--- title: Stem Cell Researcher Calls for Retraction of His Own Work description: Japanese co-author says “I’m no longer sure that the articles are correct.” canonical: https://time.com/20082/stem-cell-researcher-calls-for-retraction-of-his-own-work/ author: Alice Park article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2014-03-11T16:34:24.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-21T06:42:20.428Z article:section: Health og:title: Stem Cell Researcher Calls for Retraction of His Own Work og:description: Japanese co-author says “I’m no longer sure that the articles are correct.” og:url: https://time.com/20082/stem-cell-researcher-calls-for-retraction-of-his-own-work/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production og:image:width: 1200 og:image:height: 675 og:image:alt: TIME og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Stem Cell Researcher Calls for Retraction of His Own Work twitter:description: Japanese co-author says “I’m no longer sure that the articles are correct.” twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production --- # Stem Cell Researcher Calls for Retraction of His Own Work > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=4cd85e7a-a9c6-494c-b1ca-d3aac1bc1852&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=4cd85e7a-a9c6-494c-b1ca-d3aac1bc1852&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=4cd85e7a-a9c6-494c-b1ca-d3aac1bc1852&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=4cd85e7a-a9c6-494c-b1ca-d3aac1bc1852&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1)  by [Alice Park](https://time.com/author/alice-park/)  ## Alice Park Senior Correspondent Mar 11, 2014 4:34 PM UTC  by [Alice Park](https://time.com/author/alice-park/)  ## Alice Park Senior Correspondent Mar 11, 2014 4:34 PM UTC [Teruhiko Wakayama](http://content.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,14144,00.html), a respected stem cell scientist from Japan’s RIKEN Institute, said he is not certain about the methods used in two studies he co-authored with lead investigator Haruko Obokata. In the [ground-breaking work](http://time.com/2583/growing-your-own-tissue-just-add-stress-and-stir/), heralded by some in the field as a game-changer in the way stem cells are made, Obokata and her team, which included researchers from Harvard University and other international institutes, detailed how they were able to coax already developed cells to revert back to an embryonic-like state to become [stem cells](http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2078130,00.html) by simply exposing them to chemical solutions (mostly acidic) or physical stress. Stem cells can be manipulated to develop into any of the body’s tissues to repair or replace diseased cells. The controversy erupted when Obokata and her team published a tips sheet for other researchers to follow to replicate their work. But inconsistencies between the newly released methods and the original protocol in the papers, as well as questions about images in the published work, led some to wonder about the validity of the results. Wakayama himself said he was able to repeat the study only once, with Obokata’s assistance, but not on his own. **MORE:** [The Rise and Fall of the Cloning King](http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1145236,00.html) In a press conference in Japan last month, Wakayama, who is best known for using stem cell techniques to clone mice, said he asked all of the scientists involved to retract the papers, which were published in the journal _Nature_ in January, and to have the data and results reviewed by other scientists. RIKEN is investigating the work, as is _Nature_. The development adds another black eye to the field of stem cell science, which is ripe with possibility but has struggled to establish its credibility. In 2006, Korean researcher Woo Suk Hwang [claimed he had become the first to successfully “clone” human cells](http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1064448,00.html), generating patient-specific lines of stem cells from a person’s skin cell. The work [turned out to be fraudulent](http://content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1147490,00.html), and the stem cells derived from an already established technique of extracting them from existing embryos. Since then, both policy makers and those in the field have been more skeptical of milestone claims – for good reason, as the latest study shows. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/20082/stem-cell-researcher-calls-for-retraction-of-his-own-work/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/20082/stem-cell-researcher-calls-for-retraction-of-his-own-work/"},"headline":"Stem Cell Researcher Calls for Retraction of His Own Work","datePublished":"2014-03-11T16:34:24.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-21T06:42:20.428Z","description":"Japanese co-author says “I’m no longer sure that the articles are correct.”","url":"https://time.com/20082/stem-cell-researcher-calls-for-retraction-of-his-own-work/","keywords":["Stem Cells"],"thumbnailUrl":"","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Alice Park","jobTitle":"Senior Correspondent","url":"https://time.com/author/alice-park/"}],"articleSection":"Health","image":[],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/health/","name":"Health"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/20082/stem-cell-researcher-calls-for-retraction-of-his-own-work/","name":"Stem Cell Researcher Calls for Retraction of His Own Work"}}]}] ```