--- title: Hillary Clinton College: She Previously Criticized Idea description: Hillary Clinton has adopted elements of a Bernie Sanders–like free college plan that she previously criticized canonical: https://time.com/4396456/hillary-clinton-free-college-tuition-cost/ author: Haley Sweetland Edwards article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-07-08T02:23:25.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-19T07:48:20.532Z article:section: Politics og:title: The Toughest Critic of Clinton's College Plan? Herself og:description: She previously criticized the idea as unworkable and expensive og:url: https://time.com/4396456/hillary-clinton-free-college-tuition-cost/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4d7aafd45476692f/69889b17f887dc3a48e968de/hillary-clinton-college.jpg?branch=production&width=594&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 594 og:image:height: 334 og:image:alt: Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton speaks at a rally on the boardwalk on July 6, 2016 in Atlantic City, New Jersey. og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: The Toughest Critic of Clinton's College Plan? Herself twitter:description: She previously criticized the idea as unworkable and expensive twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4d7aafd45476692f/69889b17f887dc3a48e968de/hillary-clinton-college.jpg?branch=production&width=594&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # The Toughest Critic of Hillary Clinton's College Plan? Herself > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=941b4675-6955-4577-8560-0d10a9a61941&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=941b4675-6955-4577-8560-0d10a9a61941&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=941b4675-6955-4577-8560-0d10a9a61941&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=941b4675-6955-4577-8560-0d10a9a61941&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1)  by [Haley Sweetland Edwards](https://time.com/author/haley-sweetland-edwards/)  ## Haley Sweetland Edwards Jul 8, 2016 2:23 AM UTC  Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton speaks at a rally on the boardwalk on July 6, 2016 in Atlantic City, New Jersey. Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton speaks at a rally on the boardwalk on July 6, 2016 in Atlantic City, New Jersey. Jessica Kourkounis—Getty Images  by [Haley Sweetland Edwards](https://time.com/author/haley-sweetland-edwards/)  ## Haley Sweetland Edwards Jul 8, 2016 2:23 AM UTC When Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders first rolled out his plan offering [free college tuition](http://www.sanders.senate.gov/download/collegeforallsummary/?inline=file) to all American students, his political adversary, Hillary Clinton, threw some wonky shade. It would cost way too much, she told crowds at campaign rallies. And it’d be politically impossible since Republican governors, who would have to provide billions in matching state funds, would never get on board. “You read that fine print and it basically says, ‘Yeah, it’ll be free if the governors of America put in about $28 billion,’” Clinton said in a speech at SUNY Purchase in April, describing Sanders’ plan. The idea that Republican leaders, like Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, who recently cut $250 million in funding from the famous Wisconsin public university system, would suddenly chip in hundreds of millions to underwrite tuition “doesn’t make a whole lot of sense,” she added. “It doesn’t add up, my friends.“ But fast-forward to July and Clinton’s pragmatic accounting concerns appear to have vanished. On Wednesday, the presumptive Democratic nominee announced her support for a Sanders-esque plan to [eliminate tuition at all in-state public colleges and universities](http://time.com/4394699/hillary-clinton-free-college-bernie-sanders-tuition/) for any student whose family makes less than $125,000. While there are not yet precise estimates on how much Clinton’s new college tuition plan would cost, a Clinton aide told the Washington _Post_ that the new program would likely clock in at around [$100 billion more](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/grade-point/wp/2016/07/06/not-everyone-agrees-on-hillary-clintons-big-bold-plan-for-college-affordability/) than her previous, [New College Compact](https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/college/), putting it at around $450 billion over 10 years. Like Sanders’ plan, it hinges on the idea that state governors, incentivized by the promise of federal matching dollars, would provide billions in state funds to underwrite their long-neglected public colleges and universities. Clinton’s new proposal undoubtedly makes good politics — it allows Sanders, who has remained in the primary race, to [claim a public victory](http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-trailguide-updates-bernie-sanders-welcomes-hillary-1467817805-htmlstory.html), and may help to lure many of Sanders’ disillusioned, young supporters to the Clinton camp. But it suffers from precisely the same criticisms that Clinton herself levied against Sanders’ plan a few months ago: it is