--- title: Data Center Panic: Republicans Scramble to Join Backlash description: In Texas, Michigan and Florida, Republicans are pivoting fast as polls shows voters hate the data centers fueling A.I.'s expansion canonical: https://time.com/article/2026/08/25/data-centers-republican-reset-midterms/ author: Philip Elliott article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2026-08-25T20:00:00.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-25T20:00:04.745Z article:section: Politics og:title: The GOP'S Data Center Panic og:description: In Texas, Michigan and Florida, Republicans are pivoting fast as polls shows voters hate the data centers fueling A.I.'s expansion. og:url: https://time.com/article/2026/08/25/data-centers-republican-reset-midterms/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt1edac1543dbe9dcd/6a8cf549e282477e026be58a/Republican_Data_Centers.png?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2400 og:image:height: 1350 og:image:alt: Republican Data Centers.png og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: The GOP'S Data Center Panic twitter:description: In Texas, Michigan and Florida, Republicans are pivoting fast as polls shows voters hate the data centers fueling A.I.'s expansion. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt1edac1543dbe9dcd/6a8cf549e282477e026be58a/Republican_Data_Centers.png?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # The GOP'S Data Center Panic > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=6ba4e28b-7b8c-4a3e-81f5-ab7097afb6cd&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=6ba4e28b-7b8c-4a3e-81f5-ab7097afb6cd&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=6ba4e28b-7b8c-4a3e-81f5-ab7097afb6cd&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=6ba4e28b-7b8c-4a3e-81f5-ab7097afb6cd&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1)  by [Philip Elliott](https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/)  ## Philip Elliott Senior Correspondent Aug 25, 2026 8:00 PM UTC  Photo-Illustration by TIME (Source Image: Cnv Studio via Canva)  by [Philip Elliott](https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/)  ## Philip Elliott Senior Correspondent Aug 25, 2026 8:00 PM UTC  ### The DC Brief Twice A Week Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington. Sign Up By signing up you are agreeing to our [Terms of Service](https://legal.time.com/terms-of-service/) and [Privacy Policy](https://legal.time.com/us-privacy-policy/). Not even a year ago, state leaders of all stripes were clamoring for [data centers](https://time.com/article/2026/07/03/how-to-make-ai-data-centers-more-sustainable/), the A.I.-warehouses of the future. Incentives here. Promises of infrastructure there. Sweetheart deals all around. But as voters started to view the centers as a resource suck and potentially job killers, sentiment moved quicker than a ChatGPT prompt; between March and July, public opinion [shifted](https://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/opposition-to-local-data-centers-rises-sharply-annenberg-survey-finds/) 12 points against new data centers, according to one national poll. The result has been a massive reset of assumptions about the wisdom of these campuses of computing power. The backlash is stealthily turning midterm elections across the country into referendums on [anxieties](https://time.com/article/2026/08/16/ai-race-slowdown-data-center-verification/) about an economy overrun by A.I., and specifically the role of those data centers that appear to be sending both [electricity bills](https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/big-tech-data-centers-are-driving-up-power-bills-americas-rust-belt-factories-2026-07-07/) and NIMBY-ism spiking. The shift also sets in motion a messy collision between the GOP candidates adjusting to voter sentiment and the parochial whims of their party leader. In Texas, Republican Ken Paxton rolled out a [proposal](https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2026/08/24/ken-paxton-unveils-anti-data-center-plan-gop-voter-anger-mounts-texas/) on Monday to block data centers that could use Chinese technology and hold data centers responsible if those automated A.I. bots “undermine children’s safety.” It was the latest sign this month of Republicans in the red state recalibrating on the issue, following Gov. Greg Abbott’s [announcement](https://www.texastribune.org/2026/08/03/texas-data-center-project-audit-greg-abbott/) of a pause on new data centers—after calling his state the “epicenter of AI development” in November. In Michigan, GOP Senate nominee Mike Rogers last week [called](https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/6044618-ai-data-center-backlash-michigan-ohio-pennsylvania/) for a one-year moratorium on new data centers after earlier [supporting](https://www.politico.com/news/2026/08/20/republican-mike-rogers-michigan-data-center-moratorium-01044140) their construction. His opponent, Abdul El-Sayed, has [called](https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/6044618-ai-data-center-backlash-michigan-ohio-pennsylvania/) for data centers to cover their own power costs, limit water consumption, and work with local communities to give them a “meaningful say.” El-Sayed previously said Michigan shouldn’t move [forward](https://www.npr.org/2026/08/08/g-s1-137853/data-centers-primaries-midterms) with such projects until there were “federal-level guardrails.” And in Florida, Rep. Byron Donalds, widely seen as the state’s next Governor after winning this month’s Republican primary, dumped more than $2 million on just one ad in his primary promising to “protect” the state from data centers. It was a stunning reversal from just a few weeks earlier, when Donalds [mocked](https://floridapolitics.com/archives/813403-byron-donalds-turn-clock/) opponents of the data centers as yesteryear nostalgists. “There ain’t no bans coming,” he said. You’re not imagining the whiplash. President Donald Trump has remained a cheerleader for the data centers, seeing the prospect of high-powered computer chips cementing U.S. dominance across all industries. It also hasn’t hurt that the Trump administration has [extracted](https://thehill.com/policy/technology/6000186-commerce-ai-chips-stakes/) ownership stakes in semiconductor companies in exchange for funds allocated during President Joe Biden’s term. "Communities that don't take a data center, they're making a mistake,” Trump said of the swelling number of localities banning such sites during an [interview](https://www.axios.com/2026/08/23/trump-data-centers-michael-cohen-interview) last week. It usually goes poorly for Republican candidates running counter to Trump. But on this issue, Trump's position will only make it tougher for Republicans to convince voters that they are really willing to push back on the A.I. buildout. But it’s not just Republicans facing heat on the issue. In Wisconsin, the Republican nominee for Governor, Rep. Tom Tiffany, has [labeled](https://www.wpr.org/news/tom-tiffany-attacks-david-crowley-data-centers-wisconsin-governor) his Democratic opponent “Data Center David Crowley” and has been highlighting his own opposition to Wisconsin’s tax incentives for data centers. Crowley has tried tounderscore the need for a balanced approach to the issue. As Crowley [told](https://time.com/article/2026/08/10/wisconsin-governor-primary-tuesday-francesca-hong-david-crowley/) me just this month before he won his primary: “All data centers are not all created equal.” And in Pennsylvania, Republican Stacy Garrity, the state Treasurer running for Governor, recently backed a temporary moratorium on new data centers, after saying earlier this year that Pennsylvania should [welcome](https://radio.wpsu.org/2026-01-13/a-lot-of-areas-in-rural-pa-could-house-data-centers-for-ai-growth-garrity-says) more of them. Garrity’s new approach is actually a click further than incumbent Gov. Josh Shapiro, who last year [touted](https://www.pa.gov/governor/newsroom/2025-press-releases/gov-announces-amazon-to-invest--20b-in-pa--largest-capital-inves) an Amazon data center as the largest investment in state history, but has since revoked fast-track approval for new data warehouses. Garrity is now [hitting](https://host2.adimpact.com/admo/viewer/e0f63e03-27c2-498d-a9f0-2d855ef79ffe/) Shapiro for welcoming “data centers in our backyards.” # A warning from Ohio Ohio may be where the data center backlash is playing the most visible role in a topline Senate race, as Sen. Jon Husted is trailing the Democrat, former Sen. Sherrod Brown. “More than any other thing in this race, data centers are the anchor hanging around Husted’s neck,” Senate Republicans’ campaign arm wrote in a [memo](https://ohiocapitaljournal.com/2026/08/21/leaked-memo-about-data-centers-shows-gop-worried-about-ohios-u-s-senate-race/) last week first reported by Axios. In one ad, Brown casts the data-center spree as a consequence of Husted’s advocacy when he worked as the state’s Lieutenant Governor. “Husted is a chief reason Ohio has so many of those centers,” the ad says. “He force-fed the massive energy-sucking facilities.” Brown’s strategy here dovetails neatly into his long-standing [reputation](https://time.com/article/2026/04/20/when-no-one-was-looking-ohio-became-a-swing-state-again/) as a working-class [champion](https://time.com/article/2026/06/23/ohio-may-be-the-sleeper-senate-race-of-the-midterms/), with data centers serving as physical manifestations of an A.I. revolution that is poised to cost workers’ jobs, concentrate power in the hands of the elite, and feed tech oligarchs who do not have