--- title: Billionaires Are the Symptom, Not the Disease description: Wealth taxes are justified and overdue, but until we confront corporate power directly, wealth will continue concentrating in the same few hands, argues Christopher Marquis. canonical: https://time.com/article/2026/10/16/billionaires-are-the-symptom-not-the-disease/ author: Christopher Marquis article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2026-10-16T11:00:03.961Z article:modified_time: 2026-10-16T11:00:04.106Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Billionaires Are the Symptom, Not the Disease og:description: Wealth taxes are justified and overdue, but until we confront corporate power directly, wealth will continue concentrating in the same few hands, argues Christopher Marquis. og:url: https://time.com/article/2026/10/16/billionaires-are-the-symptom-not-the-disease/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt23a011b1e85ecbfc/6ad1bfca028d9f53c84a77ab/Billionaires-Are-Symptom.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1936 og:image:height: 1089 og:image:alt: Billionaires-Are-Symptom.jpg og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Billionaires Are the Symptom, Not the Disease twitter:description: Wealth taxes are justified and overdue, but until we confront corporate power directly, wealth will continue concentrating in the same few hands, argues Christopher Marquis. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt23a011b1e85ecbfc/6ad1bfca028d9f53c84a77ab/Billionaires-Are-Symptom.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  IDEAS Time ideas # Billionaires Are the Symptom, Not the Disease > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=bfa9f790-570b-406b-8e19-c3752f6ef433&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=bfa9f790-570b-406b-8e19-c3752f6ef433&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=bfa9f790-570b-406b-8e19-c3752f6ef433&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=bfa9f790-570b-406b-8e19-c3752f6ef433&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1) by [Christopher Marquis](https://time.com/author/christopher-marquis/) ## Christopher Marquis Christopher Marquis is a professor at the University of Cambridge and the author of "The Profiteers." Oct 16, 2026 11:00 AM UTC  CSA Images—Getty Images by [Christopher Marquis](https://time.com/author/christopher-marquis/) ## Christopher Marquis Christopher Marquis is a professor at the University of Cambridge and the author of "The Profiteers." Oct 16, 2026 11:00 AM UTC After nearly a century, America has rediscovered the wealth tax. This November, Californians will vote on [Proposition 40](https://calmatters.org/california-voter-guide-2026/proposition-40-billionaire-tax/), a union-backed initiative levying a one-time 5% tax on the net worth of the state's billionaires. Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Ro Khanna have introduced [a federal version](https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-and-khanna-introduce-legislation-to-tax-billionaire-wealth-and-invest-in-working-families/); a [dozen](https://stateline.org/2026/04/29/millionaire-taxes-gain-steam-as-states-face-budget-crunches/) states have advanced millionaire or billionaire taxes this year; and [Maine, Washington, Hawaii, and Rhode Island](https://itep.org/2026-state-legislative-sessions-tax-the-rich/) have all enacted one. Not since the Progressive Era has taxing the rich had this much momentum. The energy is easy to understand. The 25 wealthiest Americans pay a “true tax rate” of just [3.4%](https://www.propublica.org/article/the-secret-irs-files-trove-of-never-before-seen-records-reveal-how-the-wealthiest-avoid-income-tax)—a fraction of what nurses and teachers pay—while holding about 2% of the nation's wealth. That’s [nearly as much](https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/dataviz/dfa/distribute/chart/) as the entire bottom half of the country combined. This spring, Forbes counted a [record 3,428 billionaires](https://www.forbes.com/billionaires/) worth $20.1 trillion, up $4 trillion since last year. Elon Musk topped the list at $839 billion, and this summer he [became](https://time.com/7333033/elon-musk-trillionaires-democracy-campaign-finance-wealth-gap/) history's first [trillionaire](https://time.com/video/cEGpsW9n/). At the same time, workers' share of economic output fell to [52.8%](https://www.bls.gov/news.release/prod2.nr0.htm), the lowest since records began in 1947\. Today, billionaire wealth is at an all-time high while labor's share is at an all-time low. One obvious response is to tax the fortunes at the top and redistribute those funds. But I worry that the wealth-tax movement is aimed at the wrong target. Billionaires create a lot of damage, to be sure. As Alex Gibney’s new documentary [_Musk_](https://bleeckerstreetmedia.com/musk) lays out, the Tesla and SpaceX CEO spent [nearly $300 million](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/01/31/elon-musk-trump-donor-2024-election/) helping elect a president and then [slashed federal agencies](https://time.com/7213409/elon-musk-us-government-trump/), including several [investigating](https://www.epi.org/blog/corruption-in-plain-sight-how-elon-musk-has-benefited-from-the-first-100-days-of-the-trump-administration/) his own companies. Still, he and his tech-bro pals are not themselves the underlying reason for our economic dysfunction. In my view, the root cause is corporate power—the way modern corporations are owned, governed, and permitted to organize markets and politics to their own advantage—and how relentlessly that power has concentrated over the past 50 years. The evidence is everywhere. Since the late 1990s, [three-quarters](https://academic.oup.com/rof/article/23/4/697/5476402) of American industries have grown more concentrated. Corporate margins have roughly tripled since 1980, and after-tax profits—below 10% of GDP for virtually all of 1950 to 2010—[now exceed 12%](https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/article/corporate-profits-were-already-at-historic-highs-they-shot-even-higher-in-q1-180022338.html), near the record. Economist Thomas Philippon [calculates](https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/nov/13/america-was-once-the-land-of-free-markets-now-theyre-becoming-a-myth) that weakened competition costs the typical household about $300 a month. Since 1970, when Milton Friedman [declared](https://www.nytimes.com/1970/09/13/archives/a-friedman-doctrine-the-social-responsibility-of-business-is-to.html) that a corporation's only social responsibility is profit, businesses have been re-engineered around delivering the most value possible to shareholders. Today, the bulk of many senior executives’ pay comes in the form of stock options and share buybacks (when a company spends its earnings to buy up its own stock and lift the price), which now send [over a trillion dollars a year](https://www.wsj.com/finance/stocks/stock-buybacks-2025-3b0ddedd) to shareholders rather than into wages or investment. Before [1982](https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/blog/to-boost-investment-end-sec-rule-encouraging-buybacks), this practice was viewed as market manipulation. In the following decades, the forces that once pushed back against inequality were gutted: [union membership](https://www.bls.gov/news.release/union2.nr0.htm) fell from 20% of American workers to 10%, and antitrust enforcement was consistently muted. This is where billionaires come in. Nobody _earns_ $839 billion from a paycheck. A fortune of that scale can only be made by accumulating equity. That is, gains from corporate profits. Profit is simply what remains after wages are held down, taxes are minimized, and costs are pushed onto workers, communities, and the environment. It makes little difference whether the claim to those profits comes from founding a company or, as with hedge-fund and private-equity fortunes, from the fruit of corporations other people built. Because the richest tenth of Americans own [nearly 90%](https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/dataviz/dfa/distribute/chart/) of household stock-market wealth, every dollar shifted from paychecks to profit flows almost undiluted to the top. You don't have to look hard for examples. The Walton fortune rests on wages so low that [a federal watchdog](https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-21-45) found Walmart among the biggest employers of workers on Medicaid and food stamps. In other words, taxpayers are subsidizing the payroll beneath a dynastic fortune. Amazon founder and CEO Jeff Bezos's wealth compounded over years during which Amazon [paid no federal income tax](https://itep.org/amazon-in-its-prime-doubles-profits-pays-0-in-federal-income-taxes/) on billions in profit while fighting its warehouse workers' union drives. In each case, the fortune is substantially extracted from workers and the public, not the market reward it is billed as. None of this would last without help from Washington. Over the past half century, political spending has become a core business strategy and arguably the highest-return investment a large company can make. In a [1971 memorandum](https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/powellmemo/), future Supreme Court justice Lewis Powell urged the Chamber of Commerce to put business on a political war footing. Today, lobbying has grown into a [multibillion-dollar](https://about.bgov.com/insights/company-news/bloomberg-government-annual-top-lobbying-firms-report-reveals-5-3-billion-industry-spending-in-2025/) industry and business now outspends labor and public-interest groups [34-to-one](https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/04/how-corporate-lobbyists-conquered-american-democracy/390822/). Since [Citizens United](https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/citizens-united-explained) removed the last meaningful limits on business political spending in 2010, every election has cost more than the last—[nearly $16 billion in 2024](https://www.opensecrets.org/elections-overview/cost-of-election), mostly corporate money. Under President Donald Trump, the exchange has become impossible to ignore. Corporations lined up with seven-figure donations to his inaugural fund; oil executives, who were asked point-blank for [$1 billion at a Mar-a-Lago