--- title: Trump’s Attacks on the Smithsonian Are an Attack on American History description: A new report criticizing the Smithsonian is “part of a broader effort that threatens to reduce American history to conservative ideology,” writes Marc Stein. canonical: https://time.com/article/2026/07/08/trump-s-attacks-on-the-smithsonian-are-an-attack-on-american-history/ author: Marc Stein article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2026-07-08T17:44:32.719Z article:modified_time: 2026-07-08T17:44:36.828Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Trump’s Attacks on the Smithsonian Are an Attack on American History og:description: A new report criticizing the Smithsonian is “part of a broader effort that threatens to reduce American history to conservative ideology,” writes Marc Stein. og:url: https://time.com/article/2026/07/08/trump-s-attacks-on-the-smithsonian-are-an-attack-on-american-history/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt148aed592c4bd98f/6a4e8c298ca1635797f434c6/Smithsonian-American-History-Museum.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1024 og:image:height: 576 og:image:alt: Smithsonian-American-History-Museum.jpg og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Trump’s Attacks on the Smithsonian Are an Attack on American History twitter:description: A new report criticizing the Smithsonian is “part of a broader effort that threatens to reduce American history to conservative ideology,” writes Marc Stein. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt148aed592c4bd98f/6a4e8c298ca1635797f434c6/Smithsonian-American-History-Museum.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  IDEAS Time ideas # Trump’s Attacks on the Smithsonian Are an Attack on American History > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=518f4809-30d3-46ce-b42a-ec0b25878406&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=518f4809-30d3-46ce-b42a-ec0b25878406&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=518f4809-30d3-46ce-b42a-ec0b25878406&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. by [Marc Stein](https://time.com/author/marc-stein/) ## Marc Stein Marc Stein is the President of the Organization of American Historians. Jul 8, 2026 5:44 PM UTC  The Smithsonian American History Museum on July 07, 2026 in Washington, DC. The Smithsonian American History Museum on July 07, 2026 in Washington, DC. Finn Gomez—Getty Images by [Marc Stein](https://time.com/author/marc-stein/) ## Marc Stein Marc Stein is the President of the Organization of American Historians. Jul 8, 2026 5:44 PM UTC On the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence, the Trump Administration attempted to declare independence from history with the release of [“Saving America’s Story.”](https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Smithsonian-Report-Saving-Americas-Story.pdf) Assigned an [Orwellian](https://time.com/7284644/trumps-erasure-of-women/) title that obscures the effort to [rewrite](https://time.com/7327987/trump-defund-arts-rewrite-history/) America’s story, the 162-page Domestic Policy Council report, published on the White House’s website on July 4, attacks the archivists, curators, educators, historians, and museum professionals who work at the Smithsonian National Museum of American History. That the administration has chosen to do this at precisely the moment when it is [gutting](https://apnews.com/article/trump-national-archives-firings-layoffs-historical-recordkeeping-559027fdd2f634263bea7774a78d66fe) the National Archives and [censoring](https://time.com/7357382/george-washington-slavery-exhibit-philadelphia/) historical exhibits at national parks demonstrates that the new report is just one part of a broader effort that threatens to reduce [American history](https://time.com/7320335/honest-american-history-shouldnt-be-divisive/) to conservative ideology. The report follows President Donald Trump’s March 27 “[Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History](https://time.com/7309220/smithsonian-review-white-house-trump/)” executive order. And like so many Trump administration reports and statements, it can be seen as a classic example of projection, whereby the administration accuses others of doing exactly what it is doing. The report states, for example, that “museum leadership has explicitly adopted an ideological framework that no longer treats the American story as a shared national inheritance to be taught or celebrated, but as a political instrument to divide, dispirit, and discourage our citizens.” That is not an accurate assessment of the Smithsonian, but it is a pretty good description of the new report. What's more, the report includes multiple false claims about American history and the Smithsonian. To take one example, it is simply not true that the museum has “not created any exhibit dedicated to presenting a general narrative of American history” or telling the story of the Founding Fathers, the Declaration of Independence, the Revolutionary War, or the U.S. Constitution. Nor is it true that the museum fails “to provide America’s young people access to what is genuinely inspiring and unifying in our history, as well as to the lessons imparted by the American experience of overcoming great national challenges.” It is entirely false to assert that the museum disregards “the progress America has made and the ideals that continue to inspire millions.” The Domestic Policy Council also mischaracterizes and misrepresents the words of the museum’s director, Anthea Hartig, who has consistently worked to educate and inform visitors through innovative exhibits and inspirational programs. Indeed, the report itself quotes Hartig’s 2026 welcome to the museum’s special semiquincentennial exhibit. “Thank you for joining us this year as we celebrate the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. Throughout the museum you’ll experience the history and legacies of the revolutionary generation that took a great leap into democracy together in 1776,” reads Hartig’s statement. “And you’ll see how Americans have worked since that time to realize the ideals written into this groundbreaking document. We are proud to celebrate the birth of the United States and will continue to share the stories of all Americans as we look to the next 250 years.” This quotation rejects the notion that Hartig, or the Smithsonian more broadly, fails to properly celebrate American history. Trump’s Domestic Policy Council also directly contradicts itself at times. “NMAH’s only special programming to commemorate America’s 250th anniversary, _In Pursuit of Life, Liberty & Happiness_, fails to celebrate America’s Founders and the American Founding,” the report claims. But the following