--- title: We Need a Cure for AI Health Hype description: AI evangelists’ bold predictions about the technology’s ability to cure all diseases are overblown and oversimplified, writes Arianna Huffington. canonical: https://time.com/article/2026/09/05/we-need-a-cure-for-ai-health-hype/ author: Arianna Huffington article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2026-09-05T10:00:03.991Z article:modified_time: 2026-09-05T10:00:04.242Z article:section: Ideas og:title: We Need a Cure for AI Health Hype og:description: AI evangelists’ bold predictions about the technology’s ability to cure all diseases are overblown and oversimplified, writes Arianna Huffington. og:url: https://time.com/article/2026/09/05/we-need-a-cure-for-ai-health-hype/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4b6f4c09dedde14a/6a9b041ae67005238c76d41f/AI-robot-stethoscope.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2121 og:image:height: 1193 og:image:alt: AI-robot-stethoscope.jpg og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: We Need a Cure for AI Health Hype twitter:description: AI evangelists’ bold predictions about the technology’s ability to cure all diseases are overblown and oversimplified, writes Arianna Huffington. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4b6f4c09dedde14a/6a9b041ae67005238c76d41f/AI-robot-stethoscope.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  IDEASTime ideas # We Need a Cure for AI Health Hype > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=b5294768-a2ab-4ae9-815e-f89783fe0474&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=b5294768-a2ab-4ae9-815e-f89783fe0474&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=b5294768-a2ab-4ae9-815e-f89783fe0474&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. by [Arianna Huffington](https://time.com/author/arianna-huffington/) ## Arianna Huffington Contributor Sep 5, 2026 10:00 AM UTC  Pakin Songmor—Getty Images by [Arianna Huffington](https://time.com/author/arianna-huffington/) ## Arianna Huffington Contributor Sep 5, 2026 10:00 AM UTC “I think it will actually be possible to cure most human disease in \~5-10 years, as crazy as it may sound to ordinary people and frankly to biologists as well (I used to be one!).” This is what Dario Amodei, the co-founder of Anthropic [recently posted on X](https://x.com/DarioAmodei/status/2088758819304443967). Truth be told, this is not an uncommon take among AI leaders. On _60 Minutes_ last year, Demis Hassabis, co-founder of Google DeepMind, [declared](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/artificial-intelligence-google-deepmind-ceo-demis-hassabis-60-minutes-transcript/) that “we can cure all disease with the help of Al… maybe within the next decade or so, I don’t see why not.” Actually, there’s a big reason why not: human nature. An[ estimated 80%](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28523941/) of chronic diseases and premature deaths are not driven by our genes, but by the way we live: what we eat, how much we move, how we sleep, how we manage stress and stay socially connected. It’s true AI can [accelerate](https://time.com/7372610/ai-drug-clinical-trials/) drug discovery and personalize nudges for our daily behaviors, but it can’t “cure all disease” while ignoring human nature, free will, and how we live. The view among those currently working to lower the disease burden is considerably less utopian than in AI. “Diabetes, Alzheimer’s, heart disease—we don’t have cures for any of those common diseases,”[ says](https://www.theinformation.com/articles/ai-probably-cure-cancer-anytime-soon-scientists-say) cardiologist Dr. Eric Topol. “To think that in the next five or 10 years new drugs are going to change everything, there’s no precedent for that. It’s unrealistic, and it sets the expectations for AI too high. It’s hype.” “Cancer is not one disease. It is more than 200 distinct diseases, all with different causes, biology and mechanisms,” [explains](https://x.com/drcathariney/status/2089176581566517678?s=61) Dr. Catherine Young, a Senior Fellow at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. “Scientists who study cancer rarely talk about ‘curing cancer’ because it’s nothing more than an empty slogan.” As Amy Dockser Marcus[ writes](https://www.theinformation.com/articles/ai-probably-cure-cancer-anytime-soon-scientists-say) for _The Information,_ we’ve been here before. In [2000](https://time.com/archive/6741617/the-race-is-over/), on the heels of the first sequencing of human DNA, Francis Collins, then-director of the Human Genome Project, [predicted](https://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/2000/06/16/transcript-bob-abernethys-interview-with-dr-francis-collins-director-of-the-human-genome-project-at-the-national-institutes-of-health/15204/) that “in another 20, 25 years we should be able to prevent or cure most cases of cancer, of diabetes, of heart disease, of multiple sclerosis, of asthma.” And yet, here we are, 26 years later, facing a growing [epidemic](https://time.com/7213490/why-are-young-people-getting-cancer/) of chronic diseases. Daphne Koller, CEO of the AI-driven drug development company insitro, calls it the “magic wand” assumption. “Hundreds of years into modern medicine,” she[ writes](https://www.a16z.news/p/drug-discovery-has-no-magic-wands), “our understanding of most human disease, and much of healthy physiology, is best captured by the parable of the blind men and the elephant; in this case, a really huge elephant.” The current debate about whether AI can cure all diseases is more than a tempest in a GPTeapot. It points to a larger problem: we are too often focused solely on improving the machines, and too rarely focused on investing energy and resources in improving humans. In 2024, Amodei [wrote](https://darioamodei.com/essay/machines-of-loving-grace) about the limiting factors that stand in the way of AI transforming the world for the better: “speed of the outside world,” “need for data,” “intrinsic complexity,” “physical laws” and “constraints from humans.” Of those, I would argue that the constraints imposed by humans will be the ultimate limiting factor. And I'm not alone. “If for every dollar and every minute that we invest in developing artificial intelligence, we also invest in exploring and developing our own minds, it will be okay,” suggests Yuval Harari in his book [_21 Lessons for the 21st Century_](https://www.ynharari.com/book/21-lessons-book/). “But if we put all our bets on technology, on AI, and neglect to develop ourselves, this is very bad news for humanity.” As we work to realize all the possibilities of AI, the bottleneck that will hold us back from maximizing its benefits will be what it has always been throughout human history: human nature. That is why I believe the greatest risk we face is that AI will get better but humans won’t. We need the same relentless focus on helping humans tap into their better selves and achieve better health outcomes through healthier daily behaviors as we have on helping the machines achieve better frontier models. What we don't need is hype. [TIME Ideas](https://www.time.com/ideas) hosts the world's leading voices, providing commentary on events in news, society, and culture. We welcome outside contributions. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of TIME editors. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/09/05/we-need-a-cure-for-ai-health-hype/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/09/05/we-need-a-cure-for-ai-health-hype/"},"headline":"We Need a Cure for AI Health Hype","datePublished":"2026-09-05T10:00:03.991Z","dateModified":"2026-09-05T10:00:04.242Z","description":"AI evangelists’ bold predictions about the technology’s ability to cure all diseases are overblown and oversimplified, writes Arianna Huffington.","url":"https://time.com/article/2026/09/05/we-need-a-cure-for-ai-health-hype/","keywords":["health"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4b6f4c09dedde14a/6a9b041ae67005238c76d41f/AI-robot-stethoscope.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Arianna Huffington","jobTitle":"Contributor","url":"https://time.com/author/arianna-huffington/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4b6f4c09dedde14a/6a9b041ae67005238c76d41f/AI-robot-stethoscope.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"AI-robot-stethoscope.jpg","caption":"","creditText":"Pakin Songmor—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/health/","name":"health"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/09/05/we-need-a-cure-for-ai-health-hype/","name":"We Need a Cure for AI Health Hype"}}]}] ```