Plus: It's time to triple renewables |

Trump's Latest Election Talking Point? EVs
By Justin Worland
Senior Correspondent

Donald Trump wants to put climate change squarely at the center of the Republican primary—just not in the way those concerned about climate change might want. As his GOP primary opponents debated in California last night, Trump hosted counterprogramming by way of a rally for non-union auto parts workers in Michigan. Amid all of his usual bluster, he landed one of his new favorite criticisms of President Biden: a sharp critique of Biden’s electric vehicle push.

“You’re going to lose your beautiful way of life,” Trump told the raucous crowds. “For auto workers, Biden's forced transition is a transition to hell.”

Since the early days of the Biden Administration, I’ve been writing about how climate change will become a part of the political landscape in surprising ways, and there is perhaps no better example than Trump railing against EVs.

It’s an important indicator of how climate policies are likely to play on the campaign trail. Many observers look at the polls to judge how much voters care about climate change, and decide Americans don’t care all that much, even in the midst of record-breaking extreme weather. And yet, if the past months are any indicator, climate policy will be front and center as Biden tries to prove that his economic agenda is delivering green jobs and Trump pushes back.

Former President Donald Trump Speaks In Clinton, Michigan
Scott Olson—Getty Images
Former U.S. President Donald Trump speaks speaks at a campaign rally at Drake Enterprises, an automotive parts manufacturer, on Sept. 27, 2023 in Clinton Township, Michigan.

At the core of Trump’s professed hatred of Biden’s EV push is an argument that the technology harms American workers. It will come as little surprise to anyone paying attention that Trump’s speech was filled with falsehoods and half truths. He claimed, for example, that if the U.S. pursues EVs the American auto industry would shut down within a few years as jobs move to China. In reality, most analysts think building EVs in the U.S. will help the country better compete with China.

It’s perhaps more interesting to consider the element of Trump’s argument that holds a grain of truth: the messiness of the transition to electric vehicles for labor. Indeed, Republicans participating in the official primary debate also picked up on that point. Simply put, making an electric vehicle requires less labor than making its gasoline counterpart, and so it stands to reason that in the long run the auto industry will employ fewer workers. Moreover, the workers that the industry does employ will need different skill sets. Undoubtedly, Biden has accelerated the transition to electric vehicles with tax incentives and other industry support.

But blaming Biden for the challenges facing labor misses the forest for the trees. The global auto market has increasingly shifted toward electric vehicles, so much so that Biden’s policies are really just helping the U.S. play catch up. And, while companies were keen to take advantage of tax credits, they began their multi-billion dollar electric-vehicle investments while Trump was still in office. What’s more, Biden has sought to minimize friction with programs to train workers for the transition and ensure higher wages. It remains to be seen how well the administration will be able to execute these transition programs, but they do signal that Biden is trying to grapple with realities of a changing market rather than talk it away as Trump does.

All this leads to a tricky political dynamic. Biden’s policies are intended to help the U.S. adapt to a changing global economy and tackle climate change at the same time, but his efforts will take time to unfold. In the meantime, it’s easy for a populist, reactionary politician to point to Biden’s agenda as the cause of complex problems with little political consequence.

The whole thing reminds me a bit of Trump’s equally impossible claim during his 2016 campaign that he would save the coal industry and its jobs. He held rallies in coal country touting that claim and highlighting it at campaign events. Despite this, employment in the industry flatlined during his presidency and coal-fired power plants in the U.S. continued to close. Nonetheless, he still enjoys support from those constituencies.

The Biden Administration is certainly aware of the challenge. From the get-go, Biden has framed his climate agenda around jobs. Now, he just needs to convince the American public.

“What we're going to do is go out and tell the story,” John Podesta, who’s overseeing the implementation of the Inflation Reduction Act climate law, told me over the summer. “The administration has delivered legislation that supports the clean energy future. It's happening. It's creating deep roots on the ground. And then I think the politics will catch up with that.”

A New Data Point
The Rise of Renewables

In 2021, the International Energy Agency (IEA) released a landmark roadmap charting the narrow pathway the world could follow to get to net-zero carbon emissions over the coming decades. On Tuesday, following two years and much economic and geopolitical disruption, the IEA published an update showing that a tight—but still viable—path remains open to get there.

At the core of the IEA’s report is the assessment that we need to rapidly deploy existing technologies. The biggest potential step in that direction would be to triple renewable energy capacity by 2030. Technically, the IEA finds that goal more than feasible, but it would require a gargantuan effort to fix faulty electric grids, accelerate permitting, and secure supply chains. Improving energy efficiency, electrifying buildings, and stamping out methane emissions would all also play a significant role to get the world on a net-zero path.


All of those changes would result in an energy system that by 2050 relies primarily on renewables with a small, residual role for fossil fuels.

What Else To Know
Rooftop Solar’s Dark Side

My colleague Alana Semuels looks at the pervasive problem of non-functional leased rooftop solar systems and finds consumers are increasingly complaining.

Read More »
Climate Change’s Changing Vocabulary

My colleague Jeffery Kluger looks into the history of how the language we use to talk about climate change has evolved.

Read More »
Climate Week

I reflect on the madness of New York Climate Week and the United Nations General Assembly and explain why struggling to build clean energy infrastructure actually indicates that the energy transition is in full swing.

Read More »
Day In Court

Young people are taking the fight against climate change to court. Again. The BBC reports on a new lawsuit from six young people in Portugal suing 32 European countries over their inaction on climate change.

Read More »

This edition was written by Justin Worland, and edited by Kyla Mandel and Elijah Wolfson. We welcome any feedback at

TIME may receive compensation for some links to products and services in this email. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
Connect with TIME via Facebook | Twitter | Newsletters
TIME Customer Service, P.O. Box 37508, Boone, IA 50037-0508
Questions? Contact
Copyright © 2023 TIME USA, LLC. All rights reserved.