--- title: Blanche Wins GOP Backing After Rescinding ‘Anti-Weaponization Fund’ description: The Senate Judiciary Committee's Republican holdouts say they've secured the written assurance they sought and will now support Blanche—even as Trump explores ways to revive the fund. canonical: https://time.com/article/2026/08/03/blanche-wins-gop-backing-after-rescinding-anti-weaponization-fund-/ author: Rebecca Schneid article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2026-08-03T15:59:34.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-03T16:58:10.960Z article:section: Politics og:title: Blanche Wins GOP Backing After Rescinding ‘Anti-Weaponization Fund’ og:description: The Senate Judiciary Committee's Republican holdouts say they've secured the written assurance they sought and will now support Blanche—even as Trump explores ways to revive the fund. og:url: https://time.com/article/2026/08/03/blanche-wins-gop-backing-after-rescinding-anti-weaponization-fund-/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc8331b671135a7f8/6a70bf59f59e1dcc56ef4d0c/GettyImages-2288183383.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: GettyImages-2288183383.jpg og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Blanche Wins GOP Backing After Rescinding ‘Anti-Weaponization Fund’ twitter:description: The Senate Judiciary Committee's Republican holdouts say they've secured the written assurance they sought and will now support Blanche—even as Trump explores ways to revive the fund. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc8331b671135a7f8/6a70bf59f59e1dcc56ef4d0c/GettyImages-2288183383.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Blanche Wins GOP Backing After Rescinding ‘Anti-Weaponization Fund’ > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME D.C. Brief: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition D.C. Brief is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington. D.C. Brief goes beyond the Washington headlines to explain the politics, personalities and power dynamics shaping what happens next. Senior correspondent Philip Elliott brings sharp context to the issues driving the capital, connecting the decisions made in Washington to the institutions, industries and people they affect. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=c702b744-1fa0-4ea7-ae52-874a1b2d1c9f&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Twice a week | time.com/newsletters, September 2026 | | Written by | Philip Elliott, Senior Correspondent | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership The policy influence ecosystem. A policy-focused audience spanning government, public affairs, advocacy, law, research, political media, and the institutions that make, interpret and respond to public policy. ### TIME D.C. Brief: key statements * D.C. Brief is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * D.C. Brief is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=c702b744-1fa0-4ea7-ae52-874a1b2d1c9f&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/subscribe?i=c702b744-1fa0-4ea7-ae52-874a1b2d1c9f&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is TIME's politics newsletter? D.C. Brief is TIME's Washington newsletter, written by senior correspondent Philip Elliott. It explains the politics, personalities and power dynamics behind the headlines, twice a week. #### Where can I get analysis of Washington politics by email? D.C. Brief is TIME's free Washington politics newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. It is written by a TIME senior correspondent who covers the capital full time. #### Who writes TIME's D.C. Brief? Philip Elliott, a senior correspondent at TIME, writes D.C. Brief. #### Is D.C. Brief free? Yes. D.C. Brief is free at time.com/newsletters. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=c702b744-1fa0-4ea7-ae52-874a1b2d1c9f&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1)  by [Rebecca Schneid](https://time.com/author/rebecca-schneid/)  ## Rebecca Schneid Reporter Aug 3, 2026 3:59 PM UTC  Attorney General Nominee Todd Blanche leaves a meeting on Capitol Hill on July 29, 2026, in Washington, D.C. Attorney General Nominee Todd Blanche leaves a meeting on Capitol Hill on July 29, 2026, in Washington, D.C. Kevin Dietsch—Getty Images  by [Rebecca Schneid](https://time.com/author/rebecca-schneid/)  ## Rebecca Schneid Reporter Aug 3, 2026 3:59 PM UTC The Republican Senators who stood in the way of Todd Blanche’s confirmation as U.S. Attorney General said they will now support it, after Blanche signed an [order](https://x.com/DAGToddBlanche/status/2084114427813437897) Monday to formally rescind the Justice Department’s planned $1.8 billion “[anti-weaponization fund](https://time.com/article/2026/05/18/trump-doj-anti-weaponization-fund-irs-lawsuit-settlement/).” The fund was intended to compensate those who the Trump Administration [claimed](https://time.com/article/2026/06/03/trump-doj-anti-weaponization-fund-j6-blanche-irs-tax-audit/) were unfairly persecuted by the government, and it has been the subject of bipartisan criticism—partially because payouts could extend to [Jan. 6](https://time.com/7343370/5-years-since-jan-6-insurrection/) defendants. The Republican holdouts on the Senate Judiciary Committee, Sens. John Cornyn of Texas and Thom Tillis of North Carolina, had said that they would not stand behind the Acting Attorney General’s confirmation without a written assurance that the fund had been killed by the DOJ. Blanche fulfilled this request after what he described as a series of “good faith discussions” with the holdouts. “The Department always welcomes and appreciates productive engagement with all members of Congress,” Blanche wrote in his post on X, where he attached copies of the formal retraction alongside a statement from the Justice Department. “Although the Acting Attorney General has repeatedly advised Congress through testimony, including under oath, as well as in written responses, that the Fund is not moving forward, and the Department has repeatedly represented to district courts that the Fund is not moving forward, today’s Order officially rescinds the May 18, 2026 Order,” the statement explained. Blanche also clarified that the written order did not imply that the fund had ever been operational. “No Members were appointed; no funds were transferred; no process for receiving claims was established; no claims were paid,” the retraction order said. “This Order establishes, beyond any doubt, that there is no Fund.” In a joint statement Monday, Cornyn and Tillis said they were “pleased” by Blanche’s decision and “look forward to voting to advance his nomination out of the Senate Judiciary Committee soon.” The Judiciary Committee is scheduled to vote on whether Blanche should replace Pam Bondi as Attorney General on Tuesday. With Tillis and Cornyn back in his corner, Blanche is expected to move forward without further Republican opposition. ## Could Trump revive the fund? The “anti-weaponization fund” stemmed from the Justice Department's settlement of Trump's lawsuit against the IRS over the leak of his tax returns. It was formally established May 18. Despite its retraction nearly three months later, Blanche indicated amid his Judiciary hearing last month that there may be avenues for the settlement to proceed in the future, such as advancing through Congress. A congressional bill could establish a similar fund and appropriate money for it. With support from both the House and Senate, Trump could sign the bill into law—a route that he has already said he might pursue. However, the timing of such a move would be important, as its prospects of passing both chambers could shift following midterm elections in November. Trump said on [Truth Social](https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/117020029291674756) on Saturday that he would “push hard” to keep the fund alive in some form. “Todd Blanche was a voice of reason! It will immediately be back on the table, and I will get it done. Thank you for your attention to this matter!” he wrote. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/08/03/blanche-wins-gop-backing-after-rescinding-anti-weaponization-fund-/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/08/03/blanche-wins-gop-backing-after-rescinding-anti-weaponization-fund-/"},"headline":"Blanche Wins GOP Backing After Rescinding ‘Anti-Weaponization Fund’","datePublished":"2026-08-03T15:59:34.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-03T16:58:10.960Z","description":"The Senate Judiciary Committee's Republican holdouts say they've secured the written assurance they sought and will now support Blanche—even as Trump explores ways to revive the fund.","url":"https://time.com/article/2026/08/03/blanche-wins-gop-backing-after-rescinding-anti-weaponization-fund-/","keywords":["Trump Administration","January 6","Justice Department","Department of Justice","Senate","republicans","News Desk"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc8331b671135a7f8/6a70bf59f59e1dcc56ef4d0c/GettyImages-2288183383.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Rebecca Schneid","jobTitle":"Reporter","url":"https://time.com/author/rebecca-schneid/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc8331b671135a7f8/6a70bf59f59e1dcc56ef4d0c/GettyImages-2288183383.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"GettyImages-2288183383.jpg","caption":"","creditText":"Kevin Dietsch—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/trump-administration/","name":"Trump Administration"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/08/03/blanche-wins-gop-backing-after-rescinding-anti-weaponization-fund-/","name":"Blanche Wins GOP Backing After Rescinding ‘Anti-Weaponization Fund’"}}]}] ```