--- title: Why NASA's Artemis III Mission Will Be One of its Most Complex Flights Ever description: A NASA press conference on Oct. 23 highlighted the challenges of the next Artemis mission expected to fly in 2027 that will test SpaceX and Blue Origin's rockets. canonical: https://time.com/article/2026/10/28/nasa-artemis-III-complex-mission/ author: Jeffrey Kluger article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2026-10-28T13:14:52.532Z article:modified_time: 2026-10-28T13:15:06.529Z article:section: Science og:title: Why NASA's Artemis III Mission Will Be One of its Most Complex Flights Ever og:description: A dress rehearsal for a moon landing will test the space agency's mettle. og:url: https://time.com/article/2026/10/28/nasa-artemis-III-complex-mission/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc31d8282e5de5ad4/6ae102fd12e9c0715f9e9060/MK2_EOR_ArtemisIII_Dock~orig.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 6330 og:image:height: 3561 og:image:alt: MK2_EOR_ArtemisIII_Dock~orig.jpg og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Why NASA's Artemis III Mission Will Be One of its Most Complex Flights Ever twitter:description: A dress rehearsal for a moon landing will test the space agency's mettle. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc31d8282e5de5ad4/6ae102fd12e9c0715f9e9060/MK2_EOR_ArtemisIII_Dock~orig.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Why NASA's Artemis III Mission Will Be One of its Most Complex Flights Ever > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Future Proof: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Future Proof is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. Making sense of the climate and energy economy. Future Proof examines the forces transforming energy and climate, and what those changes mean for business, technology, policy and the global economy. Senior correspondent Justin Worland goes beyond traditional climate coverage to connect the energy transition to the bigger decisions reshaping companies, markets and society. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-futureproof-2026q3/newsletters?i=b6483448-164b-4095-8193-c5332edc2d32&cr=time-nl-futureproof-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Friday (1x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Justin Worland, Senior Correspondent | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Senior leaders shaping the climate transition. An engaged audience of executives and decision-makers spanning operating companies, finance, policy, consulting, communications and media. ### TIME Future Proof: key statements * Future Proof is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Future Proof is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-futureproof-2026q3/newsletters?i=b6483448-164b-4095-8193-c5332edc2d32&cr=time-nl-futureproof-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-futureproof-2026q3/subscribe?i=b6483448-164b-4095-8193-c5332edc2d32&cr=time-nl-futureproof-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is TIME's climate and energy newsletter? Future Proof is TIME's weekly climate and energy newsletter, written by senior correspondent Justin Worland. It connects the energy transition to the decisions reshaping business, technology, policy and markets. #### Where can I follow the energy transition as a business story? Future Proof covers climate and energy as an economic and business story rather than only an environmental one. It publishes every Friday and is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who writes Future Proof? Justin Worland, a senior correspondent at TIME and an award-winning climate journalist, writes Future Proof. #### Is Future Proof free? Yes. Future Proof is free at time.com/newsletters. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-futureproof-2026q3/newsletters?i=b6483448-164b-4095-8193-c5332edc2d32&cr=time-nl-futureproof-2026q3-v1)  by [Jeffrey Kluger](https://time.com/author/jeffrey-kluger/)  ## Jeffrey Kluger Editor at Large Oct 28, 2026 1:14 PM UTC  Artist's conception of the Blue Moon lander rendezvousing with Orion. Artist's conception of the Blue Moon lander rendezvousing with Orion. NASA  by [Jeffrey Kluger](https://time.com/author/jeffrey-kluger/)  ## Jeffrey Kluger Editor at Large Oct 28, 2026 1:14 PM UTC Listen 00:001.0x07:06 Narrated by TIME AI. The last time the folks at NASA tested a crewed lunar lander in low-Earth orbit, here’s how they did it. First, a Saturn 5 rocket lifted off from the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) in Florida carrying three astronauts, an Apollo spacecraft, and a lunar module. Then they got to orbit and the astronauts flew both ships. Then they came home. That straightforward mission was accomplished 57 years ago, during the flight of [Apollo 9](https://www.nasa.gov/mission/apollo-9/). The next time NASA attempts something of the kind—during the planned flight of [Artemis III](https://www.nasa.gov/mission/artemis-iii/) in the summer of 2027—things will be a lot more complicated. First an uncrewed Blue Origin [New Glenn rocket](https://time.com/article/2026/05/29/blue-origin-rocket-explosion-nasa-moon/) will launch from KSC carrying the company’s [Blue Moon lander](https://www.blueorigin.com/blue-moon) into orbit. Then NASA will launch its prosaically named [Space Launch System](https://time.com/6208598/nasa-moon-rocket-artemis-sls/) (SLS) moon rocket, carrying the four Artemis III astronauts aboard an [Orion spacecraft](https://www.nasa.gov/humans-in-space/orion-spacecraft/). Then the crew will rendezvous with the Blue Moon, dock with it and enter it, checking out its systems before returning to the Orion. Then SpaceX will launch a [Starship rocket ](https://time.com/article/2026/09/28/spacex-starship-orbit-what-to-know/)carrying its own Starship lander, which will also be uncrewed. The astronauts will rendezvous and dock with that ship too, but not enter it since it will not yet be equipped with a life support system. Then they will separate and the crew will spend a few more days running tests on the Orion. All of that work will take up to 17 days from first liftoff to splashdown. And only if everything goes just right with that mission can NASA achieve its goal of landing astronauts on the lunar surface during the 2028 flight of Artemis IV—and in the process, win a new space race with China. On Oct. 23, NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman—along with Associate Administrator Amit Kshatriya and Artemis Program Manager Jeremy Parsons—conducted a marathon two-hour press conference at KSC, detailing plans for Artemis III and IV, conceding that the hurdles are considerable, but insisting the goals are within reach. The current NASA, with its tight funding and long timelines, may not be the old NASA that used its generous budgets and garage full of rockets to pop off nine crewed Apollo lunar missions just from 1968 to 1972, but it will be no less successful. “In that remarkably short span of time, the ambitions of generations once confined to the pages of science fiction became humanity's greatest achievement, and for the first time in billions of years, life born on Earth would set foot on another world,” said Isaacman. “Now, in this incredibly demanding and dangerous business of putting astronauts \[back\] on the moon, NASA must own the near impossible…That is how we give Artemis IV the greatest possible chance of safely and successfully returning Americans to the lunar surface in 2028.” The extreme complexity of Artemis III is owing in part to a pair of decisions NASA made in 2021 and 2023 and in part to the simple limits of known rocket technology. If the engineering physics were perfect—and engineering physics are never perfect—a lunar crew could use just one spacecraft to get to the moon, land, blast back off, and return home. But a spacecraft that could do all of those jobs and remain robust enough to reenter the Earth’s atmosphere would simply be too heavy for a lunar landing and subsequent liftoff. Instead, as in the Apollo days, the job will be divided between two ships—one lightweight one to perform the landing and liftoff and one orbiting mothership to bring the crew home when the lunar exploration is done. During Apollo, [the space agency selected Grumman Aircraft Engineering](https://www.zdnet.com/article/to-the-moon-grumman-the-company-that-built-apollo-11s-lunar-module/) to build its squat, four-legged 23-ft. tall, lunar module (LM). It was a simple ship with a low center of gravity, ensuring a stable foothold on the lunar surface. Grumman inked the contract in 1962 and delivered the goods in time for Apollo 9 and the missions that followed. [In 2021](https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/as-artemis-moves-forward-nasa-picks-spacex-to-land-next-americans-on-moon/), NASA similarly awarded a contract for a crewed lunar spacecraft—this time to SpaceX and its Starship lander. The decision was a headscratcher. Starship is a silo-like cylinder with a tapered nose cone, measuring 165 ft. tall, calling to mind less an actual spacecraft than the 1953[ illustrated book](https://www.tintin.com/en/albums/destination-moon) about Tintin’s adventures on the moon. Apollo astronauts used a[ nine-rung ladder](https://www.fastcompany.com/90358794/the-design-decision-that-would-have-ruined-the-moon-landing) to get down to the lunar surface. Artemis astronauts aboard Starship[ will use an elevator](https://www.nasa.gov/image-article/nasa-astronauts-test-spacex-elevator-concept-for-artemis-lunar-lander/). Critics and competitors [pounced on the plan](https://spacepolicyonline.com/news/nasa-ig-applauds-nasa-contracting-for-artemis-hls-raises-concerns-about-crew-safety/)—not least because of the risk that the giant machine could tip over on the moon—and in 2023, NASA issued a second contract, this time to Blue Origin, which promised to build a lander more in keeping with the low-slung Apollo lunar module. Both companies have continued to produce their landers and both will get a shot to fly on the historic Artemis IV mission—with the winner to be determined by the performance of the ships during Artemis III. But neither company has had an easy go of things. SpaceX has launched 14 Starships since 2023, only [achieving Earth orbit for the first time](https://earthsky.org/spaceflight/spacex-starship-reaches-earths-orbit-for-1st-time/) in September 2026\. Blue Origin’s New Glenn