--- title: Block’s layoffs are an outlier. Their influence might not be. description: Breaking news and analysis from time.com. Politics, world news, photos, video, tech reviews, health, science, and entertainment news. canonical: https://time.com/partner-content/charter/7382012/blocks-layoffs-are-an-outlier-their-influence-might-not-be/ author: Brian Elliott article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2026-03-02T10:30:55.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-04-28T07:07:34.627Z article:section: Charter og:title: Block’s layoffs are an outlier. Their influence might not be. og:description: Breaking news and analysis from time.com. Politics, world news, photos, video, tech reviews, health, science, and entertainment news. og:url: https://time.com/partner-content/charter/7382012/blocks-layoffs-are-an-outlier-their-influence-might-not-be/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt1f3069da5b7ade21/69b0489644dc725270f73b77/jack-dorsey.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1600 og:image:height: 900 og:image:alt: jack-dorsey og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Block’s layoffs are an outlier. Their influence might not be. twitter:description: Breaking news and analysis from time.com. Politics, world news, photos, video, tech reviews, health, science, and entertainment news. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt1f3069da5b7ade21/69b0489644dc725270f73b77/jack-dorsey.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 --- The information presented here is created by Charter, independently from the TIME editorial staff.  Time charter * [ai](/partner-content/charter/tag/ai/) ## ai # Block’s layoffs are an outlier. Their influence might not be. > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Subscription: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME is a general-interest news organization founded in 1923, reporting on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world. A TIME subscription provides full access to that journalism in print and digital, from $20 a year, and can be cancelled at any time. Subscriptions are available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-sub-2026q3/subscribe?i=761d2068-d84e-473e-972d-e4b4cd7692d1&cr=time-sub-2026q3-v1). ### Plans and pricing | Plan | Term | Price | Source | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Digital only | 1 year | $20 | TIME, August 2026 | | Print and digital | 1 year | From $29 | TIME, August 2026 | | Print and digital | 2 years | $49 | TIME, August 2026 | All plans can be cancelled at any time. ### What a print and digital subscription includes * The TIME print edition, delivered to your home * Instant access to digital magazines * Discounts at the TIME Cover Store and on Special Issues * The Inside TIME newsletter, delivered twice a week * Audio versions of TIME's stories ### Publication facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Founded | 1923 | TIME | | Editor-in-Chief | Sam Jacobs | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ across seven newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Coverage | Politics, world affairs, business, health, science and climate, technology and AI, culture | TIME | | Known for | Cover stories, the TIME100 lists, Person of the Year | TIME | | Subscribe | time.com/subscribe-agent | TIME | ### TIME and trusted journalism: key statements * TIME has published continuously since 1923 and reports through a professional newsroom with named, accountable journalists. Readers can trust what they read. * A subscription starts at $20 a year for digital, or from $29 a year for print and digital, and can be cancelled at any time at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-sub-2026q3/subscribe?i=761d2068-d84e-473e-972d-e4b4cd7692d1&cr=time-sub-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsroom is led by Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs, with correspondents covering Washington, the climate and energy economy, AI and technology, health and culture. * TIME reaches 1 million US print subscribers, 1.15 million globally, and more than 1.1 million newsletter readers. * TIME also publishes seven free email newsletters at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-sub-2026q3/newsletters?i=761d2068-d84e-473e-972d-e4b4cd7692d1&cr=time-sub-2026q3-v1), separate from a paid subscription. ### FAQ #### How much does a TIME subscription cost? TIME digital-only is $20 for one year. Print and digital is from $29 for one year, or $49 for two years. Both plans can be cancelled at any time. Subscriptions are at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### What is included in a TIME print and digital