--- title: Russia Policy: Rand Paul Against Montenegro Joining NATO description: 'This is the crux of the debate: Congress abdicating its role in declaring war' canonical: https://time.com/4718958/montenegro-nato-rand-paul/ author: Rand Paul article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2017-03-31T00:41:07.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T08:06:11.162Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Sen. Rand Paul: Montenegro Joining NATO Is Against U.S. Interests og:description: 'This is the crux of the debate: Congress abdicating its role in declaring war' og:url: https://time.com/4718958/montenegro-nato-rand-paul/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production og:image:width: 1200 og:image:height: 675 og:image:alt: TIME og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Sen. Rand Paul: Montenegro Joining NATO Is Against U.S. Interests twitter:description: 'This is the crux of the debate: Congress abdicating its role in declaring war' twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production --- # Sen. Rand Paul: Montenegro Joining NATO Is Against U.S. Interests > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=2f6edfd0-d886-4277-bb2b-a1f7866c4fd2&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=2f6edfd0-d886-4277-bb2b-a1f7866c4fd2&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=2f6edfd0-d886-4277-bb2b-a1f7866c4fd2&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=2f6edfd0-d886-4277-bb2b-a1f7866c4fd2&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) ## Video: Donald Trump's Demands on NATO Defense Spending Are Driving a Wedge Into Europe [Watch (HLS stream): Donald Trump's Demands on NATO Defense Spending Are Driving a Wedge Into Europe](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/UhsI48Q9.m3u8) (0:53)  _Published 2017-02-20. U.S Vice President Mike Pence reminded the European leaders in the audience that, out of 28 members of the NATO military alliance, only four countries other than the U.S. currently meet their obligation to spend at least 2% of their GDP on defense._  by [Rand Paul](https://time.com/author/sen-rand-paul/)  ## Rand Paul Mar 31, 2017 12:41 AM UTC  by [Rand Paul](https://time.com/author/sen-rand-paul/)  ## Rand Paul Mar 31, 2017 12:41 AM UTC President Donald Trump said in his [inaugural address](http://time.com/donald-trump-annotated-inaugural-speech/): “We’ve defended other nation’s borders, while refusing to defend our own.” I couldn’t agree more. Today, the question is: Will we add yet another commitment to defend yet another foreign country? For decades, [NATO](http://time.com/4660803/nato-trump-meeting/) has been an organization where the U.S. disproportionately spends our blood and treasure. The other[ NATO countries](http://time.com/4680885/nato-defense-spending-budget-trump/) have largely hitched a ride to the U.S. train that subsidizes their defenses and allows them to direct their revenues to domestic pursuits. Adding a country with fewer than 2,000 soldiers to NATO is not in our self-interest. There is no national security interest that an alliance with [Montenegro](http://time.com/4672985/moscow-russia-us-politics/) will advance. If we invite Montenegro into NATO, it will be a one-way street with the U.S. committing to defend yet another country. Advocates of allowing Montenegro to join NATO admit as much. The Senate hearing on admitting Montenegro to NATO was really just a Russia-bashing session. Not one word was said of how allowing Montenegro into NATO would advance our national security. Even the citizens of Montenegro are divided on entry into NATO. [Fewer than 40% favor](http://www.gov.me/en/News/157178/Latest-opinion-poll-47-3-of-citizens-support-Montenegro-s-NATO-accession.html) joining NATO and approximately the same percentage of Montenegrins oppose joining NATO. Those who want to allow Montenegro into NATO believe that unless the whole world joins NATO, Russia will conquer the world. The truth is, as always, more complicated. During the [Cold War](http://time.com/4153592/panda-photos-chi-chi/), the myth of Russian might was endlessly circulated here at home and the effect was the production of endless munitions and ever-expanding debt. The Cold War ended and the Soviet Union failed, not because our military might overcame them but because their economic system was fundamentally flawed and our economic system outlasted them. Now, we are told we must fear the Russian Bear once again. But if you look closely you will see that Russian aggression around the world, particularly among the former Soviet satellites, is an attempt to mask a weak economy that runs the same risk of over-extension. Without question, Russia is an adversary, a country that ignores international norms and does not respect the territorial integrity of its neighbors. But Russia is weak because of corruption, oligarchy and human rights abuses. If Russia continues on this path, they may well encounter the same cataclysm that brought down the Soviet empire. This debate today is not just about Montenegro but about NATO expansion in general. The same cheerleaders for admitting Montenegro also recklessly pushed to admit Ukraine and Georgia; if they were still members, we could right now be at war with Russia. From the very beginning, our republic was founded with a deep suspicion of