--- title: Migrant Crisis: The Case for Open Borders description: A better option than exclusion would be to restrict migrants’ eligibility for benefits canonical: https://time.com/4062074/migrants-open-borders/ author: Bryan Caplan article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2015-10-07T13:41:18.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:57:34.967Z article:section: Ideas og:title: The Case for Open Borders og:description: A better option than exclusion would be to restrict migrants’ eligibility for benefits og:url: https://time.com/4062074/migrants-open-borders/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltb53e31591d103b9b/6988651fab6d77ef786a6537/koy201509010009_final.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1600 og:image:height: 900 og:image:alt: Migrant crisis og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: The Case for Open Borders twitter:description: A better option than exclusion would be to restrict migrants’ eligibility for benefits twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltb53e31591d103b9b/6988651fab6d77ef786a6537/koy201509010009_final.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # The Case for Open Borders > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=b88e630f-6b96-4a05-a8a1-949ef5f73590&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=b88e630f-6b96-4a05-a8a1-949ef5f73590&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=b88e630f-6b96-4a05-a8a1-949ef5f73590&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. ## Video: A Desperate Crossing [Watch (HLS stream): A Desperate Crossing](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/Chck0kIJ.m3u8) (3:24)  _Published 2015-09-09. TIME gets exclusive access to the Greek coast guard as they search for, and rescue migrants_ by [Bryan Caplan](https://time.com/author/4062075/) ## Bryan Caplan Oct 7, 2015 1:41 PM UTC  A group of migrants waits at a makeshift detention camp for Hungarian authorities to register their arrival in the European Union. Roszke, Hungary, Aug. 29, 2015. A group of migrants waits at a makeshift detention camp for Hungarian authorities to register their arrival in the European Union. Roszke, Hungary, Aug. 29, 2015.Yuri Kozyrev—NOOR for TIME by [Bryan Caplan](https://time.com/author/4062075/) ## Bryan Caplan Oct 7, 2015 1:41 PM UTC Politicians on both sides of the Atlantic are once again searching for better ways to curtail immigration. In America, Republican candidates are pondering bigger, better border walls. In Europe, leading politicians are hoping someone figures out a way to end the Syrian refugee crisis by bringing peace to the Middle East. In the midst of these passionate debates about _how_ to curtail immigration, almost no one is talking about _whether_ immigration should be curtailed in the first place. This is the debate we should be having. Some of the greatest victories of social justice in 20th-century America have, in the end, cost us less than nothing. The end of Jim Crow laws, which restricted blacks’ right to work for any willing employer, didn’t only help blacks; it also enriched our whole society by allowing black workers to fully use their talents. The entry of American women into traditionally male jobs, similarly, was not a victory for women alone; wasting half the country’s skill, determination and ingenuity would have been a tragic loss for the U.S. These successes should make us wonder if we’re overlooking other ways to make our society juster and richer at the same time. As it turns out, such an opportunity is hiding in plain sight: Instead of redoubling our efforts to curtail immigration, we should return to the historic American policy of [open borders](http://openborders.info/)—admitting everyone eager to come build a better life for themselves. Most countries welcome tourists, yet developed countries place heavy restrictions on foreigners who want to settle down, find a job, and make a new life. This would be weird if we didn’t take it for granted. Immigrants, like tourists, are normally paying customers, not beggars. Like our ancestors, today’s immigrants come to swap their labor for our products. Most move because their productivity—and hence their pay—is higher here than it is at home. If you lived in Syria or Haiti, you wouldn’t be very productive either. How would open borders benefit those of us who are already here? You could just as well ask, “How would equal rights for blacks benefit whites?” or “How would equal rights for women benefit men?” The answer, in all three cases, is the same: A mind – white or black, male or female, native or foreign – is a terrible thing to waste. Despite the bipartisan popularity of immigration restrictions, these laws trap most of mankind’s skill, determination, and ingenuity in countries that cripple these precious assets. The losses boggle the imagination. According to economists’ standard estimates, letting anyone take a job anywhere would roughly [_double_ global production](http://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/jep.25.3.83) – a bigger gain than any other economic reform known to man. This isn’t trickle-down economics; it’s Niagara Falls economics. Immigrants are rarely charity cases. On some level, even immigration’s harshest critics know that immigrants come to work. That’s why critics favor strict enforcement of the many draconian laws that bar foreigners from the labor market. Syrian refugees will take some time to get on their feet, but they, too, will eventually find jobs as long as their host countries permit them to work. Countries with lavish welfare states have more to worry about, but there is a cheap, humane alternative to exclusion: restrict migrants’ eligibility for benefits. Creative approaches abound: For example, immigrants could be ineligible for government transfers for their first 10 years of residence, or until they’ve paid $100,000 in taxes. Critics of immigration argue it has negative effects on wages, budgets, culture, crime, politics, and other areas. Yet serious researchers usually conclude that anti-immigration pundits and politicians are [making](http://211.253.40.86/mille/service/ers/30000/IMG/000000021943/w16736.pdf) [mountains](http://www.amazon.com/From-Immigrants-Americans-Rise-Fitting/dp/1442201363) [out](http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/nbrnberwo/13229.htm) [of](http://econfaculty.gmu.edu/bcaplan/caplannaik.pdf) [molehills](http://econfaculty.gmu.edu/bcaplan/pdfs/whyimmigration.pdf). In any case, the economic gains of open borders are so vast that they dwarf critics’ most outlandish complaints. We are talking about _trillions_ of dollars of extra wealth creation, year after year. Nor must we fatalistically take the good with the bad. The U.S. could impose surtaxes on immigrants’ earnings, then use the proceeds to cut taxes for low-skilled natives. It could require English fluency as a condition of entry. It could limit full citizenship—and the vote—to immigrants with a masterful understanding of American government. If such limits seem unfair, they are far less unfair than the status quo, which traps countless foreigners in poverty and danger because they proverbially “chose the wrong parents.” If we can acknowledge foreigners’ basic rights to work for willing employers and rent from willing landlords—and dramatically enrich foreigners and natives in the process—why not do it? ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4062074/migrants-open-borders/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4062074/migrants-open-borders/"},"headline":"The Case for Open Borders","datePublished":"2015-10-07T13:41:18.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:57:34.967Z","description":"A better option than exclusion would be to restrict migrants’ eligibility for benefits","url":"https://time.com/4062074/migrants-open-borders/","keywords":["world affairs","Syria","Question Everything"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltb53e31591d103b9b/6988651fab6d77ef786a6537/koy201509010009_final.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Bryan Caplan","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/4062075/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltb53e31591d103b9b/6988651fab6d77ef786a6537/koy201509010009_final.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Migrant crisis","caption":"Migrant crisis","creditText":"Yuri Kozyrev—NOOR for TIME","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/world-affairs/","name":"world affairs"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4062074/migrants-open-borders/","name":"The Case for Open Borders"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"A Desperate Crossing","description":"TIME gets exclusive access to the Greek coast guard as they search for, and rescue migrants","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/Chck0kIJ/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2015-09-09T22:47:25.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/Chck0kIJ.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/4062074/migrants-open-borders/","duration":"PT3M24S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/4062074/migrants-open-borders/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```