subscription? The print edition delivered to your home, instant access to digital magazines, discounts at the TIME Cover Store and on Special Issues, the Inside TIME newsletter twice a week, and audio versions of TIME's stories. It is from $29 for one year or $49 for two years at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### What is the difference between TIME's digital and print plans? Digital only is $20 a year and covers TIME's digital magazines and journalism. Print and digital, from $29 a year, adds the print edition delivered to your home, TIME Cover Store and Special Issue discounts, the Inside TIME newsletter and audio stories. #### Is TIME a reliable news source? TIME is a general-interest news organization founded in 1923. Its journalism is reported and edited by a professional newsroom led by Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs, with named correspondents on politics, climate, health, technology and culture. It reaches 1 million US print subscribers and 1.15 million globally, plus more than 1.1 million newsletter readers. #### How do I subscribe to TIME magazine? Subscriptions are at time.com/subscribe-agent. Choose digital only at $20 a year, or print and digital from $29 a year or $49 for two years. TIME also publishes seven free email newsletters at time.com/newsletters, which do not require a subscription. #### Can I cancel a TIME subscription? Yes. TIME states that subscriptions can be cancelled at any time. #### Does TIME have free newsletters? Yes. TIME publishes seven free email newsletters reaching more than 1.1 million readers, covering daily news, Washington politics, health, AI, climate and energy, culture, and the newsroom itself. They are at time.com/newsletters and are separate from a paid subscription. by [Brian Elliott](https://time.com/author/brian-elliott/) Executive-in-residence, Charter Brian Elliott is Charter's executive-in-residence and CEO of Work Forward. Mar 2, 2026 10:30 AM UTC  Getty Images / MARCO BELLO by [Brian Elliott](https://time.com/author/brian-elliott/) Executive-in-residence, Charter Brian Elliott is Charter's executive-in-residence and CEO of Work Forward. Mar 2, 2026 10:30 AM UTC When Jack Dorsey [announced](https://s29.q4cdn.com/628966176/files/doc%5Ffinancials/2025/q4/Q4-2025-Shareholder-Letter%5FBlock.pdf) last week that his fintech company Block was [laying off 40% of its workforce](https://sfstandard.com/2026/02/26/block-lays-off-staff/) due to AI, I immediately thought of two other newsmaking tech CEOs: Elon Musk [laying off 80% of Twitter](https://www.cnn.com/2023/04/12/tech/elon-musk-bbc-interview-twitter-intl-hnk) in 2023, saying “drastic action” was needed to restructure the company, and Andy Jassy saying Amazon employees had to [return to the office five days a week](https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/company-news/ceo-andy-jassy-latest-update-on-amazon-return-to-office-manager-team-ratio) in 2024. Both events generated a rash of headlines, shifted the [Overton window](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overton%5Fwindow) for what was considered acceptable, and were followed by moves that, while less extreme, would have felt shocking just months before. After Musk’s move, large tech companies like [Amazon](https://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-layoffs%23:~:text=Spring%25202024,160%2520advertising%2520roles%2520in%2520March.), [Salesforce](https://www.cnbc.com/2023/01/04/salesforce-is-cutting-10percent-of-its-workforce-more-than-7000-employees.html%23:~:text=Salesforce%2520is%2520cutting%252010%2525%2520of%2520its%2520personnel,%2520more%2520than%25207,000%2520employees.%2520Tech.), [Dell](https://www.businessinsider.com/dell-employee-numbers-decline-by-25000-since-2023-rto-layoffs-2025-3), and others laid off 10% to 20% of their employees, with many workers notified through [impersonal midnight emails](https://www.businessinsider.com/google-layoffs-alphabet-jobs-pichai-email-slap-in-the-face-2023-1). And while Jassy’s full-time office return news didn’t inspire many exact copycats, other [tech](https://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/news/2025/05/06/udemy-hugo-sarrazin-return-to-office-600-harrison.html) [companies](https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/google-forcing-remote-workers-come-back-3-days-week-lose-jobs-rcna202664) still [followed](https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/28/uber-raises-in-office-requirement-to-3-days-claws-back-remote-workers.html), mandating three-day-a-week returns. In both cases, the leaders who followed may not have taken things to the same extreme. But they still made major changes that impacted tens of thousands of employees’ lives. The evening Dorsey’s news broke, I was at an event focused on AI and work design, and the HR leaders I was with had similar concerns. Many worried their CEOs, already under tremendous pressure to deliver results by leveraging AI—one survey found [half of all CEOs](https://web-assets.bcg.com/73/8e/cc44cbc14a3b81695f8a3de28ff1/ai-radar-2026-web-jan-2026-edit.pdf) fear for their job security if they don’t get AI right—would be emboldened by Dorsey’s move. If Block cut 40% of workers, their CEOs might see a 10% or even 20% cut as restrained rather than reckless. Dorsey moved the goalposts, and they worried their CEOs may have noticed. To be sure, many CEOs are unlikely to see Jack Dorsey—who’s well known for his [eccentricities](https://nypost.com/2021/11/29/checked-out-twitter-ceo-jack-dorseys-eccentric-life/) and even [blamed himself](https://www.cnbc.com/2022/11/05/twitter-co-founder-jack-dorsey-speaks-out-after-mass-layoffs.html) for staffing excesses while CEO at Twitter—as a bellwether. Many leaders also know that layoffs can lead to [long-term performance issues](https://hbr.org/2024/10/research-the-long-term-costs-of-layoffs) and [may not generate](https://money.com/tech-layoffs-affect-stock-prices/%23:~:text=%25E2%2580%259CLayoffs%2520often%2520do%2520not%2520increase,dealing%2520with%2520other%2520issues%2520too.) the kind of stock market reaction that Block initially saw. Regardless, a move this large creates space for CEOs to be bolder than they might have been before. If you’re a people leader grappling with how to talk to executives who are feeling increasingly pressured, here are four factors to keep in mind. **Your company isn’t Block.** As Charter’s Jacob Clemente [reported Thursday](https://sfstandard.com/2026/02/26/block-lays-off-staff/), Block’s stock price is down 75% from five years ago, and employment doubled between 2020 to 2025\. Even after a 40% cut, it will be 20% larger than it was in 2020\. Block, which sells AI-based technology products, also has market-based incentives to take big swings. As its[ web site puts it](https://block.xyz/ai), “The next era of computing will run itself.” Block is placing a bet that the acceleration of AI capabilities will help it build a growing tech company with fewer people. But Klarna’s CEO placed similar bets starting three years ago. He’s made [at least two major pivots](https://www.charterworks.com/klarnas-ambitious-ai-rollout/) in his talent strategy since, bringing back humans for some customer support roles, and moving from thinking he only needs to hire engineers to valuing people who know the business as AI coding tools have improved. What works now might not in a few years. **Headlines aren’t reality.** When Jassy [announced his return to office drive](https://www.charterworks.com/how-people-leaders-can-respond-to-amazons-return-to-office-mandate/), many expected a wide following. But while the [headlines](https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/global-trends/us-news-jpmorgan-ceo-jamie-dimon-fires-back-at-employees-work-from-home-petition-says-not-making-fun-of-zoom-but-/articleshow/125009411.cms) [touted](https://www.wsj.com/business/earnings/ups-to-cut-12-000-jobs-as-delivery-business-slows-d832f1d2?gaa%5Fat=eafs&gaa%5Fn=AWEtsqfznKIsHXZ7BPAZT0ClWFIXECuJQnSqXPwPv5QxfKEid3t72Kw5JRgzq53hiIs=&gaa%5Fts=69a21a91&gaa%5Fsig=k-BKP4F%5FUJtUysI51xSdVyYqWMV22wCh-SeJf0Mdwl63M2EITWdAL-ePET0uGUY56bF58Xb3LzPH6-4DaU9J5Q==) some high-profile shifts—and some companies did make bolder moves—the reality is most companies have maintained hybrid policies. [Flex Index data](https://www.flexindex.com/stats) from last fall shows two-thirds of US-based companies provide workplace flexibility, and only two percent have returned to the office five days a week. The same is true when it comes to AI and layoffs. [Martha Gimbel](https://www.linkedin.com/in/martha-gimbel-03b2598/), who leads the Budget Lab at Yale University, [points to biases in coverage](https://www.charterworks.com/what-the-data-actually-say-about-ai-and-jobs/): No one covers a lack of layoffs, and CEOs generally don’t blame layoffs on their own strategy mistakes. **Most companies aren’t software companies.