--- title: NSA Spying Hurts Cybersecurity for All of Us Say Privacy Advocates description: The surveillance debate has focused on the legality of spying on Americans but some say the biggest danger is in the methods the NSA uses canonical: https://time.com/2966463/nsa-spying-surveillance-cybersecurity-privacy-advocates-schneier/ author: Denver Nicks article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2014-07-08T16:35:35.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-04-13T08:02:43.439Z article:section: Politics og:title: NSA Spying Hurts Cybersecurity for All of Us Say Privacy Advocates og:description: The surveillance debate has focused on the legality of spying on Americans but some say the biggest danger is in the methods the NSA uses og:url: https://time.com/2966463/nsa-spying-surveillance-cybersecurity-privacy-advocates-schneier/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte60193a52b9d4274/69869aa8810bbb6531c927f9/57585409-1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1250 og:image:height: 703 og:image:alt: FILE PHOTO NSA Compiles Massive Database Of Private Phone Calls og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: NSA Spying Hurts Cybersecurity for All of Us Say Privacy Advocates twitter:description: The surveillance debate has focused on the legality of spying on Americans but some say the biggest danger is in the methods the NSA uses twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte60193a52b9d4274/69869aa8810bbb6531c927f9/57585409-1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # NSA Spying Hurts Cybersecurity for All of Us Say Privacy Advocates > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=056c4ae6-6116-425f-9a68-236a768fa928&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=056c4ae6-6116-425f-9a68-236a768fa928&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=056c4ae6-6116-425f-9a68-236a768fa928&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=056c4ae6-6116-425f-9a68-236a768fa928&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1)  by [Denver Nicks](https://time.com/author/denver-nicks/)  ## Denver Nicks Jul 8, 2014 4:35 PM UTC  This undated photo provided by the National Security Agency (NSA) shows its headquarters in Fort Meade, Md. This undated photo provided by the National Security Agency (NSA) shows its headquarters in Fort Meade, Md. NSA/Getty Images  by [Denver Nicks](https://time.com/author/denver-nicks/)  ## Denver Nicks Jul 8, 2014 4:35 PM UTC Privacy advocates Monday slammed the National Security Agency for conducting surveillance in a way they say undermines cybersecurity for everyone and harms U.S. tech companies. “We have examples of the NSA going in and deliberately weakening security of things that we use so they can eavesdrop on particular targets,” said Bruce Schneier, a prominent cryptography writer and technologist. Schneier referenced a Reuters report that the NSA paid the computer security firm [RSA](http://swampland.time.com/2014/01/21/privacy-activists-sour-on-rsa/) $10 million to use a deliberately flawed encryption standard to facilitate easier eavesdropping, a charge RSA has denied. “This very act of undermining not only undermines our security. It undermines our fundamental trust in the things we use to achieve security. It’s very toxic,” Schneier said. In the year since former NSA contractor Edward Snowden’s first leaks, attention has focused on the Agency’s surveillance itself, fueling debates over whether it is legal and ethical to spy on American citizens or to eavesdrop on the leaders of allied countries. NSA policies that intentionally undermine cybersecurity too often get left out of the debate, said panelists Monday at a New American Foundation event titled “National Insecurity Agency: How the NSA’s Surveillance Programs Undermine Internet Security.” “If the Chinese government had proposed to put in a backdoor into our computers and then paid a company $10 million to make that the standard we would be furious,” said Joe Hall, chief technologist at the Center for Democracy and Technology. “That’s exactly what the NSA has become: the best hacker in the entire world.” In a statement to TIME, the NSA denied it had made the Internet less secure. “While we cannot comment on specific, alleged intelligence-gathering activities, NSA’s interest in any given technology is driven by the use of that technology by foreign intelligence targets. The United States pursues its intelligence mission with care to ensure that innocent users of those same technologies are not affected,” spokesperson Vanee’ Vines said. “Our participation in standards development has strengthened the core encryption technology that underpins the Internet. NSA cannot crack much of the encryption that guards global commerce – and we don’t want to.” The tension arises due to the two competing missions of the National Security Agency: electronic surveillance and protecting U.S. systems from cyberattacks. Nearly all of our