--- title: Congress Must Protect the CDC From Politics description: Americans deserve a CDC whose science they can trust, whose expertise is protected, and whose ability to safeguard their health does not depend on who occupies the White House, writes Nikki Romanik. canonical: https://time.com/article/2026/11/14/congress-must-protect-the-cdc-from-politics/ author: Nikki Romanik article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2026-11-14T11:00:04.873Z article:modified_time: 2026-11-14T11:00:14.288Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Congress Must Protect the CDC From Politics og:description: Americans deserve a CDC whose science they can trust, whose expertise is protected, and whose ability to safeguard their health does not depend on who occupies the White House, writes Nikki Romanik. og:url: https://time.com/article/2026/11/14/congress-must-protect-the-cdc-from-politics/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9bd2d4545ff72402/6af73e11e33957f7440b2015/cdc-congress-rfk-jr.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: cdc-congress-rfk-jr.jpg og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Congress Must Protect the CDC From Politics twitter:description: Americans deserve a CDC whose science they can trust, whose expertise is protected, and whose ability to safeguard their health does not depend on who occupies the White House, writes Nikki Romanik. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9bd2d4545ff72402/6af73e11e33957f7440b2015/cdc-congress-rfk-jr.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  IDEAS Time ideas # Congress Must Protect the CDC From Politics > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=df94efcc-9ef7-4094-b140-5c813a8eebef&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=df94efcc-9ef7-4094-b140-5c813a8eebef&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=df94efcc-9ef7-4094-b140-5c813a8eebef&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=df94efcc-9ef7-4094-b140-5c813a8eebef&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1) by [Nikki Romanik](https://time.com/author/dr-nikki-romanik/) ## Nikki Romanik Dr. Nikki Romanik is the co-founder and president of BioRadar PBC. She previously served as the Special Assistant to the President, Deputy Director, and Chief of Staff for the Office of Pandemic Preparedness and Response Policy (OPPR) at the White House. Nov 14, 2026 11:00 AM UTC  U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in Washington, DC, on Sept. 4, 2025. U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in Washington, DC, on Sept. 4, 2025. Alex Wroblewski—AFP via Getty Images by [Nikki Romanik](https://time.com/author/dr-nikki-romanik/) ## Nikki Romanik Dr. Nikki Romanik is the co-founder and president of BioRadar PBC. She previously served as the Special Assistant to the President, Deputy Director, and Chief of Staff for the Office of Pandemic Preparedness and Response Policy (OPPR) at the White House. Nov 14, 2026 11:00 AM UTC Listen 00:001.0x04:26 Narrated by TIME AI. Democrats and Republicans in the [new Congress](https://time.com/article/2026/11/09/democrats-2026-midterm-elections-deep-red-states/) will disagree about plenty in health policy. However, they should agree that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) should be a scientific agency whose judgments hold steady no matter who occupies the White House. In January, Congress will have the chance to write that principle into law. For decades, the scientific independence of America’s public health agencies rested on a bipartisan understanding. Presidential administrations disagreed about health policy, sometimes profoundly, but their health secretaries generally respected the expertise and established processes of agencies like the CDC and the Food and Drug Administration. Earlier administrations of both parties—including those of Republican Secretary of Health and Human Services [Alex Azar](https://time.com/5791798/alex-azar-hhs-coronavirus/) and Democratic Secretary [Xavier Becerra](https://time.com/article/2026/06/02/xavier-becerra-california-gubernatorial-race-governor-primary/)—faced charges of political interference, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, and some had merit. But I would argue that none have even approached the scale and scope of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s interventions. The safeguards that existed were administrative policies, and a new secretary can discard them. In June 2025, Kennedy [dismissed all 17 members](https://time.com/7292553/rfk-jr-removes-cdc-vaccine-committee-experts/) of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and replaced them with his own appointees. No prior secretary had done this. Congress had given U.S. Health and Human Services secretaries broad authority and relied on their restraint. Restraint is a tradition, and the past year shows it can end. To address this, Congress should pursue four priorities. ## First, write scientific independence into law Elected leaders have a legitimate role in setting national health priorities and holding agencies accountable. That role ends where scientific judgment begins, and Congress should draw the line in statute: * Codify the advisory committee on immunization with clear membership