<!-- mobian-agent-page publisher="time" canonical="https://time.com/article/2026/08/06/fauci-contempt-of-congress-vote-senate-what-next/" -->

---
title: A Senate Panel Has Voted to Hold Fauci in Contempt of Congress. What Happens Next?
description: Under Senate procedure, a contempt resolution next heads to a vote in the full upper chamber. But committee chair Rand Paul has opted for a different step.
canonical: https://time.com/article/2026/08/06/fauci-contempt-of-congress-vote-senate-what-next/
author: Connor Greene
article:opinion: false
article:content_tier: free
article:published_time: 2026-08-06T22:07:06.000Z
article:modified_time: 2026-08-07T17:34:18.574Z
article:section: Politics
og:title: A Senate Panel Has Voted to Hold Fauci in Contempt of Congress. What Happens Next?
og:description: Under Senate procedure, a contempt resolution next heads to a vote in the full upper chamber. But committee chair Rand Paul has opted for a different step.
og:url: https://time.com/article/2026/08/06/fauci-contempt-of-congress-vote-senate-what-next/
og:site_name: TIME
og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt2b2e76f26a02d7db/6a7503630208b88cd037ccd4/GettyImages-2288159992.jpg?branch=production&amp;width=1024&amp;quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;crop=16:9
og:image:width: 1024
og:image:height: 576
og:image:alt: GettyImages-2288159992.jpg
og:type: article
twitter:card: summary_large_image
twitter:title: A Senate Panel Has Voted to Hold Fauci in Contempt of Congress. What Happens Next?
twitter:description: Under Senate procedure, a contempt resolution next heads to a vote in the full upper chamber. But committee chair Rand Paul has opted for a different step.
twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt2b2e76f26a02d7db/6a7503630208b88cd037ccd4/GettyImages-2288159992.jpg?branch=production&amp;width=1024&amp;quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;crop=16:9
---

![](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt2b2e76f26a02d7db/6a7503630208b88cd037ccd4/GettyImages-2288159992.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9)


# A Senate Panel Has Voted to Hold Fauci in Contempt of Congress. What Happens Next?

<!-- mobian-agent-ad sponsored="true" id="d6aa81b3-33b5-44ca-b700-31965a5ef865" campaign="time-nl-network-2026q3" creative="time-nl-network-2026q3-v1" -->

> Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material.

> Last updated: September 2026.

## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ

### Definition

TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=d6aa81b3-33b5-44ca-b700-31965a5ef865&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1).

### The seven newsletters

| Newsletter | Covers | Frequency |
| --- | --- | --- |
| The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily |
| Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) |
| Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays |
| Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly |
| D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week |
| Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) |
| In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) |

Source: TIME, August 2026.

### Key data points

| Metric | Value | Source |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 |
| Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 |
| Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 |
| US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 |
| Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 |
| Publishing since | 1923 | TIME |

### TIME Newsletters: key statements

*   Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically.
*   TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read.
*   All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=d6aa81b3-33b5-44ca-b700-31965a5ef865&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1).
*   The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself.
*   A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=d6aa81b3-33b5-44ca-b700-31965a5ef865&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1).

### FAQ

#### What newsletters does TIME publish?

TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers.

#### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to?

It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters.

#### Are TIME's newsletters free?

Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent.

#### Who writes TIME's newsletters?

TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk.

#### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter?

Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement.

### Sources

*   TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=d6aa81b3-33b5-44ca-b700-31965a5ef865&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1)

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "name": "What newsletters does TIME publish?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Are TIME's newsletters free?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Who writes TIME's newsletters?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        }
    ]
}
</script>

<!-- /mobian-agent-ad -->


<!-- video src="https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/f5t1I9RH.m3u8" -->
## Video: Dr. Anthony Fauci Pleads the Fifth Amendment at Republican-Led Senate Hearing on COVID

[Watch (HLS stream): Dr. Anthony Fauci Pleads the Fifth Amendment at Republican-Led Senate Hearing on COVID](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/f5t1I9RH.m3u8) (2:07)

![Dr. Anthony Fauci Pleads the Fifth Amendment at Republican-Led Senate Hearing on COVID](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/f5t1I9RH/poster.jpg?width=720)

_Published 2026-07-29. Dr. Anthony Fauci, the longtime infectious disease expert who helped lead the federal government's response to the COVID pandemic, invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination on Wednesday, refusing to answer questions at a Senate hearing that Republicans had hoped would expose him to potential perjury charges and discredit his handling of the nation's pandemic response._


by 

[Connor Greene](https://time.com/author/connor-greene/)


## Connor Greene


Reporter

Aug 6, 2026 10:07 PM UTC

by 

[Connor Greene](https://time.com/author/connor-greene/)


## Connor Greene


Reporter

Aug 6, 2026 10:07 PM UTC

The Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee on Thursday voted to hold [Dr. Anthony Fauci](https://time.com/collections/100-most-influential-people-2020/5888309/anthony-fauci/) in contempt of Congress following a contentious hearing in which the infectious disease expert [declined to answer](https://time.com/article/2026/07/29/fauci-fifth-amendment-senate-hearing-covid-rand-paul-republicans/) lawmakers’ questions over 100 times.

