--- title: The Toxic Vengeance of Capital Punishment description: As states from California to Tennessee debate the death penalty, Dominic Erdozain argues that "a culture of vengeance tears at the fabric of democracy." canonical: https://time.com/article/2026/11/12/the-toxic-vengeance-of-capital-punishment/ author: Dominic Erdozain article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2026-11-12T15:50:50.311Z article:modified_time: 2026-11-12T15:51:02.065Z article:section: Ideas og:title: The Toxic Vengeance of Capital Punishment og:description: As states from California to Tennessee debate the death penalty, Dominic Erdozain argues that "a culture of vengeance tears at the fabric of democracy." og:url: https://time.com/article/2026/11/12/the-toxic-vengeance-of-capital-punishment/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltf306a0f322679aa4/6af3f8c363734cb536c9255d/Capital-Punishment.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2121 og:image:height: 1193 og:image:alt: Capital-Punishment.jpg og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: The Toxic Vengeance of Capital Punishment twitter:description: As states from California to Tennessee debate the death penalty, Dominic Erdozain argues that "a culture of vengeance tears at the fabric of democracy." twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltf306a0f322679aa4/6af3f8c363734cb536c9255d/Capital-Punishment.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  IDEAS Time ideas # The Toxic Vengeance of Capital Punishment > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=a5a8c83b-b077-4c18-a907-1f3e184dbe65&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=a5a8c83b-b077-4c18-a907-1f3e184dbe65&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=a5a8c83b-b077-4c18-a907-1f3e184dbe65&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=a5a8c83b-b077-4c18-a907-1f3e184dbe65&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1) by [Dominic Erdozain](https://time.com/author/dominic-erdozain/) ## Dominic Erdozain Dominic Erdozain is a historian and the author of "To Love a Country: The Problem of Patriotism in America." Nov 12, 2026 3:50 PM UTC  Max Zolotukhin—Getty Images by [Dominic Erdozain](https://time.com/author/dominic-erdozain/) ## Dominic Erdozain Dominic Erdozain is a historian and the author of "To Love a Country: The Problem of Patriotism in America." Nov 12, 2026 3:50 PM UTC Listen 00:001.0x09:01 Narrated by TIME AI. Two radical ideas have been introduced into human thought, wrote the novelist and humorist Kurt Vonnegut. One was that “energy and matter are pretty much the same sort of stuff.” That was Einstein. The other was that “revenge is a bad idea.” That was Jesus. We are so wired for vengeance, so trained to retaliate, mused Vonnegut, Jesus must be classed among the revolutionaries. Vonnegut was no Christian, preferring to describe himself as a “Christ-worshipping agnostic,” but he dreamed of a world in which the long “chain of death and destruction” is broken. That is why he opposed the death penalty and one of the reasons he despaired of America. News that the execution of former Army psychiatrist [Nidal Hasan](https://time.com/archive/6915489/fort-hood-were-hasans-warning-signs-ignored/), who murdered 13 U.S. soldiers in 2009, will [not be livestreamed](https://time.com/article/2026/10/15/trump-cancels-livestream-of-fort-hood-firing-squad-execution-amid-bipartisan-pushback/) in December has been well received, but [reports](https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/10/15/8-10-americans-oppose-live-streaming-execution-fort-hood-shooter-poll-shows/) that a narrow majority of Americans approve of both the sentence and the method of [death-by-firing-squad](https://time.com/article/2026/10/10/firing-squad-execution-lethal-injection-christa-pike-fort-hood-shooter/) have excited little comment. Coming days after the botched execution of [Christa Pike](https://time.com/article/2026/10/02/christa-pike-botched-execution-lethal-injection-tennessee-pentobarbital/) in Tennessee, for a crime committed when she was a teenager, it is reasonable to ask: Why do we still execute people? Pope Leo has [protested](https://www.vaticannews.va/en/pope/news/2026-10/pope-leo-xiv-tweet-death-penalty-inadmissible-dignity-person.html) the cruelty of a practice that denies “the possibility of redemption,” but this is a political as well as a religious question. A culture of vengeance tears at the fabric of democracy. About 20 years ago, the legal scholar Terry Aladjem staged a debate on the death penalty for an undergraduate class at the University of Massachusetts in Boston. Expecting to have to work hard to convince students of its merits, Aladjem was shocked to discover that nearly all of them were in favor of capital punishment. The “class erupted,” he recalled. “Those who supported the death penalty vastly outnumbered their opponents. America was not what I thought it was.” Aladjem went on to write a [book](https://terryaladjem.scholars.harvard.edu/publications/culture-vengeance-and-fate-american-democracy) about vengeance and how our appetite for violent punishment throws us back into a state of nature, fanning the dangerous passions that are supposed to be cooled and contained by the social contract. Vengeance was becoming the air we breathe, he observed. Talk shows, television justice, and politics seemed to be concerned with little else. Where liberal thought had banished the criterion of revenge from all considerations of justice, a politics of purity had brought it back. The result was “something absolutist, something profoundly undemocratic,” wrote Aladjem. The president who wants to hunt down terrorists, “[dead or alive](https://www.voanews.com/a/a-13-a-2001-09-17-37-bush-66422492/550110.html),” and