It’s been 35 years since the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported the first cases of HIV/AIDS, as the disease is now known. Since then, prognosis for people infected with HIV has improved dramatically; no longer is an HIV diagnosis a death sentence, but some hurdles remain. Here are the 5 biggest changes in the epidemic.
HIV CASES VS. AIDS CASES
THEN
In the early days of the epidemic, most people progressed to AIDS, the advanced form of the disease, and then died of it.
NOW
Anti-HIV drugs have helped many people live with HIV for years, often even decades. At the epidemic’s peak in 1995, 50,000 died; in 2014, around 12,000 people died of late-stage AIDS.
WHO’S AT HIGHEST RISK
THEN
The epidemic began among marginalized populations, including gay men, IV drug users and sex workers.
NOW
While rates among gay men are still high and account for the bulk of new infections, about 25% of Americans living with HIV are women, and most new cases in women happen because they’ve become infected by their partners through sex. 44% of new HIV diagnoses in 2014 were in African-Americans, the racial group most affected by the disease. Transmission is also high among younger men who were born after the height of the epidemic in the 1980s and weren’t exposed to the early public health HIV prevention campaigns.
DRUG TREATMENTS
THEN
For years, AZT was the only drug approved to treat HIV. It was a stop gap, since HIV quickly became resistant to the treatment, but it was the only drug available.
NOW
Dozens of approved mediations exist, each of which blocks HIV from dividing and producing more virus in a different way. Combining the medications has transformed HIV infection into a chronic disease that can be managed with drug treatment.
PREVENTION EFFORTS
THEN
Safe sex campaigns and condom distribution were controversial public health messages, and conservative groups argued that such campaigns would promote promiscuous behavior. Abstinence became a popular message in some parts of the U.S.
NOW
Condoms and clean needles are proven ways to lower spread of the virus; studies consistently show that an abstinence-only approach doesn’t work to reduce spread of HIV.
HIV TESTING
THEN
Only available in labs or HIV clinics, people would have to risk the stigma of being seen at an HIV clinic in order to learn their status.
NOW
Home testing kits allow people to test in their own home; people send the required sample in provided packaging to a lab and can call in for their results. If needed, labs provide counselors to discuss the results.
More Must-Reads from TIME
- How Donald Trump Won
- The Best Inventions of 2024
- Why Sleep Is the Key to Living Longer
- How to Break 8 Toxic Communication Habits
- Nicola Coughlan Bet on Herself—And Won
- What It’s Like to Have Long COVID As a Kid
- 22 Essential Works of Indigenous Cinema
- Meet TIME's Newest Class of Next Generation Leaders
Contact us at letters@time.com