dinner](https://oversightdemocrats.house.gov/news/press-releases/new-bicameral-letters-democrats-demand-big-oil-executives-comply-investigation), have watched climate rules fall ever since; Paramount [paid $16 million](https://www.npr.org/2025/07/02/nx-s1-5290171/trump-lawsuit-paramount-cbs-60-minutes-kamala-harris) to settle a lawsuit legal experts dismissed while its merger awaited federal approval; and the crypto industry, having spent [more than $130 million](https://www.factcheck.org/2026/08/fairshake-2/) on the 2024 races, saw the [enforcement cases against it evaporate](https://www.bostonglobe.com/2025/12/14/business/sec-was-tough-crypto-it-pulled-back-after-trump-returned-office/), and this fall is [spending hundreds of millions](https://electionlawblog.org/2026/republican-megadonors-dominate-2026-midterm-election-as-crypto-and-ai-money-surges-cnbc-analysis-finds/) on 2026 midterm races. This is why a politics aimed only at billionaires will miss the mark. I support wealth taxes, and I hope Proposition 40 passes. Yet wealth taxes only claw back winnings after the fact. This year's Forbes’ Billionaires list added 390 [newcomers](https://www.forbes.com/sites/kirkogunrinde/2026/03/10/new-billionaires-2026-beyonc-james-cameron-dr-dre-and-387-others-join-the-ranks-this-year/). Taxing Musk, Bezos, and other billionaires does not touch the executives, boards, investment funds, and political machines that keep minting new ones. What would it mean to take aim at the root cause of inequality instead? First, we must recognize that the shareholder-primacy firm is a policy choice—the product of lobbying and lawmaking since the 1970s—and policy choices can be remade by rebuilding labor power through labor-law reform and sectoral bargaining, reviving antitrust, and getting corporate money out of politics. Early American corporate charters, after all, were granted for limited public purposes and could be revoked when abused. It also means redesigning ownership itself. In my [research](https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/christopher-marquis/the-profiteers/9781541703520/) on alternative corporate models, I have studied companies that are deliberately structured so that no one can extract a dynastic fortune, because the equity is legally locked to purpose. When Patagonia's founder moved the company into a [purpose trust](https://www.patagonia.com/ownership/) in 2022, such extraction became impossible by design; Bosch has been majority-owned by a foundation for decades and competes ferociously. Steward ownership, employee ownership, and benefit corporations are working alternatives operating in thousands of companies around the world and address wealth concentration at its source. The wealth-tax debate, in other words, is about how to redistribute the gains that came from corporate power. But we need to redistribute corporate power itself. None of this argues against Proposition 40 or its state and federal counterparts. Vote for them, pass them, let the revenue fund healthcare and schools. It is an argument about where attention needs to be focused next. History tells us that previous American confrontations with concentrated wealth, from Progressive Era trustbusters to the New Deal, succeeded not merely by taxing the winners but by restructuring corporate power through antitrust enforcement, securities regulation, and protecting labor rights. The real question facing America is whether corporations exist to serve society, or society exists to serve corporations. A politics that stops at the wealth tax has already conceded the answer. [TIME Ideas](https://www.time.com/ideas) hosts the world's leading voices, providing commentary on events in news, society, and culture. We welcome outside contributions. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of TIME editors. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/10/16/billionaires-are-the-symptom-not-the-disease/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/10/16/billionaires-are-the-symptom-not-the-disease/"},"headline":"Billionaires Are the Symptom, Not the Disease","datePublished":"2026-10-16T11:00:03.961Z","dateModified":"2026-10-16T11:00:04.106Z","description":"Wealth taxes are justified and overdue, but until we confront corporate power directly, wealth will continue concentrating in the same few hands, argues Christopher Marquis.","url":"https://time.com/article/2026/10/16/billionaires-are-the-symptom-not-the-disease/","keywords":["Economy"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt23a011b1e85ecbfc/6ad1bfca028d9f53c84a77ab/Billionaires-Are-Symptom.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Christopher Marquis","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/christopher-marquis/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt23a011b1e85ecbfc/6ad1bfca028d9f53c84a77ab/Billionaires-Are-Symptom.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Billionaires-Are-Symptom.jpg","caption":"","creditText":"CSA Images—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/economy/","name":"Economy"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/10/16/billionaires-are-the-symptom-not-the-disease/","name":"Billionaires Are the Symptom, Not the Disease"}}]}] ```