sentence admits that the exhibition “highlights 250 objects from the museum’s collections, including remarkable artifacts like the desk Thomas Jefferson used to draft the Declaration of Independence, George Washington’s uniform, a ship of the early U.S. Navy, and, of course, the Star-Spangled Banner, the 1813 flag that inspired the National Anthem.” Instead of accurately describing the work of thousands of museum professionals, the report demands that the Smithsonian favor one form of U.S. patriotism over all others. In the process, it minimizes discussions of the political struggles and social movements that have attempted to move the United States toward “a more perfect union.” In passing, the report acknowledges that the goal of the museum should be to “document and share the achievements and failures of the Nation,” “tell the truth, including of the Nation’s mistakes and injustices,” and “tell the _whole_ story of a nation, including the good and the bad.” In practice, however, it condemns work that mentions national shortcomings as anti-American. To take just one example, the report describes Native American land acknowledgments, no matter their wording, as signs of “an anti-white agenda” and “an anti-American ideology that claims our country rests on stolen land.” More generally, the report constitutes an attack on American historians, museum professionals, and intellectual expertise, asserting at one point that “much of the museum profession” engages in “discriminatory and likely illegal behaviors and practices” and accusing “the largest funder of the humanities” (the Mellon Foundation) of advocating for “discriminatory practices.” Once again, these would do well as descriptions of the administration’s new report, but they fail to capture the democratic aspirations of most museum professionals and many humanities foundations today. The report’s authors seem to believe that there is only one correct way to do history, only one correct interpretation of history, only one version of history that merits recognition, beliefs that are fundamentally at odds with the practice of history, which encourages dialogue, discussion, and debate. Indeed, the report is deeply critical of narratives of American history that emphasize democracy and diversity, interpretations that highlight the significance of political activism and social movements, and projects that present inspirational and instructional stories about how and why the United States has evolved. Make no mistake about it: the report represents an attempt to turn back the clock to a time when U.S. history was taught as the history of white Christian men who conquered a continent, U.S. military leaders who never lost a battle, and U.S. presidents who were single-handedly responsible for national greatness. In educational contexts, we expect math and science teachers to offer up-to-date lessons that reflect today’s knowledge, not outdated information that has been discredited and superseded by leading scholars in their fields; we should expect the same in historical, humanities, and museum contexts. If the National Museum of American History adopts the approaches recommended in the new report, the majority of Americans—immigrants, women, workers, people of color, people with disabilities, and LGBTQ+ people—will not see themselves represented, and America’s rich and complex history will be reduced to shallow, superficial, and simple-minded stories. I visited the National Museum of American History several months ago, taking in several exhibits, including [“American Democracy: A Great Leap of Faith,”](https://americanhistory.si.edu/explore/exhibitions/american-democracy) [“The Price of Freedom: Americans at War,” ](https://americanhistory.si.edu/explore/exhibitions/price-of-freedom)[“The Star-Spangled Banner: The Flag That Inspired the National Anthem,”](https://americanhistory.si.edu/explore/exhibitions/star-spangled-banner) [“Gunboat Philadelphia,”](https://americanhistory.si.edu/explore/exhibitions/gunboat-philadelphia) [“The First Ladies,”](https://americanhistory.si.edu/explore/exhibitions/first-ladies) [“Entertainment Nation,”](https://americanhistory.si.edu/explore/exhibitions/entertainment-nation) [“How Can You Forget Me: Filipino American Stories,”](https://americanhistory.si.edu/explore/exhibitions/how-can-you-forget-me) and [“Corazón y Vida: Lowriding Culture.”](https://americanhistory.si.edu/explore/exhibitions/corazon-y-vida-lowriding-culture) What I saw and experienced was completely at odds with the report’s characterizations. I saw innovative combinations of old and new approaches to American history, appropriate balances of celebration and criticism, and constructive presentations of multiple views and viewpoints. If anything, I would like to see the museum do more, not less, to democratize and diversify its presentation of American history. My advice to Americans: go see the Smithsonian for yourselves. [TIME Ideas](https://www.time.com/ideas) hosts the world's leading voices, providing commentary on events in news, society, and culture. We welcome outside contributions. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of TIME editors. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/07/08/trump-s-attacks-on-the-smithsonian-are-an-attack-on-american-history/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/07/08/trump-s-attacks-on-the-smithsonian-are-an-attack-on-american-history/"},"headline":"Trump’s Attacks on the Smithsonian Are an Attack on American History","datePublished":"2026-07-08T17:44:32.719Z","dateModified":"2026-07-08T17:44:36.828Z","description":"A new report criticizing the Smithsonian is “part of a broader effort that threatens to reduce American history to conservative ideology,” writes Marc Stein.","url":"https://time.com/article/2026/07/08/trump-s-attacks-on-the-smithsonian-are-an-attack-on-american-history/","keywords":["History"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt148aed592c4bd98f/6a4e8c298ca1635797f434c6/Smithsonian-American-History-Museum.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Marc Stein","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/marc-stein/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt148aed592c4bd98f/6a4e8c298ca1635797f434c6/Smithsonian-American-History-Museum.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Smithsonian-American-History-Museum.jpg","caption":"","creditText":"Finn Gomez—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/history/","name":"History"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/article/2026/07/08/trump-s-attacks-on-the-smithsonian-are-an-attack-on-american-history/","name":"Trump’s Attacks on the Smithsonian Are an Attack on American History"}}]}] ```