dauntingly expensive and nearly impossible to implement from a political standpoint. Clinton’s plan, which would make college free for roughly 80% of students, stops short of Sanders’ pledge to eliminate tuition for all American students, regardless of income. But it goes way beyond her previous proposal, which would have provided more subsidies for lower-income students, paid for by limiting tax deductions and expenditures for the wealthy to 28%, and required that families make a “realistic contribution” to tuition. In her announcement, Clinton said she would pay for her new plan by closing high-income tax loopholes, particularly those used by hedge funds, private-equity firms and other Wall Street money managers, and then use that money to provide grants to states that agreed to invest matching funds in their own state public schools. Education experts, including Barmak Nassirian, the director of federal relations and policy analysis at the American Association of State Colleges and Universities, says the Clinton team is probably “gross underestimating” the real cost of implementing her plan as-is. Considering that public colleges currently bring in roughly $65 billion per year in tuition revenue, Nassirian said, the simple arithmetic would suggest the outlay would run closer $650 billion over 10 years. Even if you exclude as many as 20% of students whose families make more than $125,000 a year, who will still pay tuition under Clinton’s plan, the government would assume 80% of that cost. That’s closer to $520 billion, not $450 billion. “It wouldn’t just be expensive financially,” Nassirian added, “but expensive in terms of the political capital that would have to be spent pursuing policies that are not necessarily optimal.” While Nassirian applauds the idea of incentivizing state governments to reinvest in public colleges and universities, the Clinton plan includes several other policy proposals that would end up being very expensive for very little reward, he says. For example, the plan would allow students to permanently refinance their loans under today’s [superlow interest rates](https://studentaid.ed.gov/sa/types/loans/interest-rates#rates) — 3.76% for undergraduates — which would result in the government receiving tens of billions of dollars less in repayments over the years. It would also impose a three-month moratorium on loan payments to allow students to enroll in a more appropriate repayment plan, and expand the Pell grant program to allow low-income students to take classes in the summer. Neal McCluskey, the director of Cato’s Center for Educational Freedom, said the problem was not only the program’s high sticker price, but that it may end up being regressive. “If you were to make tuition go away for people making up to $125,000, that’s regressive,” he said. “It’s helping wealthier people more, who don’t necessarily need it, and it’s hurting taxpayers.” McCluskey and other critics also make the same argument that Clinton once did — that students benefit from working for their tuition dollars, since it tends to help them value the education they’re receiving. In speeches last year, Clinton suggested that students should contribute their earnings from working 10 hours a week to their tuition payments. “We need to make a quality education affordable and available to everyone [willing to work for it](https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/college/),” she said last August, “without saddling them with decades of debt.” The toughest criticism that Clinton’s new college plan is going to face will be words like that, from herself just a few months ago. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4396456/hillary-clinton-free-college-tuition-cost/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4396456/hillary-clinton-free-college-tuition-cost/"},"headline":"The Toughest Critic of Hillary Clinton's College Plan? Herself","datePublished":"2016-07-08T02:23:25.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-19T07:48:20.532Z","description":"Hillary Clinton has adopted elements of a Bernie Sanders–like free college plan that she previously criticized","url":"https://time.com/4396456/hillary-clinton-free-college-tuition-cost/","keywords":["Hillary Clinton","2016 Election","Education","College","Bernie Sanders"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4d7aafd45476692f/69889b17f887dc3a48e968de/hillary-clinton-college.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Haley Sweetland Edwards","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/haley-sweetland-edwards/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4d7aafd45476692f/69889b17f887dc3a48e968de/hillary-clinton-college.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton speaks at a rally on the boardwalk on July 6, 2016 in Atlantic City, New Jersey.","caption":"Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton speaks at a rally on the boardwalk on July 6, 2016 in Atlantic City, New Jersey.","creditText":"Jessica Kourkounis—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4396456/hillary-clinton-free-college-tuition-cost/","name":"The Toughest Critic of Hillary Clinton's College Plan? Herself"}}]}] ```