--- title: Air Force's $25 Billion Bomber Blunder description: The Air Force initially said a new set of nuclear bombers would cost $33.1 billion, but that number has fluctuated wildly canonical: https://time.com/4010526/the-air-forces-25-billion-bomber-blunder/ author: Mark Thompson article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2015-08-25T22:10:15.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:46:20.069Z article:section: Politics og:title: The Air Force's $25 Billion Bomber Blunder og:description: The Air Force's price tag for a new nuclear bomber has fluctuated wildly og:url: https://time.com/4010526/the-air-forces-25-billion-bomber-blunder/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt8e3a29b5b682b635/698860d60b72e3436b6e5872/long-range-strike-bomber-northrop-1.jpg?branch=production&width=640&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 640 og:image:height: 360 og:image:alt: long-range-strike-bomber-northrop-1 og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: The Air Force's $25 Billion Bomber Blunder twitter:description: The Air Force's price tag for a new nuclear bomber has fluctuated wildly twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt8e3a29b5b682b635/698860d60b72e3436b6e5872/long-range-strike-bomber-northrop-1.jpg?branch=production&width=640&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # The Air Force's $25 Billion Bomber Blunder > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=657b7e18-b4a9-4039-9630-3d3dd943f48d&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=657b7e18-b4a9-4039-9630-3d3dd943f48d&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=657b7e18-b4a9-4039-9630-3d3dd943f48d&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=657b7e18-b4a9-4039-9630-3d3dd943f48d&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) ## Video: A History of Spacewalks: First Spacewalk, March 18, 1965 [Watch (HLS stream): A History of Spacewalks: First Spacewalk, March 18, 1965](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/rmb3S64A.m3u8) (0:27)  _Published 2015-06-01. The Russian cosmonaut Alexey Leonov was one of the twenty air force pilots selected to be part of the first cosmonaut group in 1960._ by [Mark Thompson](https://time.com/author/mark-thompson/) ## Mark Thompson Aug 25, 2015 10:10 PM UTC  An artist's rendering of what the Long Range Strike Bomber might look like. An artist's rendering of what the Long Range Strike Bomber might look like. Northrop Grumman by [Mark Thompson](https://time.com/author/mark-thompson/) ## Mark Thompson Aug 25, 2015 10:10 PM UTC No one knows what the Air Force’s [top-secret](http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/air-space/strike/2015/01/18/air-force-bomber-industry/21805275/) new bomber will look like. Butthe service keeps saying it knows how much it’s going to cost. That’s what makes the Air Force’s $25 billion price tag error so disconcerting. The problem began last year, when the service told Congress the yet-to-be-built Long-Range Strike Bomberwould cost $33.1 billion between 2015 and 2025\. It recently [updated](http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-08-17/air-force-botches-bomber-s-10-year-costs-in-reports-to-congress) the estimate (from 2016 to 2026) to $58.4 billion—a hike of $25.3 billion, or 76%. That works out to a swing of $169 for each of the roughly 150 million Americans who file federal tax returns. But, the Air Force acknowledged last week**,** the latest cost estimate to develop and buy the aircraft over the coming decade is pegged at $41.7 billion. Apparently, the fledgling stealth bomber can elude fiscal reckoning as well as enemy radar. The pair of multi-billion-dollar snafus—$9 billion too low last year, $17 billion too high this year—is head-spinning. It leads to a simple question: is anyone minding the store? Calculating the cost and timetable of new weapons is always difficult. Military hardware is constantly pushing the boundaries of what is possible (the new bomber, for example, will be “a long-range, air-refuelable, highly survivable aircraft with significant nuclear and conventional stand-off and direct-attack weapons payload,” according to the Air Force). The military hierarchy has strong institutional incentives to lowball costs and tighten schedules despite the state-of-the-art systems under development that challenge both. Lower costs and quicker production make it more likely that a weapon will be bought. That helps explain why a weapon’s final cost, at the end of a production run, usually bear little resemblance to initial projections (and the inevitable delays drive up costs, which reduce the numbers of aircraft, tanks or ships to be bought, which drives up costs, and so on). But none of that explains why the Air Force flubbed its numbers