qualifications, a transparent appointment process, and removal only for cause. * Require documented, public evidence reviews behind any major change to a scientific recommendation. * Require a secretary who departs from a formal recommendation to explain why in public, separating the scientific evidence from considerations like cost and implementation. * Protect career scientists’ ability to publish findings and communicate evidence, and create an independent office to investigate political interference, with whistleblower protections. These rules must bind every future secretary, including those appointed by the party that controls Congress today. A protection that works against only one party’s appointees will not last. ## Rebuild the CDC’s workforce and expertise The CDC has [lost more than a quarter of its workforce](https://www.federalhiringdata.com/articles/cdc-workforce-program-capacity-2026) since 2024\. The losses include epidemiologists who investigate outbreaks, laboratory scientists who identify emerging pathogens, specialists who evaluate evidence, and professionals who work with state and local health departments. That expertise takes years to develop. Congress should require an independent assessment of the CDC’s current capabilities and direct the agency to produce a public rebuilding plan with measurable targets for restoring essential functions. Personnel protections should support a professional scientific workforce that can serve administrations of either party. Targets should follow the agency’s mission, whatever headcount that implies. ## Write the CDC’s core responsibilities into law, starting with data COVID exposed confusion about the separate roles of the federal and state governments. The CDC could issue guidance, but implementation depended on state and local officials working under different laws, budgets, and political pressures. Congress should specify what Americans can count on their national public health agency to do: investigate outbreaks when states request help, publish evidence-based guidance, and operate a national data system that state and local health departments can contribute to and draw from in near real time. It should fund those partners to participate, because the CDC’s guidance reaches Americans through their local health departments. ## Pair independence with accountability Scientific independence invites scrutiny, and protecting the CDC from political interference makes meaningful accountability more important. Congress should establish public measures of performance. How effectively does the CDC identify and investigate emerging threats? How quickly does it get reliable information to states? How transparently does it evaluate evidence? How well does it communicate uncertainty and update recommendations as evidence changes? An independent body should evaluate these questions, accounting for outcomes that depend on state and local partners. The purpose is to find weaknesses and improve performance. With a Republican president in the White House, sweeping legislation will require bipartisan support. Congress can begin with oversight hearings, appropriations language, and independent investigations while it builds a coalition for lasting statutory protections. And they can start by pursuing common-sense, common-ground policies. For [eight decades](https://www.cdc.gov/museum/history/our-story.html), the CDC has protected Americans from infectious diseases and other health threats. Americans deserve a CDC whose science they can trust, whose expertise is protected, and whose ability to safeguard their health does not depend on who occupies the White House. [TIME Ideas](https://www.time.com/ideas) hosts the world's leading voices, providing commentary on events in news, society, and culture. We welcome outside contributions. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of TIME editors. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/11/14/congress-must-protect-the-cdc-from-politics/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/11/14/congress-must-protect-the-cdc-from-politics/"},"headline":"Congress Must Protect the CDC From Politics","datePublished":"2026-11-14T11:00:04.873Z","dateModified":"2026-11-14T11:00:14.288Z","description":"Americans deserve a CDC whose science they can trust, whose expertise is protected, and whose ability to safeguard their health does not depend on who occupies the White House, writes Nikki Romanik.","url":"https://time.com/article/2026/11/14/congress-must-protect-the-cdc-from-politics/","keywords":["health"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9bd2d4545ff72402/6af73e11e33957f7440b2015/cdc-congress-rfk-jr.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Nikki Romanik","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/dr-nikki-romanik/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9bd2d4545ff72402/6af73e11e33957f7440b2015/cdc-congress-rfk-jr.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"cdc-congress-rfk-jr.jpg","caption":"","creditText":"Alex Wroblewski—AFP via Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/tag/health/","name":"health"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/11/14/congress-must-protect-the-cdc-from-politics/","name":"Congress Must Protect the CDC From Politics"}}]}] ```