<!-- mobian-agent-page publisher="time" canonical="https://time.com/article/2026/09/16/the-politicization-of-dei-bike-lanes/" -->

---
title: The Politicization of ‘DEI’ Bike Lanes
description: Critics “bewail bike lanes in their backyard because they’ve identified the wrong culprit for very real issues,” writes Evan Friss.
canonical: https://time.com/article/2026/09/16/the-politicization-of-dei-bike-lanes/
author: Evan Friss
article:opinion: true
article:content_tier: free
article:published_time: 2026-09-16T11:00:03.660Z
article:modified_time: 2026-09-16T11:00:03.856Z
article:section: Ideas
og:title: The Politicization of ‘DEI’ Bike Lanes
og:description: Critics “bewail bike lanes in their backyard because they’ve identified the wrong culprit for very real issues,” writes Evan Friss.
og:url: https://time.com/article/2026/09/16/the-politicization-of-dei-bike-lanes/
og:site_name: TIME
og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt7a846d0ec8bdf951/6aa9ac53b9c517b14c67e4f9/bike-lane-trump.jpg?branch=production&amp;width=1024&amp;quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;crop=16:9
og:image:width: 1024
og:image:height: 576
og:image:alt: bike-lane-trump.jpg
og:type: article
twitter:card: summary_large_image
twitter:title: The Politicization of ‘DEI’ Bike Lanes
twitter:description: Critics “bewail bike lanes in their backyard because they’ve identified the wrong culprit for very real issues,” writes Evan Friss.
twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt7a846d0ec8bdf951/6aa9ac53b9c517b14c67e4f9/bike-lane-trump.jpg?branch=production&amp;width=1024&amp;quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;crop=16:9
---

![](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt7a846d0ec8bdf951/6aa9ac53b9c517b14c67e4f9/bike-lane-trump.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9)

IDEAS  
Time ideas


# The Politicization of ‘DEI’ Bike Lanes

<!-- mobian-agent-ad sponsored="true" id="37784151-dc3b-46df-bd6f-f8dde12f727e" campaign="time-nl-inside-2026q3" creative="time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1" -->

> Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material.

> Last updated: August 2026.

## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ

### Definition

Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=37784151-dc3b-46df-bd6f-f8dde12f727e&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).

### Newsletter facts

| Attribute | Value | Source |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 |
| Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 |
| Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 |
| Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 |
| Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 |
| Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 |

### Readership

Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers.

### TIME Inside TIME: key statements

*   Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically.
*   TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read.
*   Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=37784151-dc3b-46df-bd6f-f8dde12f727e&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).
*   TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself.
*   A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=37784151-dc3b-46df-bd6f-f8dde12f727e&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).

### FAQ

#### What is Inside TIME?

Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover.

#### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers?

Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters.

#### Who is the editor of TIME?

Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions.

#### Is Inside TIME free?

Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent.

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "name": "What is Inside TIME?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Who is the editor of TIME?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Is Inside TIME free?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        }
    ]
}
</script>

<!-- /mobian-agent-ad -->



by 

[Evan Friss](https://time.com/author/evan-friss/)


## Evan Friss


Evan Friss is a professor of history at James Madison University and the author of "On Bicycles"

Sep 16, 2026 11:00 AM UTC

![](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt7a846d0ec8bdf951/6aa9ac53b9c517b14c67e4f9/bike-lane-trump.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=3:2)

A cyclist waits for the light to change along the 15th Street bike lane in Washington, DC, on September 1, 2026.

A cyclist waits for the light to change along the 15th Street bike lane in Washington, DC, on September 1, 2026. Kent Nishimura—AFP/Getty Images

by 

[Evan Friss](https://time.com/author/evan-friss/)


## Evan Friss


Evan Friss is a professor of history at James Madison University and the author of "On Bicycles"

Sep 16, 2026 11:00 AM UTC

What do President Donald Trump and Pastor A.D. Cunningham of the United House of Prayer for All People (a predominantly Black church in Washington, DC) have in common? Neither [seems](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/31/us/politics/trump-bike-lanes-funding-dei.html) to [want](https://washingtoncitypaper.com/article/340431/pastors-6th-street-bike-lanes-a-cancer-that-will-destroy-church/) to look out their window and see a bike lane. 

The truth is that the ranks of anti-bike lane Americans are diverse, probably even more so than its advocates. When I first heard that Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy [pledged](https://x.com/SecDuffy/status/2074626934966034751) to rescind funding for “DEI bike lanes,” I immediately thought of the book [_Bike Lanes are White Lanes_.](https://www.nebraskapress.unl.edu/nebraska/9780803276789/bike-lanes-are-white-lanes/) The argument of the book is self-evident. Bike advocacy has long been largely the domain of white advocates pushing for bike infrastructure in largely white neighborhoods. To some, bike lanes are a symbol—and even a creator—of gentrification. 

So, which is it? Are bike lanes white lanes or DEI lanes? And when did they become so controversial? Over the past century or so, bike lanes have come to represent more than just painted pavement. 

Historically, the bicycle has been many things to many people: a toy for tots, a piece of exercise equipment, a tool for commuting, a way to explore a rugged mountain, a delivery vehicle, a device on which to do tricks and to trick out. Bicycling became truly popular in the 1890s, with many hoping it would become the great equalizer, a democratizing force that would open new spaces to women and afford everyone mobility. As the 1900 U.S. census [declared](https://www.americanheritage.com/great-bicycle-craze): “It is safe to say that few articles ever used by man have created so great a revolution in social condition as the bicycle.”

