mobile-bannertablet-bannerdesktop-banner
Getty Images

The Best Partner for the Next President: Research Universities

Ideas
Drew Gilpin Faust is the 28th president of Harvard University and Janet Napolitano is the 20th president of the University of California system.

As we once again enter a presidential campaign cycle, candidates will face critical questions about our nation’s future: How will American competitiveness fare in a volatile, global economy? Can we broaden access to knowledge and learning that will close inequality gaps? Will we offer future generations of researchers a path here in the U.S.? Are we equipped to tackle urgent issues such as failing health systems, terrorism, and climate change?

Answers to these questions will shape the lives and livelihoods of people across the country, and they will come, in part, from top research universities. As leaders of two such institutions, one public and the other private, we see every day the powerful outcomes of the search for new knowledge.

Discovery is at the heart of what universities do. We bring together scholars and students who are eager to understand more about the world in which we live. They are curious and committed to asking difficult questions and to solving problems that seem insurmountable. The research undertaken today at universities, and tomorrow by the students we educate, can improve human lives in ways we cannot predict—or even imagine.

Presidential candidates serious about leading this nation must have a concrete, far-reaching plan for keeping our research universities strong and preeminent. They should understand the importance of basic research, which becomes the foundation of innovation, and they should embrace the importance of educating America’s next generation of creators.

We are calling for the renewal of an American compact: a partnership between government and our nation’s universities designed to strengthen our economy, increase access to knowledge, enhance individual prosperity, and address the great challenges of our time.

For over half a century, the collaboration between universities and the federal government has been an engine of scientific discovery and extraordinary progress. It has resulted in medications and treatments for cancer, diabetes, influenza, and HIV; military equipment such as night vision goggles, lightweight body armor, and MREs; and the technology behind tablet computers, search algorithms, GPS, and long-lasting batteries. Yet that partnership is threatened by the erosion of federal support. The question for presidential candidates must be, therefore, not whether the government can afford to invest in research, but can it afford not to?

Unfortunately, the trend of federal investment has been in the wrong direction, and we risk losing ground to those nations eager to stimulate their economies and replicate the historic impact of such funding. The pace of American investment in research and development as a percentage of GDP has slowed, placing us 10th behind OECD nations such as Germany and Japan. China, meanwhile, is projected to outspend the U.S. within the next decade. East Asia as a whole already does.

The nation and the world need the kind of discovery and imagination that U.S. universities nurture. We need the knowledge and understanding that research generates—knowledge about energy and the environment, urban design, cancer immunotherapy, the inner workings of the human brain, and all of the other ambitious projects our faculty pursue. We need the economic vitality—the jobs and companies, creativity and culture—that comes from these ideas and discoveries.

We need a field of presidential candidates determined not to risk the excellence of our intellectual capital. Universities represent an investment in the ideas and the people that will build our future, and collaboration with the federal government is essential to our collective success. Candidates who choose to renew and reinvigorate this longstanding partnership will be positioning the nation for a stronger, more vibrant future.

Drew Gilpin Faust is the 28th president of Harvard University and the Lincoln Professor of History in Harvard's Faculty of Arts and Sciences; Janet Napolitano is the 20th president of the University of California system of 10 campuses, five medical centers and three affiliated national laboratories.

See the 2016 Candidates Looking Very Presidential

Values Voters Summit
Sen. Ted Cruz is surrounded by stars and stripes at the 2014 Values Voter Summit in Washington, D.C. on September 26, 2014.Mark Peterson—Redux
Values Voters Summit
USA - Hillary Clinton speaks at Iowa Senator Tom Harken'a annual Steak Fry
Jeb Bush
Sen. Bernie Sanders Launches Presidential Bid In Vermont
Political Theatre
Former Hewlett-Packard Co Chief Executive Officer Carly Fiorina listens to her introduction from the side of the stage at the Freedom Summit in Des Moines, Iowa on Jan. 24, 2015.
Georgia Senate Candidate David Perdue Campaigns With Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY)
Rick Perry
Bobby Jindal
Martin O'Malley
Marco Rubio
Ben Carson
Barack Obama, Jim Webb
John Kasich, Election
Conservative Political Action Conference
Scott Walker
Mike Huckabee
Former Rhode Island Governor Chafee poses for a selfie with a student after announcing he will seek the Democratic nomination to be U.S. president during an address to the GMU School of Policy, Government, and International Affairs in Arlington
FILE: Lindsey Graham To Run For President
Former New York governor George Pataki listens to a question at the First in the Nation Republican Leadership Conference in Nashua, New Hampshire, in this April 17, 2015 file photo. Pataki on May 28, 2015 entered the race for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination, joining a crowded field of candidates vying to retake the White House for their party. REUTERS/Brian Snyder/Files
Sen. Ted Cruz is surrounded by stars and stripes at the 2014 Values Voter Summit in Washington, D.C. on September 26, 20
... VIEW MORE

Mark Peterson—Redux
1 of 20

Ideas
TIME Ideas hosts the world's leading voices, providing commentary on events in news, society, and culture. We welcome outside contributions. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of TIME editors.
All products and services featured are based solely on editorial selection. TIME may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.