--- title: Our Brains Weren’t Built for This Much Comparison description: The scale, frequency, quantification, and accessibility of social comparison have all changed, writes Dr. Ashwini Nadkarni. canonical: https://time.com/article/2026/10/24/our-brains-weren-t-built-for-this-much-comparison/ author: Ashwini Nadkarni article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2026-10-24T10:00:03.047Z article:modified_time: 2026-10-24T10:00:12.818Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Our Brains Weren’t Built for This Much Comparison og:description: The scale, frequency, quantification, and accessibility of social comparison have all changed, writes Dr. Ashwini Nadkarni. og:url: https://time.com/article/2026/10/24/our-brains-weren-t-built-for-this-much-comparison/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9784ce11a46f1c87/6ababac8e8ddf8844d3789b7/brain-social-media.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2121 og:image:height: 1193 og:image:alt: brain-social-media.jpg og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Our Brains Weren’t Built for This Much Comparison twitter:description: The scale, frequency, quantification, and accessibility of social comparison have all changed, writes Dr. Ashwini Nadkarni. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9784ce11a46f1c87/6ababac8e8ddf8844d3789b7/brain-social-media.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  IDEAS Time ideas # Our Brains Weren’t Built for This Much Comparison > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=e31be087-0985-4b3e-b482-c1686bdb025e&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=e31be087-0985-4b3e-b482-c1686bdb025e&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=e31be087-0985-4b3e-b482-c1686bdb025e&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=e31be087-0985-4b3e-b482-c1686bdb025e&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1) by [Ashwini Nadkarni](https://time.com/author/ashwini-nadkarni/) ## Ashwini Nadkarni Dr. Ashwini Nadkarni is assistant professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School and Vice Chair of Faculty Enrichment at Mass General Brigham Psychiatry. Oct 24, 2026 10:00 AM UTC  Deagreez—Getty Images by [Ashwini Nadkarni](https://time.com/author/ashwini-nadkarni/) ## Ashwini Nadkarni Dr. Ashwini Nadkarni is assistant professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School and Vice Chair of Faculty Enrichment at Mass General Brigham Psychiatry. Oct 24, 2026 10:00 AM UTC Listen 00:001.0x03:48 Narrated by TIME AI. More than 20? Or less than 75? As I scan my feedback on a recent social media post, my brain just can’t seem to help registering the number of “likes.” I’m not alone. Under a recent settlement that Meta recently reached with states, Facebook and Instagram are about to look different for minors Among the new protections, one seemingly modest change caught my eye. By default, [users under 18](https://time.com/article/2026/08/27/meta-settlement-facebook-instagram-child-safety/) will no longer be able to see likes and other reactions in response to their posts or those of others. The reforms are [designed for children](https://time.com/article/2026/06/16/why-fines-alone-won-t-make-social-media-safer-for-kids/) and teenagers, but touch on a psychological phenomenon just as relevant to adults. As a psychiatrist, I found myself wondering: Why does that little number beneath your post matter so much? The answer has less to do with social media and more to do with an ancient human tendency: social comparison.[ Social comparison](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/001872675400700202) is the psychological process by which people assess themselves, including their own abilities, opinions, and achievements, in relation to those of others. Likes can both reward us and rank us. They show us that people are validating our posts and also quantify that validation. We know how much approval we receive relative to what we might have expected, what we got the last time we posted, and what others receive. Feedback is scored. Likes are just one example. Follower counts, views, and shares are other metrics that make social information measurable. When social approval is numerically valued, comparison becomes harder to avoid. From an evolutionary perspective, social comparison may have served an adaptive purpose. Humans evolved in social groups. Knowing where you stood relative to others might have helped you identify what behaviors were approved, whether you belonged, and how to navigate hierarchy. But moving beyond prehistoric time to the last century, comparison still had constraints. Your 25-year high school reunion? It happened once in your lifetime, maybe in a city far away from you, with only your fellow classmates in attendance. Now, the high school reunion lives in the device in our hands, capable of giving anyone quantitative signals from a vast reference group at any moment on our personalized scoreboards of social approval. If the subjective question is whether we belong, what can feel like an objective answer is the 100 likes our post gets from 2,500 followers. The scale, frequency, quantification, and accessibility of social comparison have all changed. Our brains weren’t built for this much comparison.[ Neuroimaging studies](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/hbm.23854) show that our brains allocate value to how we believe we stack up next to others. Downward social comparison, in which we learn someone performs worse than us, can engage neural circuits associated with reward and valuation. Upward comparison, in which we learn someone performs better than us, can engage neural circuits associated with processing unpleasant emotions. These are ways in which our brains process social outcomes much like other kinds of gains or losses. But our brains don’t just register numbers; we also tend to evaluate their meaning. In one[ study](https://www.bio.psy.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/bpsy/mam/content/papers/2019%5Frosenthal-von%5Fder%5Fpuetten.pdf), likes functioned as a type of currency that adult users compared themselves on, shaping how they felt in that moment. In another[ set of studies](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32790470/), adults who made more frequent and extreme upward comparisons reported an immediate decline in self-evaluation and cumulative declines in self-esteem and life satisfaction over a browsing session.[ Research](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-40371-3) has also found that across generational groups, greater user tendency to engage in social comparison, together with greater maladaptive ways of coping with [emotions](https://time.com/article/2026/08/11/emotional-granularity-name-feelings/), is associated with more symptoms of anger, anxiety, and depression. Social comparison isn’t inherently harmful. But as repeated opportunities to compare mount, the [mental health effects](https://time.com/6100182/instagram-generation-z-mental-health/) can [add up](https://time.com/4793331/instagram-social-media-mental-health/). While hiding likes may not eliminate social comparison, it does remove a metric from the scoreboard. The instinct to compare or desire to belong won’t just vanish. But even if we might wonder where we stand next to who’s performing better, there’s a difference between wondering and a number answering that question for us. Social media didn’t invent our instinct to compare ourselves to others. We’ve had that for millennia. What it did was shift the environment surrounding our instincts, encoding one form of social feedback into numbers we can monitor. That's why changing our relationship with social comparison will mean more than adapting digital platforms. What do we value? What gives us purpose? What makes our lives matter? The cultural shift that lies ahead is to ask the questions about our social worth that don’t need a scoreboard to answer. [TIME Ideas](https://www.time.com/ideas) hosts the world's leading voices, providing commentary on events in news, society, and culture. We welcome outside contributions. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of TIME editors. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/10/24/our-brains-weren-t-built-for-this-much-comparison/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/10/24/our-brains-weren-t-built-for-this-much-comparison/"},"headline":"Our Brains Weren’t Built for This Much Comparison","datePublished":"2026-10-24T10:00:03.047Z","dateModified":"2026-10-24T10:00:12.818Z","description":"The scale, frequency, quantification, and accessibility of social comparison have all changed, writes Dr. Ashwini Nadkarni.","url":"https://time.com/article/2026/10/24/our-brains-weren-t-built-for-this-much-comparison/","keywords":["health","tech"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9784ce11a46f1c87/6ababac8e8ddf8844d3789b7/brain-social-media.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Ashwini Nadkarni","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/ashwini-nadkarni/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9784ce11a46f1c87/6ababac8e8ddf8844d3789b7/brain-social-media.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"brain-social-media.jpg","caption":"","creditText":"Deagreez—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/health/","name":"health"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/10/24/our-brains-weren-t-built-for-this-much-comparison/","name":"Our Brains Weren’t Built for This Much Comparison"}}]}] ```