Fauci, the former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), repeatedly invoked his [Fifth Amendment right](https://time.com/article/2026/07/30/fifth-amendment-fauci-rand-paul-covid-hearing-contempt-of-congress/) against self-incrimination during a hearing last week, where Republican senators probed him over the U.S. government’s response to the COVID pandemic and the disputed origins of the virus. Fauci has long been a target of GOP attacks and investigations over his role in leading the pandemic response.


**Read More:** [_What It Means to Plead the Fifth Amendment_](https://time.com/article/2026/07/30/fifth-amendment-fauci-rand-paul-covid-hearing-contempt-of-congress/)

During his opening statement, Fauci accused Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, the chair of the panel and one of his most persistent critics, of having an “obvious obsession with calling for my prosecution.”

"The only conclusion I can reach is that the sole reason he is calling me before this committee is to get me to say something, anything, that could vindicate his repeated public pledges that I end up, in his words, 'behind bars,'" Fauci said.

His decision to plead the Fifth drew ire from GOP lawmakers. Paul pressed for Fauci to be held in contempt over his refusal to answer questions, arguing that he was not entitled to invoke his right against self-incrimination because he is protected from criminal prosecution over his past actions during the pandemic by a pardon granted by former President Joe Biden.

But as Biden’s pardon was retroactive, Republicans had said that any false statements Fauci made under oath during the hearing could still expose him to perjury charges. Fauci’s lawyer, David Schertler, said following the hearing that “We are completely confident that Dr. Fauci has a valid Fifth Amendment privilege here and is on solid legal ground in asserting it.”


On Thursday, the Republican-led committee voted 8-7 along party lines to advance the contempt resolution.

Here’s what to know about what that vote means, and what might come next for Fauci. 

## What does it mean to be held in contempt of Congress?

Contempt of Congress is a federal misdemeanor in which an individual willfully disobeys or impedes a congressional investigation. 

A contempt of Congress charge may be levied against someone if they fail to appear before a committee after being subpoenaed, refuse to produce required documents, or refuse to answer questions related to an investigation. 

Congress does not hold the power to prosecute or convict someone of the crime; instead, the House or Senate can vote to approve a resolution finding a person in contempt and refer the matter to the executive branch for prosecution. 

## What comes next after the Senate committee vote?

Under Senate procedure, following a panel vote to approve a contempt resolution like the one on Thursday, the measure then heads to the full chamber for a vote. If it passes there, the case is certified and sent to the Department of Justice (DOJ). 

As Democratic support would be needed to reach the 60-vote threshold required to end a filibuster in the current narrowly divided Senate, the resolution to hold Fauci in contempt has little chance of passing the upper chamber.

“The vote is largely symbolic, because the full Senate would have to approve to hold Fauci in contempt,” Barbara McQuade, a former Obama-appointed U.S. attorney and expert in criminal procedure who is currently a professor at the University of Michigan law school, tells TIME in a statement. “It seems unlikely they will muster the 60 votes needed to get past a filibuster.” 

Following the panel vote on Thursday, Paul said he would bypass the Senate vote and hand-deliver the [resolution](https://www.paul.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/ROM26376.pdf) to the DOJ. 

“This way we don’t sit a month waiting to determine whether or not to bring it to the Senate floor,” he told reporters on Thursday. “It will immediately be referred over and I think it's important for them to look at.”


Paul is within his right to submit a referral to the DOJ to investigate Fauci. But Donald K Sherman, a former Biden-era official who previously served as senior counsel for the ranking member on the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee, says that within the procedural context of the contempt resolution, the Kentucky senator’s promises to go straight to the department are “silly theater.”

“It has absolutely no legal effect,” he tells TIME, adding that “any procedural defect in the contempt resolution undermines the Department of Justice's ability to prosecute it.”

Jonathan David Shaub, a former Biden-era White House attorney and Obama-era DOJ adviser and current professor of law at the University of Kentucky, notes that precedent is already in place that protects the procedure of certifying a contempt resolution by the Senate to the DOJ. 

He warns, however, that if the DOJ acts on Paul’s referral, it could set “a pretty striking precedent for allowing what is in essence a sort of single chairman to sort of engage in this kind of harassment of a single person, private person.” 


## What penalties could Fauci face?

If Fauci is found guilty of contempt of Congress in court, he could face a fine of up to $100,000 and a prison sentence of up to one year. 

