--- title: Trump’s Head Start Overhaul Borrows a Playbook That Already Failed description: “Targeting Head Start is the Trump Administration’s latest shot across the bow at America’s social safety net,” argue Peter Edelman and Lelaine Bigelow. canonical: https://time.com/article/2026/09/01/trump-s-head-start-overhaul-borrows-a-playbook-that-already-failed/ author: TIME article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2026-09-01T13:59:07.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-09-01T20:39:21.622Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Trump’s Head Start Overhaul Borrows a Playbook That Already Failed og:description: “Targeting Head Start is the Trump Administration’s latest shot across the bow at America’s social safety net,” argue Peter Edelman and Lelaine Bigelow. og:url: https://time.com/article/2026/09/01/trump-s-head-start-overhaul-borrows-a-playbook-that-already-failed/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt165f7aab1f4ab30b/6a96d3e804193c4f3296966a/Trump-McMahon-Education.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: Trump-McMahon-Education.jpg og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Trump’s Head Start Overhaul Borrows a Playbook That Already Failed twitter:description: “Targeting Head Start is the Trump Administration’s latest shot across the bow at America’s social safety net,” argue Peter Edelman and Lelaine Bigelow. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt165f7aab1f4ab30b/6a96d3e804193c4f3296966a/Trump-McMahon-Education.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  IDEAS Time ideas # Trump’s Head Start Overhaul Borrows a Playbook That Already Failed > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=27a76d3f-2b10-4adf-b895-09e1f7cb4279&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=27a76d3f-2b10-4adf-b895-09e1f7cb4279&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=27a76d3f-2b10-4adf-b895-09e1f7cb4279&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. by [Peter Edelman](https://time.com/author/peter-edelman/) and [Lelaine Bigelow](https://time.com/author/lelaine-bigelow/) Peter Edelman is the founding faculty director of the Georgetown Center on Poverty and Inequality. Lelaine Bigelow is the executive director of the Georgetown Center on Poverty and Inequality. Sep 1, 2026 1:59 PM UTC  President Donald Trump, and Education Secretary Linda McMahon during an event in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, DC, US, on Monday, Aug. 24, 2026. President Donald Trump, and Education Secretary Linda McMahon during an event in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, DC, US, on Monday, Aug. 24, 2026. Will Oliver—EPA/Bloomberg/Getty Images by [Peter Edelman](https://time.com/author/peter-edelman/) and [Lelaine Bigelow](https://time.com/author/lelaine-bigelow/) Peter Edelman is the founding faculty director of the Georgetown Center on Poverty and Inequality. Lelaine Bigelow is the executive director of the Georgetown Center on Poverty and Inequality. Sep 1, 2026 1:59 PM UTC When he launched the War on Poverty in 1964, President Lyndon Johnson[ spoke](https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/special-message-the-congress-proposing-nationwide-war-the-sources-poverty) of the “millions of Americans…who have not shared in the abundance which has been granted to most of us, and on whom the gates of opportunity have been closed.” The ensuing years would see the creation of Medicaid and [Medicare](https://time.com/3965740/medicare-50th-anniversary/), the launch of [Head Start](https://time.com/6320155/child-poverty-head-start/). This era also ushered in the establishment of a permanent national food assistance program and a dramatic expansion of federal support for education and housing. These policies and programs were all rooted in the principle that the federal government has a responsibility to help families meet their basic needs and, ultimately, thrive. As people who have dedicated our careers to advancing policies that can reduce poverty in America, we are dismayed to now see the return of the [disastrous 1990s-era](https://time.com/7278035/the-dangers-of-slashing-medicaid/) “welfare reform” approach that measures success by how many people are kicked off of public assistance programs, rather than whether fewer people actually need it. Economic research consistently shows that this approach fails to meaningfully [address poverty](https://www.mdrc.org/work/publications/what-does-mdrcs-research-really-say-about-work-requirements) or [increase](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6773.14624) [employment](https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/pol.20200561). A true anti-poverty agenda would learn from those mistakes, rather than repeat them, and build on what works. Earlier this [month](https://19thnews.org/2026/08/head-start-program-overhaul-trump-proposal/), the Trump Administration[ set its sights on Head Start](https://www.pbs.org/newshour/education/trump-administration-moves-forward-with-head-start-overhaul-proposing-to-eliminate-regulations), the federal preschool program for low-income children which has served more than 40 million since its creation. Head Start has been[ proven to reduce poverty](https://www.nber.org/digest/202104/evaluating-head-start-program-disadvantaged-children) and improve health, educational attainment, and employment opportunities over participants’ lifetimes. It does this by providing young children with essential supports: early learning in small classes, qualified teachers, consistent meals, support for parents, and regular health and developmental screenings. These supports benefit every child who participates, but[ especially](https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article-abstract/142/1/e20174017/37521/Ensuring-Timely-Connection-to-Early-Intervention?redirectedFrom=fulltext&utm%5Fsource=chatgpt.com?autologincheck=redirected) children with developmental delays whose families may struggle to access these services elsewhere. The White House disregards that record of success by seeking to strip away the standards that make it work. Under the guise of giving states more “[flexibility](https://www.npr.org/2026/08/06/nx-s1-5920386/head-start-regulations-trump),” it proposes to eliminate class size standards while reducing children’s access to needed medical and dental care. This follows President Donald Trump’s previous[ attempts](https://www.k12dive.com/news/head-start-delays-federal-funding/739327/) to freeze Head Start funding in [2025](https://apnews.com/article/head-start-medicaid-federal-funding-4fe440e35df70c7ede8ce8e0409cb581) that impacted 20,000 children in 23 states, and consideration of budget proposals that would have[ eliminated](https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/education/2025/04/11/trump-proposal-eliminating-head-start/83045346007/) it entirely. It is clear to us that targeting Head Start is the Trump Administration’s latest shot across the bow at America’s social safety net. Its signature legislative achievement, last year's "[One Big Beautiful Bill,](https://time.com/7299514/bill-will-devastate-public-schools/)" cut $187 billion from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), expanded its already[ complex and burdensome work requirements](https://www.georgetownpoverty.org/issues/big-beautiful-paperwork/), and imposed similar requirements on Medicaid nationwide for the first time. As a result,[ more than 4 million Americans](https://www.npr.org/2026/08/03/nx-s1-5906797/snap-food-stamp-federal-changes-what-to-know) have lost SNAP benefits over the past year, and more than [10 million Americans](https://www.cbpp.org/research/health/by-the-numbers-harmful-republican-megabill-will-take-health-coverage-away-from) are projected to lose their health insurance over the coming decade. Making it harder for Americans to afford food or see a doctor is a recipe for exacerbating poverty, not alleviating it. If this playbook sounds familiar, it’s because we’ve seen this movie before. In 1996, Congress created Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, or TANF, a block grant that ended the guarantee of cash assistance for families who need it and handed states[ broad discretion](https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/2024-08/Using%20TANF%20Funds%20to%20Provide%20Cash%20to%20Families.pdf) over the money. One of us, Peter Edelman,[ resigned from the Clinton Administration](https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1997/03/the-worst-thing-bill-clinton-has-done/376797/) in protest. Thirty years later, we know the results. States diverted the funds, the block grant[ lost half its value](https://www.cbpp.org/research/income-security/investing-tanf-dollars-in-basic-assistance-is-vital-for-families-to-meet) to inflation, and by 2023 just[ 21 of every 100](https://www.cbpp.org/research/income-security/tanf-is-a-vital-resource-for-people-facing-hardship-but-needs-to-reach) families with children in poverty received cash assistance, down from 68 in 1996\. TANF now reaches far fewer families and provides far less help. Instead of going down this path again, the Trump Administration and Congress should advance an anti-poverty agenda centered on two core principles: cash and care. The 2021 expansion of the Child Tax Credit showed how the right type and amount of cash assistance can transform people’s lives. It helped[ drive child poverty to a record low](https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2022/09/record-drop-in-child-poverty.html) during a pandemic[ without a significant drop in employment](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004727272400104X). When Congress let the expansion expire in 2022, child poverty immediately shot back up, and it has[ stayed elevated](https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/visualizations/2025/demo/p60-287/figure8.pdf) since.