rocket, meanwhile, [launched three times](https://spaceflightnow.com/2026/04/20/blue-origin-launches-third-new-glenn-rocket-but-payload-ends-up-in-wrong-orbit/) from January 2025 to April 2026, before a [massive explosion on the launch pad](https://time.com/article/2026/05/29/blue-origin-rocket-explosion-nasa-moon/) during a test of its first stage engines occurred in May 2026\. The disaster marked a major setback for Blue Origin, not least because the pad infrastructure itself was partially destroyed in the blast. The company has been working feverishly since to rebound, and at the Oct. 23 press conference, the NASA brass praised its efforts. “Blue Origin's New Glenn team has amazed the world with their progress for return to flight after the incident in May,” said Parsons. “We're working closely with them. We have over 100 NASA team \[members\] engaged throughout return to flight…and I have seen Blue Origin mobilize an absolute army working around the clock.” Assuming the company can maintain that pace, it stands a good chance of being the winner in the Artemis III sweepstakes. That’s partly because its rival, SpaceX, will not fly a full-up version of its Starship lander during the mission, but rather [what amounts to a boilerplate ship](https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/esdmd/artemis-campaign-development-division/human-landing-system-program/how-nasas-artemis-iii-lander-test-will-pave-way-for-moon-landings/) equipped with a docking port that will test only whether the Orion and the Starship can meet and link up in orbit. Blue Origin’s Blue Moon lander won’t be a fully operational vehicle either, but it will have a functioning crew compartment that will allow the Artemis III astronauts to enter and run tests. “They're going to open up the hatch. They're going to enter the lander. They're going to evaluate the environmental controls, the life support systems,” says Parsons. “We'll confirm that the spacecraft can maintain the right atmospheric pressure, and we're also going to test emergency scenarios, dual vehicle control, and we're going to put our Mission Control teams through their paces." For all of the confidence expressed at the press conference, no one at NASA pretends that the Artemis III mission doesn’t have a lot of moving parts and a lot of things that could go badly wrong before the space agency can tee up the 2028 Artemis IV landing. And even if the mission does completely succeed, NASA will still require both competing spacecraft to execute an uncrewed lunar landing and liftoff to prove their mettle further. Only then will the landers be certified to carry crew. Whether the two companies can perfect the engineering and fly the uncrewed missions in the maximum 18 months that will elapse between the launch of Artemis III and the flight of Artemis IV at the end of 2028 is uncertain. Isaacman, for one, expresses confidence that the target date can be met without slipping into 2029 or later. But he acknowledges that NASA’s years of uncertainty since the Apollo program—with priorities shifting from Skylab to the shuttle to the International Space Station, and with start-stop programs to return to the moon that burned through money but never got anywhere—have set the agency back, especially as it concerns the ongoing competition with China. “Here we are today, very much in a new space race, and despite decades of accumulated knowledge and extraordinary advancements in technology, this race will be much closer than it ever needed to be,” he says. “That brings us to the moment we find ourselves in today, because the appetite for tolerating and defending the status quo has reached its conclusion. We are here for the mission, and to deliver the outcomes the world expects of the most accomplished space agency in history.” ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/10/28/nasa-artemis-III-complex-mission/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/10/28/nasa-artemis-III-complex-mission/"},"headline":"Why NASA's Artemis III Mission Will Be One of its Most Complex Flights Ever","datePublished":"2026-10-28T13:14:52.532Z","dateModified":"2026-10-28T13:15:06.529Z","description":"A dress rehearsal for a moon landing will test the space agency's mettle.","url":"https://time.com/article/2026/10/28/nasa-artemis-III-complex-mission/","keywords":["Space"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc31d8282e5de5ad4/6ae102fd12e9c0715f9e9060/MK2_EOR_ArtemisIII_Dock~orig.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Jeffrey Kluger","jobTitle":"Editor at Large","url":"https://time.com/author/jeffrey-kluger/"}],"articleSection":"Science","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc31d8282e5de5ad4/6ae102fd12e9c0715f9e9060/MK2_EOR_ArtemisIII_Dock~orig.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"MK2_EOR_ArtemisIII_Dock~orig.jpg","caption":"","creditText":"NASA","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/science/","name":"Science"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/space/","name":"Space"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/10/28/nasa-artemis-III-complex-mission/","name":"Why NASA's Artemis III Mission Will Be One of its Most Complex Flights Ever"}}]}] ```