--- title: Why Joni Ernst Isn’t “Iowa’s Sarah Palin” description: Trying to turn her into a caricature, Democrats paint Ernst as “crazy” canonical: https://time.com/3132793/why-joni-ernst-isnt-iowas-sarah-palin/ author: Jay Newton-Small article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2014-08-18T01:48:21.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-21T09:42:50.335Z article:section: Politics og:title: Why Joni Ernst Isn’t “Iowa’s Sarah Palin” og:description: How politics makes caricatures of strong women og:url: https://time.com/3132793/why-joni-ernst-isnt-iowas-sarah-palin/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt8cd4fddf5eda725c/69869fd613c79f82671937f9/453373038.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 4785 og:image:height: 2692 og:image:alt: Iowa Politics og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Why Joni Ernst Isn’t “Iowa’s Sarah Palin” twitter:description: How politics makes caricatures of strong women twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt8cd4fddf5eda725c/69869fd613c79f82671937f9/453373038.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Why Joni Ernst Isn’t 'Iowa’s Sarah Palin' > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=fcdce8ea-9246-4447-8436-ff6a7ad2a4eb&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=fcdce8ea-9246-4447-8436-ff6a7ad2a4eb&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=fcdce8ea-9246-4447-8436-ff6a7ad2a4eb&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement.  by [Jay Newton-Small](https://time.com/author/jay-newton-small/)  ## Jay Newton-Small Aug 18, 2014 1:48 AM UTC  Joni Ernst, Iowa Republican Senate candidate, campaigns at the 2014 Iowa State Fair in Des Moines, Iowa, August 8, 2014. Joni Ernst, Iowa Republican Senate candidate, campaigns at the 2014 Iowa State Fair in Des Moines, Iowa, August 8, 2014. Tom Williams—CQ Roll Call/Getty Images  by [Jay Newton-Small](https://time.com/author/jay-newton-small/)  ## Jay Newton-Small Aug 18, 2014 1:48 AM UTC **Updated 8/18/14 at 1:08pm** _Des Moines, Iowa_ Standing before a crowd at the Iowa State Fair, perspiring slightly in sun that had finally emerged after two days of rain, Democratic National Committee Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz told the crowd what she really thought about Republican Iowa Senate hopeful Joni Ernst. “She’s like an onion of crazy; the more you peel back the layers, the more disturbing it is,” Wasserman Shultz said, followed by a cheer of audience approval. The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee went up with a television ad on Monday entitled, “Joni Ernst & Sarah Palin¹s Tea Party Agenda Is Too Extreme For Iowa.”Joni Ernst is the only Republican Senate nominee in the country who chose to campaign with Sarah Palin because no one is more in line with Palin’s Tea Party ideas that are bad for Iowa families,” said Christina Freundlich, communications director of the Iowa Democratic Party. This is the conventional wisdom Democrats have been pushing in this too-close-to-call race between State Sen. Ernst and Rep. Bruce Braley, the Democratic candidate to replace retiring Sen. Tom Harkin, also a Democrat: Ernst is an extreme, Tea Party nut job, the female version of Ted Cruz. The problem with this line of rhetoric is: it’s not true. Ernst broke out in the primary, despite being enormously outspent by retired businessman Mark Jacobs, with a pair of innovative commercials. [In one](http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/05/05/1296981/-IA-Sen-Joni-Ernst-R-Pulls-A-Gun-Pledges-To-Unload-On-Obamacare-In-Ad#), she aims a gun at the camera while a narrator says, “Once she sets her sights on Obamacare, Joni’s gonna unload.” Then she fires. [In another](http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-joni-ernsts-ad-about-castrating-hogs-transformed-iowas-us-senate-race/2014/05/11/c02d1804-d85b-11e3-95d3-3bcd77cd4e11%5Fstory.html), she talks about growing up on a farm castrating pigs, and how she knows how to “cut pork.” Both drew national attention for their boldness—some calling them Palinesque— and in that respect, they worked. With relatively little money or name recognition, Ernst won the GOP primary with 56% of the vote. All primary candidates say things they [inevitably regret](http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2014/08/15/morning-plum-how-far-right-is-joni-ernst/) in the General Election and Ernst is no exception. Since the General Election has begun, videos of Ernst talking about [Agenda 21](http://news.yahoo.com/will-joni-ernst-s-flirtations-with-the-political-fringe-haunt-her-in-november-223054974.html?soc%5Fsrc=mediacontentstory), a Glenn Beck [conspiracy theory](http://news.yahoo.com/will-joni-ernst-s-flirtations-with-the-political-fringe-haunt-her-in-november-223054974.html?soc%5Fsrc=mediacontentstory) about the United Nations’ superseding U.S. laws, states [nullifying](http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/07/28/exclusive-gop-senate-candidate-caught-saying-states-can-nullify-laws.html) federal laws and [impeaching Obama](http://news.yahoo.com/joni-ernst---impeachment--of-obama-should-be-on-the-table-204439051.html) have surfaced. Ernst has since [backpedaled](http://news.yahoo.com/joni-ernst-seeks-to-walk-back-talk-of-impeaching-obama-015747572.html) from all of these statements, saying the impeachment talk, in particular, was taken out of context, arguing that she was answering a hypothetical question. To be sure, Ernst is more conservative than most Republicans in the Senate. She believes life begins at conception, and co-sponsored a personhood amendment in the Iowa State Senate. Personhood laws often ban several types of contraception, as well as Plan B, on the grounds that conception could have taken place already. Ernst, who served more than 20 years in the military, including a deployment to Iraq, is also