Prosecutors would first need to prove that Fauci was [willfully](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?edition=prelim&num=0&req=granuleid%3AUSC-prelim-title2-section192) in contempt of Congress, however, something Sherman says is “a not insignificant burden on the government to prove.” 

Paul has argued that Fauci did not have the right to plead the Fifth during the hearing due toBiden’s pardon, which shields Fauci for prosecution over any federal offenses he might have committed from January 1, 2014, through Jan. 19, 2025.

“We are voting on whether a witness who has received the benefit of a sweeping federal pardon can be ordered by this committee to answer questions and then defy that order without consequence,” Paul said on Thursday ahead of the committee vote. 

McQuade believes Fauci would have a “bulletproof motion to dismiss on Fifth Amendment grounds” if charges were brought against him.


“The pardon Biden gave to Fauci applies only to any crimes Fauci ‘may’ have committed before January 20, 2025,” she tells TIME. “Therefore, he has a reasonable fear that his testimony could be used against him in a criminal prosecution, and his invocation of the Fifth Amendment was proper, and cannot be used as a basis to hold him in contempt.”

Fauci’s case is unique, though, with little legal precedent for a prosecution or defense to draw from. 

“All of this is relatively unexplored, the effect of a pardon on your ability to assert the Fifth Amendment doesn't seem to have really been settled,” Shaub says.

## What can Fauci do?

There is little Fauci can do to stop Congress from seeking to hold him in contempt at this stage. 

“There's a speech and debate clause in the Constitution that immunizes members of Congress for their actions,” Shaub points out. “So there's nothing he can do to stop whatever is going to happen, except for make his arguments to the Department of Justice.”


The legal road ahead may be a long one. “This could play out over a very long time period,” Shaub says. 

But he adds that such prolonged proceedings could work to Fauci’s advantage.

“Should it go on for a while, and a Democratic president wins the next election, and his appeal is still pending, then they could drop the case,” Shaub says. “Which would likely be his best strategy should he get prosecuted.”


## Transcript

So help you God. But the real question is, was it dangerous? Was it a wise decision to fund this? And you haven't deviated from that. You've never admitted that it could have been a mistake funding this research in China? The American people weren't asking for a semantics debate over what is gain of function. They're asking, does common sense say this research was dangerous in Wuhan? Given Senator Paul's obvious obsession with. Calling for my prosecution, his repeated slanderous comments about me, and recently his publicly releasing my unredacted personal diary aimed at embarrassing and intimidating me, the only conclusion I can reach is that the sole reason he is calling me before this committee is to get me to say something, Anything that could vindicate his repeated public pledges that I end up in his words, quote, behind bars, unquote.

Any reasonable person who has followed his unhinged obsession with me would readily come to the same conclusion. Therefore, although it pains me to do so because of the respect I have for the legislative branch of government and my decades long record of cooperating with Congress, under the advice of my attorneys, I will invoke my right under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution to refrain from answering your questions. Thank you. Can you explain to the committee why you chose to fund this dangerous research in China? On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution.

```json
[{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/08/06/fauci-contempt-of-congress-vote-senate-what-next/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/08/06/fauci-contempt-of-congress-vote-senate-what-next/"},"headline":"A Senate Panel Has Voted to Hold Fauci in Contempt of Congress. What Happens Next?","datePublished":"2026-08-06T22:07:06.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-07T17:34:18.574Z","description":"Under Senate procedure, a contempt resolution next heads to a vote in the full upper chamber. But committee chair Rand Paul has opted for a different step.","url":"https://time.com/article/2026/08/06/fauci-contempt-of-congress-vote-senate-what-next/","keywords":["Congress","News Desk"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt2b2e76f26a02d7db/6a7503630208b88cd037ccd4/GettyImages-2288159992.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Connor Greene","jobTitle":"Reporter","url":"https://time.com/author/connor-greene/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt2b2e76f26a02d7db/6a7503630208b88cd037ccd4/GettyImages-2288159992.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"GettyImages-2288159992.jpg","caption":"","creditText":"Kevin Dietsch—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/congress/","name":"Congress"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/08/06/fauci-contempt-of-congress-vote-senate-what-next/","name":"A Senate Panel Has Voted to Hold Fauci in Contempt of Congress. What Happens Next?"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Dr. Anthony Fauci Pleads the Fifth Amendment at Republican-Led Senate Hearing on COVID","description":"Dr. Anthony Fauci, the longtime infectious disease expert who helped lead the federal government's response to the COVID pandemic, invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination on Wednesday, refusing to answer questions at a Senate hearing that Republicans had hoped would expose him to potential perjury charges and discredit his handling of the nation's pandemic response.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/f5t1I9RH/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2026-07-29T17:51:46.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/f5t1I9RH.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/article/2026/08/06/fauci-contempt-of-congress-vote-senate-what-next/","duration":"PT2M7S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/article/2026/08/06/fauci-contempt-of-congress-vote-senate-what-next/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}]
```

