--- title: The Planet Mercury Has Been Shrinking—More Than Scientists Expected description: A new study estimates how much our solar system's smallest planet has shrunk, and how that might change our understanding of other planets and moons. canonical: https://time.com/article/2026/09/10/mercury-shrinking-study/ author: Jeffrey Kluger article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2026-09-10T18:53:04.225Z article:modified_time: 2026-09-10T18:53:04.418Z article:section: Science og:title: The Planet Mercury Has Been Shrinking—More Than Scientists Expected og:description: The solar system's smallest planet has gotten smaller still, a new study reveals. og:url: https://time.com/article/2026/09/10/mercury-shrinking-study/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta567d18fbf6a2f0e/6aa2d355b3e3cb1d19d58428/PIA16666~orig.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1813 og:image:height: 1020 og:image:alt: PIA16666~orig.jpg og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: The Planet Mercury Has Been Shrinking—More Than Scientists Expected twitter:description: The solar system's smallest planet has gotten smaller still, a new study reveals. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta567d18fbf6a2f0e/6aa2d355b3e3cb1d19d58428/PIA16666~orig.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # The Planet Mercury Has Been Shrinking—More Than Scientists Expected > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=04a28f48-05c4-4790-bd92-f58e2b0b68b8&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=04a28f48-05c4-4790-bd92-f58e2b0b68b8&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=04a28f48-05c4-4790-bd92-f58e2b0b68b8&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement.  by [Jeffrey Kluger](https://time.com/author/jeffrey-kluger/)  ## Jeffrey Kluger Editor at Large Sep 10, 2026 6:53 PM UTC  Mercury's tortured surface obscures some signs of its past. Mercury's tortured surface obscures some signs of its past. Jpl/NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Carnegie Institution of Washington  by [Jeffrey Kluger](https://time.com/author/jeffrey-kluger/)  ## Jeffrey Kluger Editor at Large Sep 10, 2026 6:53 PM UTC Mercury is nobody’s idea of a big cosmic deal. The solar system’s smallest planet, it measures just [3,023 miles across](https://www.astronomy.com/science/mercury/)—or barely 3.6% of the [88,846 mi](https://science.nasa.gov/solar-system/planets/planet-sizes-and-locations-in-our-solar-system/). diameter of [Jupiter](https://time.com/4393292/jupiter-juno-moons-video/), the solar system’s largest. Saturn’s moon Titan and Jupiter’s [Ganymede](https://time.com/7017525/mega-asteroid-knocked-jupiter-moon-ganymede-sideways/) both also have greater diameters than [Mercury](https://time.com/2958731/mercury-peculiar-solar-system/). And according to a [new study](https://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2026GL12406) in _Geophysical Research Letters_, Mercury has actually put in the work to get as small as it is, spending part of the past 4.5 billion years shrinking—significantly more than planetologists once thought. That matters. Figuring out the history of Mercury provides clues to how all rocky worlds like the [moon](https://time.com/7346146/artemis-ii-launch-nasa-astronauts-moon-mission/) and [Mars](https://time.com/article/2026/04/21/organic-compounds-life-on-mars-research/) formed. And what happens in our solar system surely happens in ones much farther afield in space. ## How did scientists measure Mercury’s shrinking? The findings come courtesy of data gathered by the [Mercury MESSENGER spacecraft](https://science.nasa.gov/mission/messenger/)—a ship whose name was derived from the decidedly clumsy acronym “MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging.” MESSENGER launched in August 2004; reached Mercury in March 2011; and completed [4,105 orbits](https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-completes-messenger-mission-with-expected-impact-on-mercurys-surface/) of the planet before running out of fuel and crashing into the surface on April 30, 2015\. In those four-plus years on the job, MESSENGER did a lot of work, studying Mercury with [seven different scientific instruments](https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-completes-messenger-mission-with-expected-impact-on-mercurys-surface/)—including its Mercury Laser Altimeter, a ranging tool that could measure surface features [to within one meter](http://laserfocusworld.com/detectors-imaging/article/16549824/laser-altimeter-set-to-study-mercury); and a [dual imaging system](https://science.nasa.gov/mission/messenger/) that used two cameras to map the surface in wide- and narrow-angle and black and white and color.  Scientists have known for a long time that Mercury has gotten steadily smaller since its birth. The planet was formed when dust, gas, rocks, and asteroids left over from the formation of the sun collided and collected, coalescing into a discrete body and generating enormous amounts of heat in the process. Over the eons much of that heat dissipated, causing Mercury to contract by what astronomers estimated to be 2.5 miles to 10 miles in diameter. To confirm that conclusion, MESSENGER scientists used the spacecraft’s laser altimeter and dual-imager to scan the planet looking for so-called shortening structures, which are distortions in the surface made up of wrinkles, ridges, and what are known as lobate scarps—cliff-like structures that form when the crust pushes rock upward along a fault. Shortening structures form when a planet contracts; the greater the number of those surface features, the greater the planetary shrinkage has been. MESSENGER did its best to map shortening structures across the entirety of the planet, but two things made that job a challenge. For starters, the more powerful of its two imaging systems, the laser altimeter, [could not operate](https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20120009069) effectively if the spacecraft was more than 930 miles away from the planet—a