--- title: Why We Must Invest in Scientists, Not Just Science description: “It is through patient, painstaking work, driven by curiosity and pursued through personal dedication and sacrifice, that scientific advancement occurs,” writes Nicholas B. Dirks. canonical: https://time.com/article/2026/10/10/why-we-must-invest-in-scientists-not-just-science/ author: Nicholas B. Dirks article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2026-10-09T09:00:04.596Z article:modified_time: 2026-10-09T09:00:05.499Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Why We Must Invest in Scientists, Not Just Science og:description: “It is through patient, painstaking work, driven by curiosity and pursued through personal dedication and sacrifice, that scientific advancement occurs,” writes Nicholas B. Dirks. og:url: https://time.com/article/2026/10/10/why-we-must-invest-in-scientists-not-just-science/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9d5baa214a2906f4/6ac859fde835f2109d781d41/Fund-Scientists.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1942 og:image:height: 1092 og:image:alt: Fund-Scientists.jpg og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Why We Must Invest in Scientists, Not Just Science twitter:description: “It is through patient, painstaking work, driven by curiosity and pursued through personal dedication and sacrifice, that scientific advancement occurs,” writes Nicholas B. Dirks. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9d5baa214a2906f4/6ac859fde835f2109d781d41/Fund-Scientists.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  IDEAS Time ideas # Why We Must Invest in Scientists, Not Just Science > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=470d75cd-2031-4c2d-a8e1-24c7ca6a87a1&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=470d75cd-2031-4c2d-a8e1-24c7ca6a87a1&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=470d75cd-2031-4c2d-a8e1-24c7ca6a87a1&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=470d75cd-2031-4c2d-a8e1-24c7ca6a87a1&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1) by [Nicholas B. Dirks](https://time.com/author/nicholas-dirks/) ## Nicholas B. Dirks Nicholas B. Dirks is the president and CEO of the New York Academy of Sciences. Oct 9, 2026 9:00 AM UTC  Westend61—Getty Images by [Nicholas B. Dirks](https://time.com/author/nicholas-dirks/) ## Nicholas B. Dirks Nicholas B. Dirks is the president and CEO of the New York Academy of Sciences. Oct 9, 2026 9:00 AM UTC We often think of science as a search for answers to a specific issue: a solution to a known problem, or a cure for a particular disease. In practice, scientific discovery is typically more chaotic and uncertain, full of false starts and contradictions. That is why so many of the major scientific breakthroughs in human history have been born out of hunches, the product of imagination or serendipity, coupled with the brilliance and curiosity of a scientist to recognize the significance of a discovery. For instance, [graphene](https://time.com/3964302/miracle-material-graphene-graphite/) was born out of tangential research at the University of Manchester and is now used in everything from medical equipment and electronics to batteries and tennis racquets. Scientific research invariably raises new questions. What begins as a narrow inquiry opens dozens of new avenues of investigation, each capable of taking the research in an entirely new direction. The pursuit of science is, at its core, less a journey towards a destination than an evolving exercise in enlightened exploration. It is through patient, painstaking work, driven by curiosity and pursued through personal dedication and sacrifice, that scientific advancement occurs. Yet, too often, our tendency as a society is to celebrate the tangible breakthroughs and neglect the assiduous process that made them possible. The Nobel prizes are a magnificent celebration of transformative science. But by design, most are awarded decades after the breakthrough discovery being recognized was first made. Scientists, however, are typically most creative and productive early in their careers but fail to receive the financial support essential to reaching their full potential. This quandary is replicated many times over within the wider world of institutional funding. Public bodies and universities must decide which projects to back before they know where those ideas will lead. And with many talented scientists competing for finite resources, much promising research is lost. I would argue that this challenge, therefore, is felt most acutely by early-career scientists. The pressure on them is not simply to demonstrate scientific progress, but to produce the kind of science that can be articulated succinctly in a grant application, attached to a clear set of deliverables, and ultimately defended as a sensible investment. Something is lost if we focus too narrowly on supporting only what we can fully justify in advance. Not every research grant is funded, and difficult choices must be made in the best of funding environments. But the nature of the funding matters too, and philanthropy must help broaden the level of support provided to young scientists. This is where unrestricted funding plays an especially important role. Unrestricted funding is an investment in the person. It recognizes and supports their talent, ideas, judgment, curiosity, and long-term potential. The money provided can be used to buy new equipment, hire a new staff member, or simply pursue a new line of inquiry. It means having the space and time to evaluate an idea that might otherwise be too abstract for a regular grant application. Unrestricted funding also provides scientists with freedom in a broader sense: it can relieve anxiety over rent, allow for a much-needed family vacation, or simply reduce financial pressure and give great thinkers more time to think about their science. This is the principle upon which the Blavatnik Awards for Young Scientists was founded. Awardees receive grants ranging from $15,000 to $250,000, the largest such prizes awarded to early-career scientists. Crucially, there are no conditions attached; it is up to the awardees themselves to decide how and where the money can make the greatest difference for their science. Philanthropy alone can never be a substitute for institutional or government funding, but it can play a vital role in driving discovery and human progress. It helps to create the conditions for greater risk-taking, unexpected advances, and the encouragement and retention of exceptional scientific talent. And we have seen what can happen when that freedom is provided. Take the recipients of the Blavatnik Award. These early-career scientists have created over 50 companies, with a combined value exceeding $40 billion. Among these success stories are Amprius, which develops high-energy-density lithium-ion batteries; Editas Medicine, a gene-editing company; and Revolution Medicines, which develops new treatments for cancer. Commercial return, however, is not the only measure of success. So is a breakthrough that fundamentally changes how we understand the world or a finding that opens an entirely new field of discovery. Unrestricted funding is not simply the awarding of money. It is the gift of freedom to explore, experiment, and persevere. It provides the freedom to ask questions without knowing where the answers might lead, which is the very essence of science. [TIME Ideas](https://www.time.com/ideas) hosts the world's leading voices, providing commentary on events in news, society, and culture. We welcome outside contributions. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of TIME editors. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/10/10/why-we-must-invest-in-scientists-not-just-science/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/10/10/why-we-must-invest-in-scientists-not-just-science/"},"headline":"Why We Must Invest in Scientists, Not Just Science","datePublished":"2026-10-09T09:00:04.596Z","dateModified":"2026-10-09T09:00:05.499Z","description":"“It is through patient, painstaking work, driven by curiosity and pursued through personal dedication and sacrifice, that scientific advancement occurs,” writes Nicholas B. Dirks.","url":"https://time.com/article/2026/10/10/why-we-must-invest-in-scientists-not-just-science/","keywords":["Science"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9d5baa214a2906f4/6ac859fde835f2109d781d41/Fund-Scientists.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Nicholas B. Dirks","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/nicholas-dirks/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9d5baa214a2906f4/6ac859fde835f2109d781d41/Fund-Scientists.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Fund-Scientists.jpg","caption":"","creditText":"Westend61—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/science/","name":"Science"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/10/10/why-we-must-invest-in-scientists-not-just-science/","name":"Why We Must Invest in Scientists, Not Just Science"}}]}] ```