for the new bomber. Sure, early cost projections (drafted by an alliance of a military service that wants to buy what’s being built, and by contractors who want to sell it), are squishy. But the Long-Range Strike Bomber was supposed to be different. Ever since 2011, the Pentagon has been [saying](http://time.com/3691337/pentagon-budget/) the new warplane will cost $550 million a jet (although that estimate uses 2010 dollars, requires buying up to 100 of the new planes, and doesn’t include an estimated $20 billion more in research and development efforts that will be required to build it). In other words, it will cost a lot more than $550 million apiece, and taxpayers will [invariably](http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/air-space/strike/2015/03/05/lrsb-bomber-cost-plus-contract-air-force/24432697/) foot the higher bill. The Long-Range Strike Bomber (it’ll eventually get a nifty name, like the B-3 _Stealthstratofortress_ soon enough) isn’t a run-of-the-mill program. After all, it’s one of the service’s top programs, something the Air Force says is a vital replacement for the aging B-52 and B-2 bomber leg of the nuclear triad, which also includes land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles and submarine-launched missiles. A team of Boeing and Lockheed Martin is competing against Northrop Grumman to build it. The service [announced](http://www.af.mil/News/ArticleDisplay/tabid/223/Article/486167/af-moves-forward-with-future-bomber.aspx) last June it expected to select a contractor by this past spring, but that announcement has slipped until fall. Rebuilding the nation’s nuclear triad is serious business. The cost estimates, contained in annual reports to Congress on how much the nation is modernizing its atomic forces, should have been double-checked, coordinated, scrubbed and double-checked again to ensure their accuracy. While they’re only estimates—and need to mesh only with other estimates—their integrity is key to building support for a program that some believe isn’t worth the cost. So what happened? “It occurred in part because of human error,” Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James said Monday. “And in part because of process error, meaning a couple of our people got the figures wrong and the process of coordination was not fully carried out in this case.” Those who erred have been “counseled,” James said. “The key thing is there has been no change in those cost figures.” In other words, that recent $41.7 billion estimate is rock solid, at least for now. As they say of the nuclear weapons the new bomber is being designed to carry: close enough. ## Transcript [ MUSIC ]. [ MUSIC ] ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4010526/the-air-forces-25-billion-bomber-blunder/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4010526/the-air-forces-25-billion-bomber-blunder/"},"headline":"The Air Force's $25 Billion Bomber Blunder","datePublished":"2015-08-25T22:10:15.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:46:20.069Z","description":"Are these the same people picking targets?","url":"https://time.com/4010526/the-air-forces-25-billion-bomber-blunder/","keywords":["Military","Tech","Congress","Weapons"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt8e3a29b5b682b635/698860d60b72e3436b6e5872/long-range-strike-bomber-northrop-1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Mark Thompson","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/mark-thompson/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt8e3a29b5b682b635/698860d60b72e3436b6e5872/long-range-strike-bomber-northrop-1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"long-range-strike-bomber-northrop-1","caption":"An artist's rendering of what the Long Range Strike Bomber might look like.","creditText":"Northrop Grumman","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/military/","name":"Military"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4010526/the-air-forces-25-billion-bomber-blunder/","name":"The Air Force's $25 Billion Bomber Blunder"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"A History of Spacewalks: First Spacewalk, March 18, 1965","description":"The Russian cosmonaut Alexey Leonov was one of the twenty air force pilots selected to be part of the first cosmonaut group in 1960.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/rmb3S64A/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2015-06-01T22:16:58.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/rmb3S64A.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/4010526/the-air-forces-25-billion-bomber-blunder/","duration":"PT27S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/4010526/the-air-forces-25-billion-bomber-blunder/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```