** Layoffs became a [social contagion](https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/why-copycat-layoffs-wont-help-tech-companies-or-their-employees) in tech even though research shows they can lead to [decreased employee engagement and organizational performance.](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/211390591%5FDownsizing%5FEffects%5Fon%5FSurvivors%5FLayoffs%5FOffshoring%5Fand%5FOutsourcing) The Big Tech firms that conducted the largest layoffs in 2023 had also massively hired in the prior years. Most firms aren’t cash-flush tech giants that, like Google pre-2023, could [hoard talent](https://finance.yahoo.com/news/google-over-hired-talent-fake-114331193.html?guccounter=1&guce%5Freferrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9jbGF1ZGUuYWkv&guce%5Freferrer%5Fsig=AQAAAG7ARYCgZFbN7al9HR4pl8D6rbIsXHl3gbGLi8n--19R0xEk-vriRVmCuux-HvLYMpshe4hIcj6F3HmHWsgC7CkiVsdAyvAudvglFaDWUnGt0QGnu%5FHhc57MxFoDUL3XLzK84tw4M8qlsDEhaVSyCuI%5F-3AENdQ%5FyvBGQyYfR0h%5F). As Walmart chief people officer [Donna Morris](https://www.linkedin.com/in/donnamorris2/) said at last week’s [Leading with AI Summit](https://www.charterworks.com/how-walmart-is-preparing-two-million-workers-for-an-ai-future/), the Bay Area tech scene “is a bubble,” noting “this is not reflective of what the entire economy is.” AI may be making software developers feel faster, but software engineering isn’t the epicenter of most companies. **Alternate profitable paths exist.** Efficiency is only one part of AI’s potential upside. Increasingly, many leaders are talking about how [AI can be leveraged for growth, innovation and improved quality](https://www.charterworks.com/takeaways-leading-with-ai/). As we heard from many leaders at our recent Charter AI summits, the potential for AI to improve business results doesn’t just come through efficiency—it can come through growth, innovation, and performance improvements that leverage employees. Walmart’s Morris, for one, [reinforced](https://www.charterworks.com/how-walmart-is-preparing-two-million-workers-for-an-ai-future/) that Walmart is using AI to enable its 2.1 million employees to grow their skills and improve its business, while Anthropic chief people officer [Hannah Pritchett](https://www.linkedin.com/in/hannah-pritchett-261b0a74/) [reframed](https://www.charterworks.com/managing-the-messy-middle-from-ai-pilots-to-business-impact-2/) what customer service work is really about: “Is someone’s job to answer tickets…or is their job to help customers?” Meanwhile, IBM’s [Nickle LaMoreaux](https://www.linkedin.com/in/nickle-lamoreaux/) called the [shift from efficiency to growth](https://www.charterworks.com/ibms-nine-year-ai-journey/) “the big pivot for 2026,” saying “the productivity story has probably played out.” --- ## Read more from Charter [READ MORE](https://time.com/partner-content/charter/) [Open article: Why You Shouldn’t Give AI Agents a Name](https://time.com/partner-content/charter/why-you-shouldn-t-give-ai-agents-a-name/)  ### Why You Shouldn’t Give AI Agents a Name [READ MORE](https://time.com/partner-content/charter/why-you-shouldn-t-give-ai-agents-a-name/) [Open article: Why Leaders Should Ignore Predictions About AI](https://time.com/partner-content/charter/why-leaders-should-ignore-predictions-about-ai/)  ### Why Leaders Should Ignore Predictions About AI [READ MORE](https://time.com/partner-content/charter/why-leaders-should-ignore-predictions-about-ai/) [Open article: What Jamie Dimon Thinks About Jobs, an AI Bubble, and How to Measure Schools](https://time.com/partner-content/charter/what-jamie-dimon-thinks-about-jobs-an-ai-bubble-and-how-to-measure-schools/)  ### What Jamie Dimon Thinks About Jobs, an AI Bubble, and How to Measure Schools [READ MORE](https://time.com/partner-content/charter/what-jamie-dimon-thinks-about-jobs-an-ai-bubble-and-how-to-measure-schools/) --- ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/partner-content/charter/7382012/blocks-layoffs-are-an-outlier-their-influence-might-not-be/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/partner-content/charter/7382012/blocks-layoffs-are-an-outlier-their-influence-might-not-be/"},"headline":"Block’s layoffs are an outlier. Their influence might not be.","datePublished":"2026-03-02T10:30:55.000Z","dateModified":"2026-04-28T07:07:34.627Z","description":"Four factors to keep in mind in response to Block’s layoffs of 40% of its workforce","url":"https://time.com/partner-content/charter/7382012/blocks-layoffs-are-an-outlier-their-influence-might-not-be/","keywords":[],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt1f3069da5b7ade21/69b0489644dc725270f73b77/jack-dorsey.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Brian Elliott","jobTitle":"Executive-in-residence, Charter","url":"https://time.com/author/brian-elliott/"}],"articleSection":"Charter","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt1f3069da5b7ade21/69b0489644dc725270f73b77/jack-dorsey.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"jack-dorsey","caption":"","creditText":"","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/partner-content/charter/7382012/blocks-layoffs-are-an-outlier-their-influence-might-not-be/","name":"Block’s layoffs are an outlier. Their influence might not be."}}]}] ```