enthusiastically pro-gun. And if elected, she would make it one of her top priorities to repeal Obamacare. She also enjoys the support of those she has been lobbed together with: Cruz and Palin. That said, Ernst’s other endorsements include Mitt Romney, whom she endorsed in the 2008 and 2012 Iowa caucuses, and Florida Sen. Marco Rubio. She’s also the only 2014 primary candidate to be backed by both the Chamber of Commerce and the Senate Conservatives Fund, which has funded Tea Partiers looking to usurp establishment candidates. When asked which Senator she’d be most like, Ernst tells TIME she thinks she’d be like Nebraska Sen. Deb Fischer. Fischer was elected as a little-known Tea Partier, and was also [endorsed by Palin](http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/05/17/sarah-palin-s-latest-triumph-deb-fischer-wins-nebraska-gop-primary.html) and accused of being the “Sarah Palin of Nebraska” by some Democrats at first, but has since proven to be a relatively quiet, self-described compromiser in the Senate. “We both come from Plains states and we have a lot in common both stylistically, and ideologically, speaking,” Ernst says. Ernst’s campaign argues that in the State Senate, she has a record of bucking party lines in order to compromise. She [pushed her leadership](http://blogs.desmoinesregister.com/dmr/index.php/2011/03/16/iowas-proposal-to-punish-lies-about-military-medals-sidelined-by-legal-concerns/article?nclick%5Fcheck=1) to pass the Valor Act, which banned lying about military medals; even though many [had reservation](http://thegazette.com/2014/04/08/iowa-senate-sends-radon-crossbow-bills-to-governor)s that the bill violated the First Amendment. As a county auditor, she opposed a salary increase for county employees. Rather than simply opposing it, though, she did a survey of the county’s private businesses, asking if anyone was increasing salaries during the economic downturn. The results built support opposing the salary bump. She also took on her own party to help pass bills which required public schools to test for [dangerous toxins](http://thegazette.com/2014/04/08/iowa-senate-sends-radon-crossbow-bills-to-governor) in their buildings, protected funding for [mental health services](http://insurancenewsnet.com/oarticle/2011/10/03/iowa-revamp-of-mental-health-disabled-services-watched-closely-%5Bthe-gazette-ce-a-279792.html#.U-62v2MZ83Y) for Iowans and allowed parents of children with severe epilepsy to buy [non-addictive cannabis oil](http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/politics/2014/05/31/branstad-cannabis-oil-extract-purchase-medical-marijuana-bill-sign/9803849/). In other words, Ernst was hardly the bomb-throwing Ted Cruz of the Iowa Senate. To compare Ernst to Palin these days isn’t fair either. Palin now is more of an entertainer akin to Rush Limbaugh than a politician. But Ernst does bear a resemblance to the politician Palin once was–the Palin who had an 80% approval rating in Alaska and saw through compromise legislation. As a new governor, Palin was never shy about taking on the establishment, a trait which helped make her name, but it wasn’t until her stint as John McCain’s pitbull VP choice that she became so polarizing. To be fair, Republicans play the same comparison game with Democrats. House minority leader [Nancy Pelosi](http://www.conservapedia.com/Nancy%5FPelosi) is cartoon of “San Francisco extremism.” Wherever Sen. Elizabeth Warren goes, accusations of Typical Massachusetts Liberal follow. When Warren stumped for female candidates in [Kentucky](http://rpk.org/blog/warren-joins-grimes-liberals/) and [West Virginia](https://www.americarisingpac.org/super-liberal-senator-elizabeth-warren-coming-west-virginia-help-friend-natalie-tennant/) recently, Republicans tarred those candidates as “Elizabeth Warrens” of hyper-partisan extremists, which of course they weren’t. It is hard enough to elect women to office where they still have less than 20% representation. It becomes exponentially harder when strong women are caricatured to political ends. This is no more true than with Republican women. There was a time when Democrats labeled [Sen. Kelly Ayotte](https://www.facebook.com/notes/sarah-palin/kelly-ayotte-for-new-hampshire/410097773434) the “Sarah Palin of New Hampshire.” Ayotte has proven to be so [un-Palinesque](http://www.politico.com/story/2013/06/sarah-palin-kelly-ayotte-immigration-93468.html) that Palin withdrew her endorsement years ago. Now, it seems, Ernst is one Tina Fey sketch away from being unfairly boxed into a persona she is working hard to avoid. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/3132793/why-joni-ernst-isnt-iowas-sarah-palin/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/3132793/why-joni-ernst-isnt-iowas-sarah-palin/"},"headline":"Why Joni Ernst Isn’t 'Iowa’s Sarah Palin'","datePublished":"2014-08-18T01:48:21.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-21T09:42:50.335Z","description":"Trying to turn her into a caricature, Democrats paint Ernst as “crazy”","url":"https://time.com/3132793/why-joni-ernst-isnt-iowas-sarah-palin/","keywords":["2014 Election","Opinion topic","Sarah Palin"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt8cd4fddf5eda725c/69869fd613c79f82671937f9/453373038.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Jay Newton-Small","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/jay-newton-small/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt8cd4fddf5eda725c/69869fd613c79f82671937f9/453373038.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Iowa Politics","caption":"Iowa Politics","creditText":"Tom Williams—CQ Roll Call/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/2014-election/","name":"2014 Election"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/3132793/why-joni-ernst-isnt-iowas-sarah-palin/","name":"Why Joni Ernst Isn’t 'Iowa’s Sarah Palin'"}}]}] ```