online communications are encrypted in some way against [cyberattack](http://time.com/110210/ebay-data-breach/), to protect our bank accounts from thieves and our intimate lives from nosy neighbors. This poses a challenge for the NSA as the agency, since September 11, 2001, has focused less on agents of foreign governments and more on ferreting out terrorist threats. Inevitably the data of innocent people gets caught its dragnet. A [Washington Post report](http://time.com/2959592/nsa-snowden-normal-internet-users/) Sunday estimated that 90 percent of those caught in the agency’s data surveillance net—including intimate communications like family photographs and emails between lovers—are everyday Internet users not suspected of wrongdoing, many of them American citizens. The agency has sought to install “backdoors,” hardware and software systems with deliberately weakened security, into some of the most commonly used tech products, as it did in the program codenamed [PRISM](http://newsfeed.time.com/2013/06/06/prism-by-the-numbers-a-guide-to-the-governments-secret-internet-data-mining-program/). American tech companies say this hurts their business in the international marketplace, where users aren’t keen to use software that comes bugged by an American intelligence agency. Major tech firms, including Google, supported an [amendment](http://time.com/2903953/nsa-surveillance-fiscal-year-2015-department-of-defense-appropriations-act/) to the defense budget in May to prohibit the NSA from using funds for this kind of backdoor surveillance. “Maybe a year ago this sort of language might have seemed unnecessary,” Google Privacy Policy Counsel David Lieber said, “but now its actually really important to restore trust that these sorts of things are not being requested and/or required of companies.” Critics, like panelist Amie Stepanovich, senior policy counsel for the web freedom group Access, say NSA has also worked to crack and undermine encryption standards set by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (the body that establishes the security standards that help protect our email accounts, banking websites, etc.), and hoarded indexes of computer bugs the agency uses to hack into machines rather than reveal the vulnerabilities so they can be fixed. In the wake of apparently unfounded accusations that the NSA knew about the [Heartbleed](http://time.com/57402/heartbleed-bug-here-are-the-passwords-you-should-change/) bug and didn’t help fix it, the administration announced this spring it has “re-invigorated” existing policy on how it decides whether or not to disclose or exploit security vulnerabilities it finds. “Building up a huge stockpile of undisclosed vulnerabilities while leaving the Internet vulnerable and the American people unprotected would not be in our national security interest. But that is not the same as arguing that we should completely forgo this tool as a way to conduct intelligence collection,” White House Cybersecurity Coordinator Michael Daniel [wrote](http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2014/04/28/heartbleed-understanding-when-we-disclose-cyber-vulnerabilities) in April. At its core the question comes down to a cost benefit analysis. “The fundamental issue,” Schneier said, “is should we compromise the security of everybody in order to access the data of the few.” ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/2966463/nsa-spying-surveillance-cybersecurity-privacy-advocates-schneier/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/2966463/nsa-spying-surveillance-cybersecurity-privacy-advocates-schneier/"},"headline":"NSA Spying Hurts Cybersecurity for All of Us Say Privacy Advocates","datePublished":"2014-07-08T16:35:35.000Z","dateModified":"2026-04-13T08:02:43.439Z","description":"The surveillance debate has focused on the legality of spying on Americans but some say the biggest danger is in the methods the NSA uses","url":"https://time.com/2966463/nsa-spying-surveillance-cybersecurity-privacy-advocates-schneier/","keywords":["Technology","Tech","NSA","Surveillance","Domestic Surveillance","National Security"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte60193a52b9d4274/69869aa8810bbb6531c927f9/57585409-1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Denver Nicks","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/denver-nicks/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte60193a52b9d4274/69869aa8810bbb6531c927f9/57585409-1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"FILE PHOTO NSA Compiles Massive Database Of Private Phone Calls","caption":"FILE PHOTO NSA Compiles Massive Database Of Private Phone Calls","creditText":"NSA/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/technology/","name":"Technology"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/2966463/nsa-spying-surveillance-cybersecurity-privacy-advocates-schneier/","name":"NSA Spying Hurts Cybersecurity for All of Us Say Privacy Advocates"}}]}] ```