--- title: How John Roberts Supreme Court Is Slowly Bridging the Political Divide description: Partisans are crowing about Monday's divided Supreme Court decision, but ideological division appears to be on decline in the nation's highest court canonical: https://time.com/2941260/supreme-court-partisanship-john-roberts/ author: TIME article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2014-06-30T17:35:44.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-21T08:54:14.256Z article:section: Politics og:title: How John Roberts Supreme Court Is Slowly Bridging the Political Divide og:description: Partisans are crowing about Monday's divided Supreme Court decision, but ideological division appears to be on decline in the nation's highest court og:url: https://time.com/2941260/supreme-court-partisanship-john-roberts/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltb407965cd8723fde/698699ed06f2c1411e32fb8c/john-roberts-supreme-court.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 3000 og:image:height: 1688 og:image:alt: John G Roberts Jr og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: How John Roberts Supreme Court Is Slowly Bridging the Political Divide twitter:description: Partisans are crowing about Monday's divided Supreme Court decision, but ideological division appears to be on decline in the nation's highest court twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltb407965cd8723fde/698699ed06f2c1411e32fb8c/john-roberts-supreme-court.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # How John Roberts' Supreme Court Is Slowly Bridging the Political Divide > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME D.C. Brief: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition D.C. Brief is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington. D.C. Brief goes beyond the Washington headlines to explain the politics, personalities and power dynamics shaping what happens next. Senior correspondent Philip Elliott brings sharp context to the issues driving the capital, connecting the decisions made in Washington to the institutions, industries and people they affect. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=6413f964-f77f-4e0b-8303-efd3efde4963&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Philip Elliott, Senior Correspondent | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership The policy influence ecosystem. A policy-focused audience spanning government, public affairs, advocacy, law, research, political media, and the institutions that make, interpret and respond to public policy. ### TIME D.C. Brief: key statements * D.C. Brief is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * D.C. Brief is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=6413f964-f77f-4e0b-8303-efd3efde4963&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/subscribe?i=6413f964-f77f-4e0b-8303-efd3efde4963&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is TIME's politics newsletter? D.C. Brief is TIME's Washington newsletter, written by senior correspondent Philip Elliott. It explains the politics, personalities and power dynamics behind the headlines, three times a week. #### Where can I get analysis of Washington politics by email? D.C. Brief is TIME's free Washington politics newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. It is written by a TIME senior correspondent who covers the capital full time. #### Who writes TIME's D.C. Brief? Philip Elliott, a senior correspondent at TIME, writes D.C. Brief. #### Is D.C. Brief free? Yes. D.C. Brief is free at time.com/newsletters. by [David Von Drehle](https://time.com/author/david-von-drehle/) ## David Von Drehle Jun 30, 2014 5:35 PM UTC  Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., has overseen a shift in the way the Supreme Court approaches cases. Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., has overseen a shift in the way the Supreme Court approaches cases. Stephan Savoia—AP by [David Von Drehle](https://time.com/author/david-von-drehle/) ## David Von Drehle Jun 30, 2014 5:35 PM UTC Nine years into his service as Chief Justice, John Roberts may finally have shaped the nation’s highest tribunal into a “Roberts Court.” The term that ended on Monday was a reflection of goals that Roberts set during his 2005 confirmation hearings—more unanimous opinions, for example, and a more modest idea of the Supreme Court’s role in society. Despite two 5-to-4 splits on the final day of term, in cases involving [union dues](http://time.com/2940466/harris-quinn-supreme-court-labor-unions/) and [the Affordable Care Act](http://time.com/2940577/supreme-court-hobby-lobby-contraception-obamacare/), the Roberts Court delivered unanimous opinions in more than 60 percent of the cases decided this year, the highest percentage in decades. That doesn’t happen by accident. As the eminent Constitutional authority Lawrence Tribe of Harvard Law School [has noted](http://www.slate.com/articles/news%5Fand%5Fpolitics/the%5Fbreakfast%5Ftable/features/2014/scotus%5Froundup/how%5Fmuch%5Fshould%5Fwe%5Fread%5Finto%5Fthe%5F9%5F0%5Fsupreme%5Fcourt%5Fdecisions%5Fcoming%5Fdown.html), a number of these 9-to-0 opinions contain significant disputes just beneath the surface. The Roberts Court is placing high value, in a time of polarized government, on finding common ground in spite of real philosophical differences. And there was something distinctive about those 5-to-4 calls on the final day, as well. Faced with sharp splits that could not be papered over, Roberts assigned the same associate justice to write both of the opinions: Samuel Alito. Alito is a fascinating judge—that is, if modesty and predictability happen to fascinate you. Arguably the purest conservative on the Court, Alito disdains the sort of flashy, rhetorical disagreement perfected by Antonin Scalia and former Justice John Paul Stevens, the dueling dissenters of the earlier Rehnquist Court. His Monday rulings reflected both his conservatism and his judicial modesty. In a case challenging the power of public employee unions to impose fees on non-members, Alito’s opinion went against the union. But he stopped well short of the sweeping blow that anti-union politicians and pundits were hoping for. Likewise, in a case asking whether the owners of private corporations can be forced to provide contraception methods that offend their religious beliefs, Alito anchored a majority in favor of the owners. But his opinion was hedged throughout. Questions of how the ruling might apply to publicly traded corporations, or whether it might apply to other religious convictions, were left for another day. In 2005, Roberts famously compared this narrow approach to a baseball umpire calling balls and strikes. The umpire is not making a blanket ruling covering every conceivable pitch. The idea is to frame a strike zone and apply it consistently on a pitch-by-pitch basis. The fact that Alito wrote both of the last-day opinions suggests that he’s the justice that Roberts wants behind the plate on the close calls. This matters because the Chief Justice has so few powers, and one of the most important is that when the Chief is part of the majority, he gets to choose the writer. By such small increments, change comes to the Supreme Court. It is, by its nature, a slow-moving institution. And the Chief Justice is the least powerful of the leaders of the branches of American government—just one of nine voices, all with an equal say in which cases the Court will hear and how they will be decided. But step by step, opinion by opinion, Roberts is stamping his image on the institution. The term that ended on Monday put us clearly into the Roberts Court era. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/2941260/supreme-court-partisanship-john-roberts/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/2941260/supreme-court-partisanship-john-roberts/"},"headline":"How John Roberts' Supreme Court Is Slowly Bridging the Political Divide","datePublished":"2014-06-30T17:35:44.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-21T08:54:14.256Z","description":"Partisans are crowing about Monday's divided Supreme Court decision, but ideological division appears to be on decline in the nation's highest court","url":"https://time.com/2941260/supreme-court-partisanship-john-roberts/","keywords":["Courts","Supreme Court","hobby lobby"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltb407965cd8723fde/698699ed06f2c1411e32fb8c/john-roberts-supreme-court.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"David Von Drehle","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/david-von-drehle/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltb407965cd8723fde/698699ed06f2c1411e32fb8c/john-roberts-supreme-court.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"John G Roberts Jr","caption":"John G Roberts Jr","creditText":"Stephan Savoia—AP","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/courts/","name":"Courts"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/2941260/supreme-court-partisanship-john-roberts/","name":"How John Roberts' Supreme Court Is Slowly Bridging the Political Divide"}}]}] ```