--- title: Why California Is Still a Climate Bellwether description: The country's largest state is still trying to address climate change—and the direction couldn't be more different from the signal out of D.C. canonical: https://time.com/article/2026/08/07/california-climate-change-policy/ author: Justin Worland article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2026-08-07T20:22:30.465Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-07T20:22:30.651Z article:section: Climate og:title: Why California Is Still a Climate Bellwether og:description: The country's largest state is still trying to address climate change—and the direction couldn't be more different from the signal out of D.C. og:url: https://time.com/article/2026/08/07/california-climate-change-policy/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt5ce97e4c0bc3ab04/6a763b4c56fcaa6e374240a1/sacramento_capitol_building_climate_change.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: sacramento capitol building climate change.jpg og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Why California Is Still a Climate Bellwether twitter:description: The country's largest state is still trying to address climate change—and the direction couldn't be more different from the signal out of D.C. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt5ce97e4c0bc3ab04/6a763b4c56fcaa6e374240a1/sacramento_capitol_building_climate_change.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Why California Is Still a Climate Bellwether > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=71e9e05a-a55d-4fc8-a7c9-5e2785b1549f&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=71e9e05a-a55d-4fc8-a7c9-5e2785b1549f&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=71e9e05a-a55d-4fc8-a7c9-5e2785b1549f&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement.  by [Justin Worland](https://time.com/author/justin-worland/)  ## Justin Worland Senior Correspondent Aug 7, 2026 8:22 PM UTC  Traffic passes by the State Capitol in Sacramento, Calif. Traffic passes by the State Capitol in Sacramento, Calif. Max Whittaker/Bloomberg—Getty Images  by [Justin Worland](https://time.com/author/justin-worland/)  ## Justin Worland Senior Correspondent Aug 7, 2026 8:22 PM UTC In some ways, Sacramento has Washington D.C. vibes. [California](https://time.com/7205644/los-angeles-california-fires-climate-change/)’s state capital runs on government, lobbying, and the sense that politics is the local industry. My hotel room when I traveled there this week for conversations about the future of energy and climate policy was decorated with political cartoons; the elevator featured political quotes. But in 2026 perhaps nothing could be more different than how the two respective governments are approaching [climate policy](https://time.com/7378565/gavin-newsom-trump-epa-climate/). Across a range of climate related issues, California has leaned in where the federal government steps back. It goes without saying that California can’t replace the federal government. But as the largest and most economically prosperous state in the country, its position is consequential. As [companies](https://time.com/7334157/gavin-newsom-cop30-climate-change/) try to parse the signal from the noise and determine the future of climate policy and demand for clean technologies, the federal government is just one indicator. Leaders now need to interpret a range of signals from governments moving in different directions. And California makes the case better than any other state that climate policy will continue in the U.S. “You have a federal government that’s really trying to send market signals away from this,” Wade Crowfoot, California Natural Resources Secretary, told me last fall. “But you also have the rest of the world moving in this direction, as well as a bunch of American states.” There was never any question from the outset of the second Trump Administration that it would take a hostile approach to states with aggressive climate policy. Almost immediately, the administration pulled back climate funding that had been directed to states. And it successfully pursued a reversal of the federal waivers that allowed California to enforce its own vehicle emissions standard. The effect has also been that some blue states have chosen to slow down local efforts. In May, New York weakened its landmark climate law amid affordability concerns. And Kathy Hochul, the state’s governor, eventually approved a new natural gas pipeline in a reported exchange for the administration allowing an offshore wind project to continue.(Hochul denied a quid-pro-quo deal)**.** And in January, Massachusetts delayed new rules designed to make heating more climate friendly. But nowhere has the pushback been stronger than in California. Before Trump even took office, California Governor Gavin Newsom promised to offer its own policies to incentivize electric vehicle adoption if Trump nixed the tax credit passed under his predecessor—a policy that the state finalized late last month. California has also continued to push through a range of other climate related regulations. And the state says it will sue the federal government over its deals to pay energy companies for stopping their offshore wind development. (In some areas, like the state’s cap-and-trade program, California has softened its approach to account for affordability concerns while leaving the core of the policy intact). This tug of war between states and the federal government has real consequences, not just for the companies but also for the broader U.S. economy. For an administration that likes to tout its support for American industry and beating China, there’s a certain irony to all of this: Rapidly changing and divergent regulatory regimes cost companies money. For an executive tasked with anticipating and responding to climate policy, the regulatory patchwork within the United States has created a tiny needle to thread. Companies will continue to build products for the California market while also satisfying the current administration. But California continues to incentivize the development of new products and, perhaps, offers a better long-term signal than vacillations at the federal level. _To get this story in your inbox, sign up to TIME's Future Proof newsletter_ [_here_](https://timefutureproof.beehiiv.com/subscribe). ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/08/07/california-climate-change-policy/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/08/07/california-climate-change-policy/"},"headline":"Why California Is Still a Climate Bellwether","datePublished":"2026-08-07T20:22:30.465Z","dateModified":"2026-08-07T20:22:30.651Z","description":"The country's largest state is still trying to address climate change—and the direction couldn't be more different from the signal out of D.C.","url":"https://time.com/article/2026/08/07/california-climate-change-policy/","keywords":["Leadership Report"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt5ce97e4c0bc3ab04/6a763b4c56fcaa6e374240a1/sacramento_capitol_building_climate_change.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Justin Worland","jobTitle":"Senior Correspondent","url":"https://time.com/author/justin-worland/"}],"articleSection":"Climate","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt5ce97e4c0bc3ab04/6a763b4c56fcaa6e374240a1/sacramento_capitol_building_climate_change.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"sacramento capitol building climate change.jpg","caption":"","creditText":"Max Whittaker/Bloomberg—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/climate/","name":"Climate"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/co2-leadership-report/","name":"Leadership Report"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/08/07/california-climate-change-policy/","name":"Why California Is Still a Climate Bellwether"}}]}] ```