proximity it reached only when it was over Mercury’s north polar region during its sweeping elliptical orbits; at other points it was [as much as 9,500 miles distant](https://spacedaily.com/messenger-modifies-orbit-to-prepare-for-extended-mission-999/). The dual-imaging system could survey the surface during those more remote approaches, but it did not produce the detailed three-dimensional pictures the laser altimeter did. Then too, there is the condition of Mercury’s surface itself. The shortening structures formed early in the planet’s history, and in the eons since, Mercury has been steadily pounded by incoming asteroids, gouging out craters and scattering debris, obscuring the telltale scars of planetary contraction. It’s possible to read through that rubble—tracing shortening structures until they are covered up by craters or rocks and estimating what their course and reach was—but that takes planet-wide three-dimensional maps, something that MESSENGER did not provide. There was, however, a way to create them. With the cooperation of NASA, the custodian of the MESSENGER images, a team led by Gaku Nishiyama, a planetary scientist at the [German Aerospace Center](https://www.dlr.de/en) Institute of Space Research and the lead author of the new paper, harvested two-dimensional pictures taken by the spacecraft’s dual-imaging system and combined them in such a way that every patch of surveyed land was captured twice—from slightly different angles each time. “We used a digital terrain model generated through so-called stereophotogrammetric technique,” says Nishiyama. “Combining two images taken at different viewing angles \[is similar to the way\] human beings recognize stuff with both eyes. So two-dimensional images are combined to derive three-dimensional topography.” With the help of that detailed terrain map, Nishiyama and his colleagues were able to study the entirety of Mercury with a resolution never before achieved. That helped the team infer the location and reach of shortening structures that were otherwise covered up over time, and that, in turn, led them to conclude that previous calculations of Mercury’s historical shrinkage were underestimates. “We find a lack of shortening structures in rough regions,” the researchers wrote, “suggesting that roughness-related processes obscure pre-existing structures. This biases previous contraction estimates downward… implying that Mercury’s contraction is up to 30% larger than previously thought.” ## What can Mercury’s shrinking teach us about the planet and our solar system? That 30% factors out to about 4.5 miles more contraction than earlier calculations—small even on the scale of a world as modest as Mercury, but significant all the same. Increased shrinkage means planetologists have to rethink what they previously believed about the chemical composition and temperature of Mercury’s core, with lower sulfur or silicon content than previously believed, leading to faster cooling and more contraction. It could also suggest that Mercury’s core started out hotter than suspected, which resulted in a more dramatic volume change when it finally did cool down. “More shrinking means Mercury could have a larger metal core, less light elements like silicon mixed into the metal core, or a higher starting temperature,” said Nishiyama in a statement that accompanied the release of the study. What Nishiyama and his colleagues learned about Mercury’s cooling and shrinking could have implications for the study of other rocky worlds like the moon and Mars. The moon has more craters and other rough features than Mercury, making it more important to try to interpret the shortening structures that did survive in order to estimate potential lunar shrinkage—learning if what happened on Mercury indeed happened on the moon and perhaps Mars. If so, says Nishiyama, all three worlds are likely to be contracting still, as heat continues to escape from their interiors into space. Meantime, Mercury will get a closer look soon. In 2018, the European and Japanese space agencies launched the [BepiColombo spacecraft](https://www.esa.int/Science%5FExploration/Space%5FScience/BepiColombo) on an eight-year journey to Mercury. The ship will arrive in December and begin science operations in April 2027\. BepiColombo has a significantly more powerful laser altimeter than MESSENGER’s, able to resolve surface changes as small as 20 centimeters (8 in.). The spacecraft will also be in a less eccentric orbit than MESSENGER, putting more of Mercury’s surface within its crosshairs. “New data from BepiColombo will open a door for understanding how Mercury has been shaped up to now,” says Nishiyama. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/09/10/mercury-shrinking-study/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/09/10/mercury-shrinking-study/"},"headline":"The Planet Mercury Has Been Shrinking—More Than Scientists Expected","datePublished":"2026-09-10T18:53:04.225Z","dateModified":"2026-09-10T18:53:04.418Z","description":"The solar system's smallest planet has gotten smaller still.","url":"https://time.com/article/2026/09/10/mercury-shrinking-study/","keywords":["Space"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta567d18fbf6a2f0e/6aa2d355b3e3cb1d19d58428/PIA16666~orig.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Jeffrey Kluger","jobTitle":"Editor at Large","url":"https://time.com/author/jeffrey-kluger/"}],"articleSection":"Science","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta567d18fbf6a2f0e/6aa2d355b3e3cb1d19d58428/PIA16666~orig.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"PIA16666~orig.jpg","caption":"","creditText":"Jpl/NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Carnegie Institution of Washington","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/science/","name":"Science"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/space/","name":"Space"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/09/10/mercury-shrinking-study/","name":"The Planet Mercury Has Been Shrinking—More Than Scientists Expected"}}]}] ```