the angry talk show host “who entertains the views of others only to reinforce his own” were peas in a pod. For Aladjem, the death penalty is at once deeply problematic on its own and a symptom of a wider malaise. He fears that the glee we might feel in the death of a “bad person” will come for us in the end. J. William Fulbright, the Senator for Arkansas and a longtime critic of the Vietnam War, made the same point in an [essay](https://digitalcollections.uark.edu/digital/collection/Fulbright/id/630/rec/46) on “The American Character” after the assassination of John F. Kennedy. Fulbright was appalled by the widespread expressions of sympathy for Jack Ruby, the man who shot Kennedy’s alleged assassin live on television, thus depriving Lee Harvey Oswald of one of the basic rights of a civilized society: “the right to a fair trial under established procedures of law.” This hunger for vengeance could not be dismissed as a normal feature of a healthy society. It spoke to an intolerance and bloodlust that was one part Salem, hanging witches on the strength of gossip, and one part frontier, hanging horse-thieves from trees. It was the Puritan spirit, immortalized in Arthur Miller’s play _The Crucible,_ that most troubled Fulbright. “Although no Western nation has completely dispelled the absolutist spirit of the crusades and the religious wars, some have been more successful than others,” he noted. The core of the democratic idea, going back to the critique of the divine right of kings, was “the element of doubt as to the ability of any man or any movement to perceive ultimate truth.” But “the Puritan way of thinking” injected an absolutist strand into American thought: a ferocious moralism eager to send sinners to hell. Fulbright’s essay recalls much of what the founders wrote about the danger of regression to a psychology of vengeance, and the notion that tyranny exists wherever violence is praised. Raised on an 18th-century version of the Puritanism that distressed Fulbright, Benjamin Rush had an epiphany one day in 1787, when he chatted with a group of convicts cleaning the streets in Philadelphia. With their shaven heads and degrading uniforms, the men made a sorry spectacle as they begged him for a penny. Offering them a draught of beer instead, Rush was stunned by their humor and humanity as he listened to their stories. The strange thought began to dawn that criminals were humans, after all, and that no heart is “wholly corrupted.” To terminate such a life, or confine it to perpetual misery, was a crime against human nature, Rush [wrote](https://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/amendVIIIs16.html). America had won its independence from Britain, but true freedom—freedom from cruelty and arbitrary violence—was still distant, as long as Americans persisted in brutal punishments. To shed blood with little or no emotion, to treat a criminal like a sheep or a dog, was to demonstrate how little we have understood about liberty as a principle of life and republicanism as its protection. “An execution in a republic,” he argued, “is like a human sacrifice in religion.” It was a return to a world that should have been left behind. Rush was not alone. Integral to early American patriotism was the notion of a rational people, liberated from the “bloody code” of medieval law. A critical influence on Rush, Jefferson, and several of their contemporaries was the Italian philosopher Cesare Beccaria, whose [_Essay on Crimes and Punishments_](https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/voltaire-an-essay-on-crimes-and-punishments)codified this notion of the death penalty as sanctified barbarism. It had taken centuries for societies to evolve from blood feuds and trial by combat to a system of tangible laws, in which the state serves as “the cool moderator of the passions of individuals.” When the state takes up the sword of vengeance, Beccaria suggests, it forgets its very purpose in life. It falls into the absurdity of trying to prevent murder by committing murder itself. No one could deny that malice and cruelty stalk the gallows. The solemnities of the ritual cannot hide the fact that we are trying to erase a terrible evil with more of the same. And no wonder it fails, observed the Italian. The effect is to cheapen human life and to breed contempt for the law—because it’s hard to love a government that acts in the spirit of “the assassin.” This was the idea that inspired Jefferson, as he set about reforming Virginia’s penal code, confining capital punishment to murder and treason, and drastically reducing the number of physical punishments on the books. “Let mercy be the character of the law-giver,” he [wrote](https://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/amendVIIIs9.html). But let the law be as certain as gravity. Jefferson denied that in disputing “the sanguinary hue of our penal laws” he was being soft on crime or naïvely optimistic about human nature. For laws to be effective, they had to be reasonable, proportionate, and mild. One of his models was William Penn, who showed that the “principles of peace, of reason and right” can hold their own in the realm of government. Although it’s unfortunate that he did not practice what he [preached](https://time.com/article/2026/07/03/healing-america-means-rethinking-patriotism/), Jefferson’s remarks on the corrosive effects of slavery reflected his notion that violence is a contagion and the law must limit its spread. “\[F\]or man is an imitative animal,” he [wrote](https://encyclopediavirginia.org/primary-documents/query-xviii-an-excerpt-from-notes-on-the-state-of-virginia-by-thomas-jefferson-1784/), and imitation is the seed of all education. When the child sees the parent lashing out, he “catches the lineaments of wrath.” Thus “nursed” and trained in tyranny, a tyrant is what he becomes. Advocates of the death penalty speak of justice, closure, and peace for the victims. But by Jefferson’s lights, a public execution is an education in brutality and a reopening of wounds. The legendary defense lawyer Clarence Darrow [argued](https://chicago.suntimes.com/2022/4/22/23032424/clarence-darrow-leopold-loeb-speech-closing-arguments) similarly that to punish murder with death is to “make less serious” the original offense. It is to baptize violence as the way of the world, and to say that what goes around comes around. Like Vonnegut, Darrow saw the death penalty as institutionalized vengeance, and he pleaded for an attitude of “mercy” to break the spell. “If our state is not kinder, more human, more considerate, more intelligent than the mad act of these two sick boys,” he said, as he attempted to spare two teenage killers a sentence of death in 1924, “then I’m sorry that I’ve lived so long.” But “I know the future is on my side.” Yet Darrow, believed to be the most brilliant and hard-headed attorney of his time, would be dismissed as a snowflake in ours. His language of clemency and kindness would likely be laughed at in an age when a Marine Corps veteran can [kill](https://time.com/6277268/jordan-neely-subway-death-homicide/) a homeless passenger on the New York subway and walk free of all charges—and even be lauded as a model of civic virtue. We all share the disease. President Bill Clinton’s decision to interrupt his presidential campaign to deny clemency for a brain-damaged black man on death row, in 1992, captures the true story of the past 30 years: convergence. “The real Bill Clinton is not for capital punishment,” [said](https://georgetowner.com/articles/2019/08/07/conversations-with-abner-mikva/) Illinois congressman Abner Mikva. He just thought it was “a political necessity.” Mikva saw the same dynamic playing out with handguns, lamenting a shift, in his lifetime, from serious talk of prohibition to the modern politician’s terror of uttering a word against the deadly weapons. What stems the tide? While Secretary of State Marco Rubio scolds [Europe](https://time.com/article/2026/10/29/how-europe-is-defying-trump-by-rallying-around-the-icc/) for building “downwards” and sacrificing the greatness of the Western tradition “[to the average, the ordinary, the mediocre](https://www.state.gov/releases/office-of-the-spokesman/2026/10/secretary-of-state-marco-rubio-remarks),” it is worth noting that every European nation except Belarus has abolished capital punishment, and that the nations with whom America shares the practice are those we have been taught to despise for their “[cult of death](https://www.state.gov/releases/office-of-the-spokesman/2026/10/secretary-of-state-marco-rubio-remarks).” We sit behind China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen among the countries with the [highest number](https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2026/05/death-penalty-in-2025-facts-and-figures/) of executions per annum. My hope is that more states will follow California’s lead in declaring state-sanctioned killing incompatible with “justice and human decency,” as Governor Gavin Newsom wrote last week, when he [commuted](https://www.gov.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/11/2026-11-5-26-GGN-Open-Letter-FINAL.pdf) the sentences of the state’s 548 death row inmates. Although some of the relatives of the victims expressed their fury at Newsom’s decision, one welcomed it in terms that would have pleased Benjamin Rush. “We used to think that having a vengeful death penalty sentence is going to be what gave us justice,” Jess Nichol, stepsister of Polly Klass, who was murdered in 1993, [told](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/11/05/us/california-death-row-newsom-commutation.html) _The New York Times_. “We’ve discovered that it doesn’t.” Having at first thought that the killer deserved death, Ms. Nichol came to believe that healing required a degree of mercy. “I want to live in a world where I am well, and not haunted by the hungry ghost of vengeance,” she said. This, I would argue, has to be the future. [TIME Ideas](https://www.time.com/ideas) hosts the world's leading voices, providing commentary on events in news, society, and culture. We welcome outside contributions. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of TIME editors. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/11/12/the-toxic-vengeance-of-capital-punishment/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/11/12/the-toxic-vengeance-of-capital-punishment/"},"headline":"The Toxic Vengeance of Capital Punishment","datePublished":"2026-11-12T15:50:50.311Z","dateModified":"2026-11-12T15:51:02.065Z","description":"As states from California to Tennessee debate the death penalty, Dominic Erdozain argues that \"a culture of vengeance tears at the fabric of democracy.\"","url":"https://time.com/article/2026/11/12/the-toxic-vengeance-of-capital-punishment/","keywords":["politics"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltf306a0f322679aa4/6af3f8c363734cb536c9255d/Capital-Punishment.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Dominic Erdozain","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/dominic-erdozain/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltf306a0f322679aa4/6af3f8c363734cb536c9255d/Capital-Punishment.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Capital-Punishment.jpg","caption":"","creditText":"Max Zolotukhin—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/tag/politics/","name":"politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/11/12/the-toxic-vengeance-of-capital-punishment/","name":"The Toxic Vengeance of Capital Punishment"}}]}] ```