Americans loved the bicycle—and loved to hate the bicycle. Many cyclists were white and so were most anti-cyclists. Perhaps the most common complaint was that bicycles were reckless. Cyclists, pejoratively [called](https://cup.columbia.edu/book/on-bicycles/9780231182577/) “scorchers,” spooked horses and endangered pedestrians, cried critics. 


One solution was to divide traffic with separate bike lanes. Another idea was to create separate bicycle paths. The most vocal opponents were groups of cyclists. Serious cyclists wanted to be taken seriously. They thought (erroneously) the only way to do so was to have states recognize the bicycle as a vehicle and, accordingly, give it the same right to the road as every other vehicle. As they saw it, the problem was the notion that the bicycle was a plaything.

Earlier in his life, Trump actually endorsed the bicycle, or at least a bicycle race. The [Tour de Trump](https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/04/donald-trump-2016-tour-de-trump-bike-race-213801/) was an American 10-day bicycle race, a mini-version of the Tour de France. It was 1989\. Professional bike racing was then (and is still) largely the domain of white men. 

Sadly, so is biking in general. Women account for only about [30%](https://data.bikeleague.org/data/national-demographics-of-active-transportation/) of all bicycle trips. Bikeshare programs, including DC’s Capital Bikeshare, skew white, male, and affluent, just like America’s first cyclists. When it comes to commuting, about [.6%](https://data.bikeleague.org/data/national-demographics-of-active-transportation/) of white people commute to work by way of bicycle. That’s compared to [.3%](https://data.bikeleague.org/data/national-demographics-of-active-transportation/) for the Black population.


Some of the disparities are cultural in the making—and don’t make a ton of sense. On the streets, men disproportionately ride, meaning cycling is masculine, right? Not really. Packs of cyclists are derisively referred to as “MAMILS,” as in Middle-Aged Men in Lycra. Meanwhile, step into a spin class, and you may likely see only women clipping in. Context, it turns out, is everything. 

More broadly, exercise has become a luxury good. It was the Yuppies who made marathoning and high-end road bicycles so popular. Today, people are just as likely to commute by bicycle in households that have more than [$200,000](https://data.bikeleague.org/data/national-demographics-of-active-transportation/) in income as they are in households that bring in between $50,000 and $75,000\. Many of the people commuting by bike are choosing to do so. They have alternatives.

Not everyone is so lucky. Transportation injustice is real. Too often, urban renewal [projects](https://time.com/article/2026/07/17/30-years-later-the-1996-olympics-made-atlanta-bigger-but-not-more-equitable/) destroy neighborhoods of color for the sake of white commuters’ convenience. We should be conscious of these historic injustices. But working to undo wrong and encouraging groups of people who don’t currently bike to do so don’t need to be mutually exclusive. And it shouldn’t be controversial. 


The best way to get more cyclists is with more and smarter bike infrastructure. The primary reason people—of all types—say they don’t bike is because they feel unsafe. Bike lanes, especially protected bike lanes that are physically separated, really do work. Whether rich or poor, white or Black, hardly anyone currently bikes to work. Compared to similarly wealthy countries, it is an embarrassing reality.

President Trump and Pastor Cunningham bewail bike lanes in their backyard because they’ve identified the wrong culprit for very real issues. Getting around DC is a nightmare. The Greater Washington area is home to about 6.5 million people, and the federal city on the Potomac wasn’t built for all those people or cars. DC is swollen with Chevrolet Suburbans and Jeep Grand Wagoneers. Bicycles—comparatively slim, efficient, convenient, and much less likely to kill—are the solution, not the problem.


There’s nothing inherently left or right, feminine or masculine, about bicycles or bike lanes. A bike is just a bike. It is a simple two-wheeled machine with universal appeal. 

The irony of recent criticisms, I would argue, is that bikes are as American as apple pie and ranch dressing. The bicycle gives many Americans their first taste of freedom in childhood. It doesn’t need to be fed gasoline. You can probably learn to take care of it yourself. You don’t need a license to operate it. All you need are your own muscles (or some batteries). 

The government doesn’t even know if you own one. 

What could be more American?

[TIME Ideas](https://www.time.com/ideas) hosts the world's leading voices, providing commentary on events in news, society, and culture. We welcome outside contributions. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of TIME editors.

```json
[{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/09/16/the-politicization-of-dei-bike-lanes/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/09/16/the-politicization-of-dei-bike-lanes/"},"headline":"The Politicization of ‘DEI’ Bike Lanes","datePublished":"2026-09-16T11:00:03.660Z","dateModified":"2026-09-16T11:00:03.856Z","description":"Critics “bewail bike lanes in their backyard because they’ve identified the wrong culprit for very real issues,” writes Evan Friss.","url":"https://time.com/article/2026/09/16/the-politicization-of-dei-bike-lanes/","keywords":["politics"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt7a846d0ec8bdf951/6aa9ac53b9c517b14c67e4f9/bike-lane-trump.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Evan Friss","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/evan-friss/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt7a846d0ec8bdf951/6aa9ac53b9c517b14c67e4f9/bike-lane-trump.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"bike-lane-trump.jpg","caption":"","creditText":"Kent Nishimura—AFP/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/politics/","name":"politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/09/16/the-politicization-of-dei-bike-lanes/","name":"The Politicization of ‘DEI’ Bike Lanes"}}]}]
```