[ Research](https://www.georgetownpoverty.org/issues/expanding-refundable-tax-credits-advances-affordability-and-equity-for-women-of-color/) from our center finds that returning to the higher child tax credit, as the[ American Family Act](https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/1393) proposes, would cut child poverty nearly in half. In much of the country, child care now [costs](https://19thnews.org/2025/06/child-care-costs-rising-home-costs/) more than rent, a mortgage, or college tuition. Without support, parents often can’t take or keep [jobs](https://time.com/7306896/women-leaving-workforce/). When pandemic relief delivered the largest federal investment in child care in our history,[ our research found](https://www.georgetownpoverty.org/issues/robbed-of-choice-the-state-of-work-among-women-with-young-children/) it helped more than 400,000 mothers of young children stay in or return to work. When that funding ran out, many were pushed back out of their jobs. Leaders in Washington should be making those types of investments a priority again. We hope Americans will take advantage of the[ public comment](https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/07/2026-16134/reducing-federal-burden-for-head-start-programs) period to push back on the Administration’s Head Start proposal. But protecting what we have, while important, is still not enough. A country serious about reducing poverty would invest in policies with a demonstrated record of expanding economic opportunity. It would strengthen SNAP to[ keep pace with the real cost of food](https://www.urban.org/data-tools/does-snap-cover-cost-meal-your-county), and invest in[ guaranteed income programs](https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcatalog.results4america.org%2Fstrategies%2Fguaranteed-income&data=05%7C02%7Cmbrod%40burness.com%7C4e62d9031b9e4427fda708def9724fce%7Cd90becc13cbc4b5f813209073da19766%7C0%7C0%7C639222466587639441%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=7CYOCfulFpPOEOLiQevWiJNDRw45Clo4KtDQt0Orw4w%3D&reserved=0) that would give millions of people a stable floor to build on. It would offer paid family and medical leave, so that caring for a new baby or a seriously ill parent no longer forces families to choose between a paycheck and the people they love. America is still fighting the War on Poverty, and every American, regardless of income, has a stake in winning it. The measure of success isn't how many people we can push out of public programs. It's how many people no longer need them because they have the income, care, and opportunity to thrive. Thirty years of experience should have taught us the difference. [TIME Ideas](https://www.time.com/ideas) hosts the world's leading voices, providing commentary on events in news, society, and culture. We welcome outside contributions. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of TIME editors. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/09/01/trump-s-head-start-overhaul-borrows-a-playbook-that-already-failed/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/09/01/trump-s-head-start-overhaul-borrows-a-playbook-that-already-failed/"},"headline":"Trump’s Head Start Overhaul Borrows a Playbook That Already Failed","datePublished":"2026-09-01T13:59:07.000Z","dateModified":"2026-09-01T20:39:21.622Z","description":"“Targeting Head Start is the Trump Administration’s latest shot across the bow at America’s social safety net,” argue Peter Edelman and Lelaine Bigelow.","url":"https://time.com/article/2026/09/01/trump-s-head-start-overhaul-borrows-a-playbook-that-already-failed/","keywords":["Education"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt165f7aab1f4ab30b/6a96d3e804193c4f3296966a/Trump-McMahon-Education.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Peter Edelman","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/peter-edelman/"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Lelaine Bigelow","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/lelaine-bigelow/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt165f7aab1f4ab30b/6a96d3e804193c4f3296966a/Trump-McMahon-Education.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Trump-McMahon-Education.jpg","caption":"","creditText":"Will Oliver—EPA/Bloomberg/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/education/","name":"Education"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/09/01/trump-s-head-start-overhaul-borrows-a-playbook-that-already-failed/","name":"Trump’s Head Start Overhaul Borrows a Playbook That Already Failed"}}]}] ```