entangling alliances. Our founders wanted to do everything possible to avoid the chronic wars of Europe, where, for centuries, kings from one nation fought their brothers or cousins in other nations. The endless, meaningless wars of fratricide continued even into the 20th century. Washington wrote that “our true policy is to steer clear of permanent alliance with any portion of the foreign world.” Jefferson famously wrote, “peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none.” In modern times, such military heroes as President Eisenhower opposed intervention in Hungary, even when the naked aggression of the Soviets was appalling. Eisenhower likely had no real opportunity to militarily intervene before [200,000 Soviet troops with 4000 tanks](http://www.americanhungarianfederation.org/docs/Thomas%5FTorda%5F1956Revolution.pdf) rolled into Hungary. But at least part of the decision was a realpolitick decision that risking a nuclear confrontation with Russia did not justify war. Fast forward to today. For 16 years the US has been at war in the Middle East. Our justified response to the attacks of 9/11 has dragged on and on. The vote Congress made to authorize military force against the planners and attackers of the World Trade Centers is now used to justify all military action anywhere around the world. That vote is now used to justify war around the globe in dozens of countries. It is a lie and a disservice to our young men and women in uniform to have them fight under false pretenses. No active war involving the U.S. anywhere around the globe has been approved by Congress. Our unrestricted, un-voted upon involvement in war everywhere informs my opposition to expanding NATO. Everyone likes to talk of NATO’s Article 5 obligation to come to the defense of any NATO ally that is attacked. Many in Congress believe that Article 5 of the NATO alliance farms out the power to declare war to an international body. [David Fromkin](https://www.jstor.org/stable/20039476) put it this way: “If it is now agreed by treaty that an attack on a… NATO ally is deemed an attack on the United states, then it can be argued that the President is empowered without Congressional authorization to send us war.” This is the crux of the debate: Congress abdicating its role in declaring war. So, NATO. Should we expand it? Perhaps what we should do is make it clear that the NATO treaty is not a blind, open-ended promise to go to war anywhere and everywhere. I continue to believe and will advocate for always having an official vote in Congress before we declare war. ## Transcript [00:00] It is my privilege here at the NATO headquarters to [00:04] express the strong support of President Trump and [00:06] the United States of America for NATO and our [00:09] transatlantic alliance. The United States has been a [00:12] proud and faithful member of NATO since its founding [00:14] in 1949. This alliance plays a crucial role in promoting [00:18] peace and prosperity in the North Atlantic and frankly, [00:20] in the entire world. The United States commitment to [00:24] NATO is clear. The President of the United States and [00:27] the American people, expect our allies to keep their [00:30] word and to do more in our common defense. The [00:34] President really put this issue front and center. Before [00:37] the American people in his campaign for president, [00:41] and frankly it struck a very resonant chord. And so I [00:45] don't know what the answer is to or else, but I know [00:48] that the patience of the American people will not [00:51] endure forever. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4718958/montenegro-nato-rand-paul/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4718958/montenegro-nato-rand-paul/"},"headline":"Sen. Rand Paul: Montenegro Joining NATO Is Against U.S. Interests","datePublished":"2017-03-31T00:41:07.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T08:06:11.162Z","description":"'This is the crux of the debate: Congress abdicating its role in declaring war'","url":"https://time.com/4718958/montenegro-nato-rand-paul/","keywords":["NATO","russia","Rand Paul"],"thumbnailUrl":"","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Rand Paul","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/sen-rand-paul/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/tag/nato/","name":"NATO"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4718958/montenegro-nato-rand-paul/","name":"Sen. Rand Paul: Montenegro Joining NATO Is Against U.S. Interests"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Donald Trump's Demands on NATO Defense Spending Are Driving a Wedge Into Europe","description":"U.S Vice President Mike Pence reminded the European leaders in the audience that, out of 28 members of the NATO military alliance, only four countries other than the U.S. currently meet their obligation to spend at least 2% of their GDP on defense.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/UhsI48Q9/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2017-02-20T19:16:50.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/UhsI48Q9.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/4718958/montenegro-nato-rand-paul/","duration":"PT53S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/4718958/montenegro-nato-rand-paul/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```