middle-class worries at the fore. The memo continues: “Brown is using it because it works.” In the Senate, Husted has introduced legislation to encourage states to require companies to pay for their own power and ensure that the cost of new transmission infrastructure is not passed on to consumers. To be clear, the leaked memo was the campaign equivalent of putting out a Bat Signal to deep-pocketed and influential A.I. players to do something, and fast, to counteract this backlash. If the industry doesn’t get the message, it may find itself fighting this with far fewer allies heading into the 2028 presidential cycle. "If \[Husted\] loses and data centers get the blame, politicians across the country will take notices—and they will not go near the next one," the [memo](https://ohiocapitaljournal.com/2026/08/21/leaked-memo-about-data-centers-shows-gop-worried-about-ohios-u-s-senate-race/) warns. It’s not just the Senate race where data centers are dominating Ohio politics. In an unexpectedly close contest for Governor, Republican Vivek Ramaswamy has adopted a tough stance against free-riding data centers and thrown in one more populist [proposal](https://signalohio.org/ramaswamy-data-center-plan-free-electricity-november-election-2026/): “If a data center is built in your community, then … you will no longer have to pay for your home’s electricity.” The tech investor is running against Amy Acton, a former state health chief who has her own raft of demands for tech centers, including mandatory union workers. ## The Data Center Backlash, By the Numbers The speed with which the tech industry has moved to build out their computing power is quickly bumping up against the speed of communities now banning them. Last month alone saw 150 localities banning such data centers, bringing the total north of 500, according to the tracking [project](https://nypost.com/2026/08/10/business/over-500-jurisdictions-ban-data-center-construction-threatening-us-pole-position-in-ai-race/) by The Information. There are roughly 1,600 data centers in the United States these days by one count. They [consume](https://www.electricchoice.com/datacenters/) 4% of total U.S. electric consumption. The biggest hub is Virginia, with 184 sites—using enough electricity to serve 2.3 million homes, [according](https://www.electricchoice.com/datacenters/) to a Tyler, Texas,-based consulting firm that tracks the industry. Eisenbach Consulting’s tracking estimates a full 25% of Virginia’s energy now goes to data centers. The math gets fuzzy fast, though. Some [counts](https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2026/04/13/most-new-data-centers-in-the-us-are-coming-to-rural-areas/) put it at more than 3,000 data centers nationally with another 1,500 on deck. It’s that uncertainty that has helped make the murky topic even more potent for those who view the data center buildout as akin to a virus spreading across the heartland. (If one company has two warehouses on the same street, are they even separate?) Faced with the combined threats of resource depletion, higher energy costs, and potential job losses to motherboards, it’s no wonder this tech revolution has voters seeing a scary future. In politics, it’s seldom a bad instinct to find a villain and throw everything against it. But candidates doing a total 180 in the span of weeks may leave voters questioning its sincerity, especially when Trump has shown no willingness to join the spin. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/08/25/data-centers-republican-reset-midterms/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/08/25/data-centers-republican-reset-midterms/"},"headline":"The GOP'S Data Center Panic","datePublished":"2026-08-25T20:00:00.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-25T20:00:04.745Z","description":"In Texas, Michigan and Florida, Republicans are pivoting fast.","url":"https://time.com/article/2026/08/25/data-centers-republican-reset-midterms/","keywords":["The D.C. Brief","elections","AI","republicans"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt1edac1543dbe9dcd/6a8cf549e282477e026be58a/Republican_Data_Centers.png?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Philip Elliott","jobTitle":"Senior Correspondent","url":"https://time.com/author/philip-elliott/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt1edac1543dbe9dcd/6a8cf549e282477e026be58a/Republican_Data_Centers.png?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Republican Data Centers.png","caption":"","creditText":"Photo-Illustration by TIME (Source Image: Cnv Studio via Canva)","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/the-dc-brief/","name":"The D.C. Brief"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/08/25/data-centers-republican-reset-midterms/","name":"The GOP'S Data Center Panic"}}]}] ```