intrusions could have furthered Russia’s larger strategic goals of undermining U.S. democracy, hurting Hillary Clinton and helping Donald Trump. During the run up to the vote, Obama Administration cyber-security officials took steps to prepare for [widespread voter registration manipulation](http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/16/politics/russia-investigators-trump-digital-director/index.html), fearing Russia might seek to cause chaos at polling places to undermine the credibility of the election. Current and former law enforcement and intelligence officials say Russia could also have tried to use stolen voter data to gain leverage over witting or unwitting accomplices in the Trump camp, by involving them in a broader conspiracy. The House and Senate Intelligence committees held hearings on June 22 to highlight the ongoing vulnerability of the U.S. election systems. “I’m deeply concerned,” said North Carolina Republican Senator Richard Burr who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee, that “we could be here in two or four years talking about a much worse crisis.” Cyber-security officials testifying at the Senate hearing acknowledged for the first time the extent of the Russian effort to interfere with the election. Twenty-one states saw such intrusions last year, a senior official from the Department of Homeland Security, Jeanette Manfra, said. None of the intrusions affected the vote count itself, all the officials testified. That has not reassured some Hill leaders. “There’s no evidence they were able to affect the counting within the machines,” says the top Democrat on the House Intelligence committee, Congressman Adam Schiff of California. But, he added, “the effect on the election is quite a different matter.” The Russian efforts against state and local databases were so widespread that top Obama administration cyber-security officials assumed that by Election Day Moscow’s agents had probed all 50 states. “At first it was one state, then three, then five, then a dozen,” says Anthony Ferrante, a former FBI cybersecurity official and member of the White House team charged with preparedness and response to the cyber intrusion. At that point, says Michael Daniel, who led the White House effort to secure the vote against the Russian intrusions, “We had to assume that they actually tried to at least rattle the doorknobs on all 50, and we just happened to find them in a few of them.” Many hackers, including state-sponsored ones, use automated programs to target hundreds or even thousands of computers to check for vulnerabilities. But confirming intrusions is hard. As far as officials have been able to determine, the number of actual successful intrusions, where Russian agents gained sufficient access to attempt to alter, delete or download any information, was “less than a dozen,” current and former officials say. But that wasn’t the only worry. “In addition to the threat to the vote we were also very concerned about the public confidence in the integrity of the electoral system,” says Ferrante. Special Counsel Robert Mueller is investigating whether any laws were broken in relation to the Russian attack. The Congressional intelligence probes also seek to determine the nature and scope of the Russian espionage operation in order to protect future elections. “The integrity of the entire system is in question,” says Bahar, “So you need the system to push back and find out what happened and why, so it never happens again.” ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4828306/russian-hacking-election-widespread-private-data/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4828306/russian-hacking-election-widespread-private-data/"},"headline":"Election Hackers Altered Voter Rolls, Stole Private Data, Officials Say","datePublished":"2017-06-22T15:24:29.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-23T16:16:27.187Z","description":"A new line of inquiry into Russian attempts to interfere with the election","url":"https://time.com/4828306/russian-hacking-election-widespread-private-data/","keywords":["Voting","elections","2016 elections","Donald Trump"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte97ae39b8aa0d884/6988cc83cf40a8e452c4797f/gettyimages-138711450.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Massimo Calabresi","jobTitle":"Calabresi is TIME’s Washington bureau chief.","url":"https://time.com/author/massimo-calabresi/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte97ae39b8aa0d884/6988cc83cf40a8e452c4797f/gettyimages-138711450.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Voters voting in polling place","caption":"Voters voting in polling place","creditText":"Hill Street Studios—Getty Images/Blend Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/voting/","name":"Voting"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4828306/russian-hacking-election-widespread-private-data/","name":"Election Hackers Altered Voter Rolls, Stole Private Data, Officials Say"}}]}] ```